κomıc
Highly Offensive
Oh, I'm not calling him a female. I'm just saying the series lacked females up until now and is still lacking villains. Sorry lolWait wait wait
Girahim Is male I believe (I could be wrong since I barely heard of him)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Oh, I'm not calling him a female. I'm just saying the series lacked females up until now and is still lacking villains. Sorry lolWait wait wait
Girahim Is male I believe (I could be wrong since I barely heard of him)
Double postKing K. Rool still has a chance (especially since the Kremlings are in Smash Run), Mewtwo can still get in despite the 'Pokemon can never get more reps than Mario crap', Ridley's chances are diminishing but he still has a chance. I am still hoping for a character some people won't see coming, Black Shadow.
You're grammer stinks.
I've seen that before alongside the Finn (Adventure Time) in Smash pic. What the hell is that snowman?
----
lol you should stop with the grammar nazi thing. Your virginity is showing.You're*
Yes I fully support your point but some people believe that Pokemon had 4 slots and Pokemon Trainer is 1 character while Sakurai specifically states that he counts Ivysaur, Charizard and Squirtle as seperate characters.Double post
You do realize brawl had 4 reps pokemon have 6 (wario and yoshi came by they're own series)
It's official...this thread got really bad now...lol you should stop with the grammar nazi thing. Your virginity is showing.
Insults? Mate you should've just stopped at the grammar nazi thing. It's just a correction. Calm down.lol you should stop with the grammar nazi thing. Your virginity is showing.
Yeah it was a hand flipping off the cameraA question regarding the Chrom screencap: whatever obscenity cut out was not part of game? A hand next to screen or something, right?
I am calm i'm just telling that ITS showing, not gonna dwell on this since its disrespectful to the moderators if i continue like this. Next time they should think before testing me.Insults? Mate you should've just stopped at the grammar nazi thing. It's just a correction. Calm down.
I say the picture is fake for one reason:A question regarding the Chrom screencap: whatever obscenity cut out was not part of game? A hand next to screen or something, right?
Please do... Put this thread out of its misery... It's not humane... We can start a new life! We can live underground and use bacon for clothes!You all are really asking for a temporary closing again. I suggest getting back onto something a little more related to the topic of this thread.
The leaker claimed that inside drifting would return, a point which is fairly convincingly refuted by other posters later in the thread. At best, the veracity of the leaker's information is up for debate.Could someone post the exact information of the Mario Kart leak about Mario Kart itself? The only way we are going to debunk the leak before Smash release is by seeing if everything it said about Mario Kart came true.
Is that all he claimed? I mean Mario kart already has open information in the web, we can check gameplay videos, the roster. All of his information is verifiable now. We should get on that.The leaker claimed that inside drifting would return, a point which is fairly convincingly refuted by other posters later in the thread. At best, the veracity of the leaker's information is up for debate.
Is confirmed fake, it was done from the same person that post it in 4chan (I think it was from there). Is a really good modified version of Marth.Well the mods sure didn't like that image. (They must really not like Chris Bores)
Allow me to post the non-rude version of Chrom:
The lack of clipping proves it's fake. That's why the Palutena one looks legit, it has some type of clipping.Well the mods sure didn't like that image. (They must really not like Chris Bores)
Allow me to post the non-rude version of Chrom:
Doing the math, he almost doesn't have a choice but to save some characters to reveal after release. Let's say there's 47 characters in the final games. Right now we've seen 26. Based on past patterns, let's assume two character reveals in every month except June, in which we could get five because of E3. So that's 26+5=31, then adding two for each month until release. If release is early September, that would end up being 31+6=37. Then let's just add one for the rest of April and one for the beginning of September. That brings us to 39 out of 47 revealed. So unless there is another Smash Bros. Direct before or at the time of the 3DS launch, we will go into the game not knowing somewhere around eight characters, probably.So, does that mean he might pull that stunt again? Even after the game released, he still showed updates about the unlockable characters and stages, but hid them for risk of spoilers.
Based on what he has said about his disappointment with how everything these days leaks onto the Internet as soon as a game is released so fans are not rewarded or surprised as much as the creators would like, I am expecting either: A. Many of the characters we have seen will be unlockables and we won't know which until we play the game because he is not making a big deal about their secret nature pre-release due to the Internet. or B. There will be no unlockable characters because Sakurai's view, again due to the Internet, is "What's the point?"Speaking of which, do we know if any of the announced characters are unlocks? Sakurai pulled the same stunt with Brawl. "Ooh look, Sonic and Snake are in the game! Now all you have to do is play 20 hours of Brawls and play on a certain stage 15 times or go through an entire mode that takes hours to complete".
Apparently the Palutena was deemed fake because it held resemblence to the Saria trophy.On the last page
The lack of clipping proves it's fake. That's why the Palutena one looks legit, it has some type of clipping.
Yeah go ahead please, I'd like to see it.Apparently the Palutena was deemed fake because it held resemblence to the Saria trophy.
I can bring up the picture if you need it.
Here you go.Yeah go ahead please, I'd like to see it.
See I guess I can kind of see that, but also, I always felt that this picture seemed off compared to the other one. I'm not to sure why, like her face is different in one pic compared to the other. But still, I don't see the similarity to it. Maybe it's just me though.
That still doesn't explain the rest of the flippin' body.
Kinda see it, but kinda don't.
I've been comparing both of the pic, but I just can't see the similarity with the eyes, if the original and this were side by side it might be easier to determine.
It can be seen, but it's a stretch I think... Especially considering the rest of her body.