I'm back from work. I read through all the pages.
I honestly hope I'm not annoying anyone with my optimism, but I saw the comparison of old and new Mario, and the color change.
I must say...that almost everything brought up in regards to this leak...makes it look real.
Anything that goes against it being real from what I've seen is grasping at straws.
Well first, the angle:
It can't just be the angle. With them and the trees that close you would've have at least see some of the platforms. Or Mario and Palutena be seen at an angle.
Second, the models. Fine, they're probably not imported. But, that doesn't mean you can't make them. I understand that's "grasping for straws" but you can't rule that out. People aren't stupid, many could easily make a convincing pic using Photoshop. Remember the Ness and Jigglypuff "leak"? The same happens here.
Oh, and.
Look, there! A texture! Maybe I could use that!
"But why?" you may ask. Simple, look what it's done. Two pictures have caused all these threads to go nuts. Now I don't know 'bout you, but that's more than makes up for the effort.
And for others. I'm not against Palutena's inclusion. I'm just saying there's something wrong but I can't figure it out.
The problem with this concept is first off, the view of the background in the Palutena pictures don't exist elsewhere. So the leaker would have had to go through a lot of time and effort to get a random model of Mario, Palutena (editing her dress, face, and staff, whilst outlining all but the bulb) and the background.
If you look closely at the outline of Palutena, you can see that at some parts, the line gets a bit more transparent, which is consistent with several 3DS pics, including the one that revealed Luigi's flutter jump. This would mean that, if fake, the leaker would have to likely be very, very specific and make certain parts transparent to match other pictures.
Also, if fake, the leaker would have then covered his tracks
perfectly. PERFECTLY. In most leaks, there are blemishes in the photo such as blurry spots, or they're just god awful to the point that it's clearly obvious that the pic is fake.
I'm not totally buying what you're saying. I COULD see the problem with the Battlefield trees, but even then, we don't know the angles of the camera. For all we know, the tree on the right could be at the very tip, while the other one is in plain view.
EDIT: I'd also like to mention, that if he DID create his own background, that the leaker ONCE AGAIN matched the median pattern, the one that would make both halves connect, seamlessly. Everything in this picture looks natural as far as the background.
It is my opinion, that to prove this fake, it is not focusing on Palutena that is the focus, but MARIO. We've seen Mario countless times. If there is something noticeably wrong, it can be pointed out.
However, with the comparison of those Mario pictures, I can't argue with it.