Traitorous and dishonest? That's putting a bit much on it, isn't buddy? Bowserlick isn't saying he should say a character he
doesn't want just to make
some fans happy. He's saying he could've said a character that he did want that a sizable amount of the dedicated smash fan base also wants. Like here Rich says he wants Ridley
http://www.ign.com/articles/2011/05/28/what-we-want-in-a-new-smash-bros?page=2. If he would've said Ridley to sakurai how would that have been traitorous or dishonest? I'm not saying he should've said someone more popular just that Bowserlick isn't wrong in wanting him too.
VVV To be honest I would but I know I'm in the minority.
I'm saying it's wrong that Bowserlick wants the journalist to say something he doesn't mean. That is dishonesty because it is a lie. It is a lie because it is untrue. It is traitorous because he is betraying himself. I would never want anyone to lie to me or others about their intentions at all, no games to play and no subtleties to hurt with. This is the standard I hold everyone to, there can be no compromise or exception, but this does not imply there cannot be degrees of traitorhood or dishonesty or lying. If he said something like "Ridley", it would be a relatively very minor more venial lie more at variance with this law and standard rather than directly opposed.
The operative I'm using here is
who the journalist wants most.
Wait a second, did Sakurai even ask
most wanted? Probably not explicitly, but it was implied, he was giving him one option and directing it to personal preference.
Well, if that's somehow not what Sakurai meant or the interviewer guy heard, then I am in the wrong.
That is the point of the interview. To report new information. If you read a lot of interview you would notice that the reporter usually asks questions that are off limits anyways. They usually get a typical response like, "we aren't releasing any details regarding that as of yet". It isn't being traitorous or dishonest. It is doing your job.
The expression, "it can't hurt to try" comes to mind. Attempting to fish for any new information will eventually give you hits on your website or whatever. Journalism has always been about this. It hasn't devolved. I guess it hasn't really evolved either.
I don't see what this response has to do with anything that I said. We're talking about the journalist's response to Sakurai's questions at the end of the interview. I really don't think there is even one example where him responding differently would have lead to more hits in any clearly measurable amount. Something that's not outlandish and somehow assumes that Sakurai wouldn't respond exactly how he did that is. Because it's safe to say Sakurai probably would have responded and reacted near the same if he said "Yoshimitsu and Anna" sans the multi-character problems on the 3DS.
