D
Deleted member
Guest
I fail to see why not being a animal/monster with humanoidish character is an issue here. What matters more is if the character would bring in people to the game, would be unique, can fit in, a character's importance and popularity as well. Ridley has all of this, which makes him a likely addition.Its not that, its just that Smash doesnt include animal/monster type characters unless they are humanoidish. The only exceptions to this are things from the Pokemon series, which still has Lucario and Mewtwo being humanoid. I simply couldnt see him getting in with the others in terms of Artstyle/look at all.
It's for this reason why I'm confident that Mewtwo is going to return and also have a really good feeling about Ridley, Roy and Dixie Kong getting in the next game at all. Unfortunately, I think Sukapon is still probably out, given that his issue wasn't due to not working out, but more to do with his obscurity.One thing worth noting about Villager is how much of his moveset reflects the ideas scrapped for Brawl Sakurai talked about in Famitsu (if you need a link check Tri's information thread). Villager proves that when it comes to Sakurai, no plan is ever truly thrown away. He is always willing, and likely, to pull from what he couldn't do. Even with the rumored Little Mac, who was a Assist Trophy that by nature was considered not good enough to be playable; and Mii, who was also rejected much like Villager as they were too casual; we see how his opinions can change with time. So while Sukapon may not have worked for one game, he may work for another. All in all I'm glad that Sakurai has reminded us once again that just when we think we know what he is going to do -- he turns the tables. Villager broke the mold, yet made absolute sense why he should be playable.