THIS. Why are people so against one of gaming's biggest legends and icons than they are a generic avatar representation?
I can't speak for everybody, but I know the reason I'm okay with the idea of a Mii, but not so much with Pac Man, is because Miis are Nintendo All-Stars. I don't doubt Pac Man as a video game legend, but he isn't a Nintendo character. And it isn't that I hate Pac Man, I just want an extreme minimum of third parties compared to how many actual Nintendo characters show up (I also had a huge problem with Snake being in Brawl, and will admit that Pac Man is definitely the lesser of two evils, in my opinion).
Now, as for this Butternut leak, I'm finding it to be too safe. Quite a few cuts and only characters people expect...but no heavy hitters outside of Mega Man and Mewtwo. It's playing it so safe that, should it be the official roster, a lot of hype would be sucked out of the game for me.
-Nothing against Dixie Kong, but K. Rool really should be in first, especially with the fan base he has developed. His exclusion would feel a tad like a slap in the face, honestly.
-I also feel like it's counterproductive to include both Palutena and Krystal, two characters who have been defended as unique characters via "staffs".
-Another part of that roster that irks me is the Pokemon selection. I know that Brawl+Mewtwo is everyone's ideal Pokemon representation, but part of me has a hunch that Game Freak will want some Gen 5 representation. Whether that's through a completely Fairy-tized Jigglypuff or through Victini, I don't know. In short, something other than the norm is a very real possibility.
-Toon Zelda. Sakurai emphasizes uniqueness with Villager, WFT, Mega Man, Rosalina, and Little Mac, and then includes Toon Zelda. If Toon Link is any indicator, Toon Zelda would be an unecessary clone character. Why would Sakurai add an unnecessary clone Newcomer when he has already stated how minimal the Newcomer inclusion will be?
-Sakurai has already said that as of now, no characters are planned to be cut. How come the four characters cut are the ones that, coincidentally enough, people label as the most likely to get cut? Wouldn't they all technically be planned until time has officially run out on developing any additional characters?
-Overall, every character added is a character who is speculated to have a chance. No heavy-hitters except for a few characters we already know are confirmed, and cuts that have long been speculated as possible at a point in time when cuts may not have even been considered (let's also remember two confirmed vets who were on the tip of the Cut Iceberg but were confirmed anyway). Nothing sticks out and, if anything, this just kind of looks like a wishlist that is sensitive to some fanbases and quite harsh to others. That's my two cents'.