First off, this seems pretty ridiculously dead to me.
Second, way to completely contradict yourself, and start off saying that how tournament players do don't matter, when they are the most plausible standard, while afterwards saying that olimar isn't low because zap owned you with him, how does that make any sense?
If someone isn't doing well in tournaments, theres no way to better say that hes low tier, if fox never won any matches in melee, even with his shine being so ridiculous, do you still think he would ahve been top tier?