• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

SWF Ubers Cup II [Dream World Ubers Tourney] - Congratulations ss118!

Status
Not open for further replies.

kirbyraeg

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
6,440
Location
in Makai
Bo1 or Bo3 are both not bad. Each have their advantages, but Bo3 seems better for tournament play in general, just because it introduces longer-term reads in playing. It's like saying "no counterpicks" in a set of melee, nobody does that lol
 

CT Chia

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
24,416
Location
Philadelphia
I mean it's not bad, but I don't think it really fits pokemon

counterpicking in pokemon is a complete mind screw
Either you have a rule where only the loser can change his/her team and it's completely broken as desigining a team to counter a specific one in pokemon is very easy and way too effective, or you let both players change their team and it becomes a mind screw with well if he changes it to counter this then i'l counter that counter's counter and if he does this then i'll be prepared with that, etc
 

Wrath`

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
4,824
Location
Binghamton, NY
Or be a real man and just use the same team both rounds all matches like me. Then again that might be why I don't make it far....oh well.
 

Circa

Smash Champion
Joined
Feb 6, 2009
Messages
2,874
Location
Three Rivers, MI
NNID
timssu
3DS FC
1891-2120-4792
Rule 11 I get, but rule 5? You don't like best 2 out of 3?
My reasoning is almost the same as Chibo's, except in the case of most people it's just shooting blindly for your second and third rounds as opposed to counterpicking. And if you're just shooting blindly then you might as well just play one round, because that's all the others are going to look like anyway.

It's funny because he plays Brawl.
They have a counterpick system that can actually function in a way that makes sense. Pokemon doesn't (and for the most part can't) have that. The only way to really do that is to only run one team the entire tournament and have two or three Pokemon (full sets) on the side that you can sub in for ones on your current team at the end of the match; loser being the only one allowed to do so. But then you have to keep track of who used what and it could become a huge hassle for the person running the tournament, not to mention the fact that some people like to switch things up half way through the tournament or something.

Or be a real man and just use the same team both rounds all matches like me. Then again that might be why I don't make it far....oh well.
Probably.
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
Are you guys really just now complaining about a rule that we've had for every PC tourney ever?
 

Wave⁂

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
11,870
Chibo isn't complaining, he bringing up a point that we've taken for granted up until now.
 

Wrath`

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 13, 2007
Messages
4,824
Location
Binghamton, NY
My reasoning is almost the same as Chibo's, except in the case of most people it's just shooting blindly for your second and third rounds as opposed to counterpicking. And if you're just shooting blindly then you might as well just play one round, because that's all the others are going to look like anyway.


.
SO in essence it's not really 2 out of 3 but more or less two best of 1. It's probably why I like best two of three, as if my team loses the first round and I don't switch, there is a good chance it will do better against another team with the same team I just used.
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
Chibo isn't complaining, he bringing up a point that we've taken for granted up until now.
ok, I will say that it could be something worth discussing. I really don't think this is an appropriate thread to discuss it in though.

I'm going to continue to run this tournament as best 2 of 3 because the only person who has a major problem with it dropped out of the tourney. If you guys want to keep talking about this, talk about it in the tournament discussion thread.
 

CT Chia

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
24,416
Location
Philadelphia
More than just me think it's potentially an issue, no need to single me out. TO's are able to use whatever rule they want.

However I'm back in. I'm bored and reading about Steelix taking out a couple pokes in ubers is fun. Makes me feel like I can make an unconventional team and still compete since I don't play ubers that much, if at all. It'll be fun.

vVv ChiboSempai
EST
Chibo
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
TO's are able to use whatever rule they want.
If this is what you believe then why did you ***** about it in the first place?

However I'm back in.
I'll allow it, but if you pull this **** again I'm blacklisting you.

I'm bored and reading about Steelix taking out a couple pokes in ubers is fun. Makes me feel like I can make an unconventional team and still compete since I don't play ubers that much, if at all. It'll be fun.
http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=12080140&postcount=421
So yeah, a team with Steelix can beat a team of 6 choice scarfed pokemon. BIG ****ING DEAL.

Here's a list of pokemon who can beat Steelix:

http://www.smogon.com/dp/tiers/uber

And for that matter, here's a list of pokemon who can beat Slowbro:

http://www.smogon.com/dp/tiers/uber

It just really annoys me that you thought I was playing seriously that match.
 

CT Chia

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
24,416
Location
Philadelphia
wow y r u so mad lol. I guess that outside this one time I'm not allowed to drop out and sign back up? Should be my own problem, like if it were to fill up before I get back in then I wouldn't be able to sign up. How is that even remotely blacklistable?

TOs are able to use whatever rule they want but players also don't have to be forced to play anything specific, aka me dropping out at first

Also not my fault you switched in a skymin onto the steelix lol
And why would you not play serious in a BOTW match? Kind of ruins the fun for spectators that voted you there
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
wow y r u so mad lol. I guess that outside this one time I'm not allowed to drop out and sign back up? Should be my own problem, like if it were to fill up before I get back in then I wouldn't be able to sign up. How is that even remotely blacklistable?
It's just annoying and I don't want other people to do it. I really shouldn't have allowed you entry at all, but we need signups so I decided to allow it.

Also not my fault you switched in a skymin onto the steelix lol
Yeah, that was a dumb mistake on my part. I should've known that kirbyraeg had better prediction than to EQ twice in a row. That one mistake pretty much lost me the game. I should've switched to Palkia and Surfed.

And why would you not play serious in a BOTW match? Kind of ruins the fun for spectators that voted you there
Here's a better question, why would I:

A. Use my real team when there's a tournament in the same format coming up.
B. Take it seriously when there's nothing on the line.
C. Take it seriously when my opponent does not/probably has never played Ubers.

That **** is just dumb. If I used a real team people who are in my bracket could just go back and metagame their teams to beat mine. It's like announcing to everyone that I'm going to always use a certain pokemon on all my teams because it's my favorite. It's a really bad idea since people can easily prepare for it.

Nobody actually tries in BOTW. Pink Reaper got selected for it once against me. He used a team of Choiced U-Turn pokemon.
 

kirbyraeg

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
6,440
Location
in Makai
I tried in other botw :(

Not so much the ubers one though lol

edit: Hey, smashboards hiatus.

You'll see me in a few weeks.

Take me off the signups.
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
We're not starting until next Friday. Are you sure you won't be back by then?
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
Signups appear to be slowing down, so I may as well bring this up now.

So I'm thinking that if this tournament gets less than 13 entrants it would kind of be a waste to do a 16 person bracket since 1/3 or more of the people would have byes round 1. What I'm thinking of doing instead is having single elimination best of 1 round robin pools and making a bracket of 8 out of the top few players in those pools. Would anyone support this? Would anyone have any strong objections?
 

CT Chia

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
24,416
Location
Philadelphia
A 13 person round robin what? That's 156 matches!

What is so bad about byes? People in the PC need to stop seeing them as taboo. It's standard stuff, go through the tourney results section here on SWF and look at the brackets. Practically all of them have them, it's standard procedure.
 

CT Chia

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Sep 4, 2007
Messages
24,416
Location
Philadelphia
Pool 1
3 People
6 Matches

Pool 2
3 People
6 Matches

Pool 3
3 People
6 Matches

Pool 4
4 People
12 Matches

That's still 30 more matches you have to coordinate

It doesn't matter however many people get byes, it's literally how brackets are designed, there is nothing wrong with it. Also, if a person doesn't get a bye in winners, then the loser of the round 1 match gets a bye in losers, putting them to where they would be if they had lost in round 2 of winners. It's just that the people who don't get a r1 bye and win a match end up playing one extra match than everyone else does, but you can see it as "qualifying" for round 2 similar to the pool system that Gate's is proposing.

It's up to Gates to decide what to do, I'm just trying to help out and offer my knowledge
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
If we get 13 people I'll do a 16 person bracket. And for a best of 1 format, which is what the pools will likely be, there would only be 3 matches total in each pool.

This also helps seed the bracket since I can pair firsts with seconds and such.
 

Terywj [태리]

Charismatic Maknae~
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
30,536
Location
香港 & 서울
Chibo is supposedly just voicing his opinion.

Doesn't really matter since Gates can run this however the **** he wants. Worst scenario Chibo just drops out again.
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
It's ok, I just wish you could've answered me sooner when I told you when signups would be over.
 

kirbyraeg

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
6,440
Location
in Makai
It was more the fact that I wasn't sure when it would be over that caused me to not respond. I had some stuff to take care of, but things happened that simplified it a lot for me, so I'm back sooner than expected.
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
That's cool. I understand.

So, can we get a final verdict on who is opposed to pools and who isn't?
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
Today is the LAST DAY to sign up.

Also, since we now have exactly 12 people, it's very unlikely that we'll be doing pools.
 

Gates

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Mar 22, 2008
Messages
9,316
Bracket was randomly seeded and only slightly adjusted to minimize byes:


ROUND 1 ENDS 2/25/2011 11:59 PM EST
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom