Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
A mafia form of hard evidence is more someone having is something that almost definitely says mafia.QUOTE]
"having is something that", WTF?
This post by eorlingas (#788) is total bs, of coarse you know if you saved someone…they didn’t die along with whether if anyone else died…its that simple…Since when did Doctors know if they actually saved someone? No one does that.
Post 789 by eorlingas is the main focus of this whole post…real doctor
DON'T COME OUT TO SMITE HIM
But now its:Thing is, I think that is his real role
AndThe more productive of the two would be to lynch Smashman
What happened to believing him eor? Hmmm…??? O yea that’s right, your mafia, and don’t care who dies as long as it isn’t another mafia scum member…I really cannot think of anything else.
Vote: Smashman90
Info flash: just because you targeted to save someone does not mean that they where targeted to dieThis post by eorlingas (#788) is total bs, of coarse you know if you saved someone…they didn’t die along with whether if anyone else died…its that simple…
Because if Smashman is mafia, they get the doc. Do you not remember the first Smashpark mafia?Post 789 by eorlingas is the main focus of this whole post…
WHY would you NOT want the doctor to come out and smite him…that way you are guaranteed a dead mafia one way or the other…
Proof for anything you said? If I was the only one who believed him, you'd a small point. I'm not.eorlingas has only one reason why the doctor shouldn’t come out…because he is mafia…this is why eorlingas said before that he believed smashman BECAUSE HE HAS TO BE THE DOC!!! Eor, since he is mafia, knows that smashman must be telling the truth and decided to say that he believed him which he does
Again, you have no proof or basis for what you say. You believe I'm mafia, and so you're making up outrageous "strategies" that i'm doing whenever I do something that benefits the town. It's circular logic, and circular logic does not work.see, by allowing the real doc to go unlynched as eor had planned, the mafia could lead the town into killing another townie and then the mafia could kill smashman and that would be that!
It stagnated because people tried to lynch me and I proved their arguments false. Lance still hasn't brought those posts he claims he has up.But all did not go well for eor’s plan…the game started to stagnate
Um, nothing. I still do believe him. Where did I claim otherwise? Considering the rest of your post is based on the fact that you think I said something I didn't, i'd say that it's a terrible argument. I said Smashman would be the more "productive" lynch, not that I all of a sudden stopped believing him. If we lynch him, either we find out he's the doctor, or that he's mafia. That is productive. If we let him live, and he dies during the night, then it's still productive. But if he lives, then we have a full second day debating about Smashman. Lynching him solves it, without there being a doubt. What good does lynching an inactive do? Inactives simply don't play the game that much. It could be a terrible mafia ploy, or it could be that they just don't play the game that much. I've been inactive a ton of times, simply because i lost interest, and I've been both mafia and town when that happens. Unless we're incredibly lucky and find a mafia player, then it'd just be a random lynch. And the odds are in a random lynch that we'd kill a town. Besides that, I still believe that Spam_Master is suspicious. As I've said. If smashman is the doctor, like I still believe, then I'd vote for him.which is why most of you are considering voting inactives or as eor just did vote smashman for a lynch…this is a MASSIVE flip that further shows he is mafia…he believes him as seen in this quote (post #797):
But now its:
And
What happened to believing him eor? Hmmm…???
So if that's the truth, why would I go against killing the doctor? If I have no opinion on who would die, then why would I do that?O yea that’s right, your mafia, and don’t care who dies as long as it isn’t another mafia scum member…
Are you ****ing serious? You're AGAIN going back to the "Hey dr_twist what's your alignment", even though I've crushed all arguments against it several times? Jesus christ man.Of coarse most of you are wondering, what about day 1??? Well eorlingas saw an opportunity as mafia to pick on a townie or at least someone who is anti-mafia…to his luck he said all the wrong things and even made the rest of us think that he was anti-town…which inherently is no ones fault…
You make an excellent point. If he's the doctor your mafia, and if he's mafia your mafia. This leaves only one outcome, your mafia. Thanks for letting us all know your mafia.If smashman is the doctor, then I'm mafia and so therefore knew it. If he is mafia, then I'm just defending a mafia player they believe I'm allied with.
yea your point is what?, the whole thing is to get a mafia player...not to allow one to slip by...Because if Smashman is mafia, they get the doc. Do you not remember the first Smashpark mafia?
care to reword? that makes no senseProof for anything you said? If I was the only one who believed him, you'd a small point. I'm not.
its not curcular logic, i showed you are mafia through the fact you would rather let a mafia slip away...i then followed this up by explaining what your plans were in connection that you were mafiaAgain, you have no proof or basis for what you say. You believe I'm mafia, and so you're making up outrageous "strategies" that i'm doing whenever I do something that benefits the town. It's circular logic, and circular logic does not work.
it stagnated b/c people couldn't get on and had little else to say, but i do...It stagnated because people tried to lynch me and I proved their arguments false. Lance still hasn't brought those posts he claims he has up.
why is lynching somebody who YOU believe to be truthful with his claim productive...that makes absolutely no sense...you believe him wholeheartedly but are willing to lynch him...your productivity BS is just that BS...an attempt to hide behing language that you can manipulate...Um, nothing. I still do believe him. Where did I claim otherwise? Considering the rest of your post is based on the fact that you think I said something I didn't, i'd say that it's a terrible argument. I said Smashman would be the more "productive" lynch, not that I all of a sudden stopped believing him. If we lynch him, either we find out he's the doctor, or that he's mafia. That is productive. If we let him live, and he dies during the night, then it's still productive. But if he lives, then we have a full second day debating about Smashman. Lynching him solves it, without there being a doubt.
so you willingly want to kill a town member...thats mafia to meIf smashman is the doctor, like I still believe, then I'd vote for him.
i answered that already...in my last postSo if that's the truth, why would I go against killing the doctor? If I have no opinion on who would die, then why would I do that?
Who said anything about slipping away? I had a full strategy made up and posted about making sure we knew if Smashman was telling the truth. Several pages back. It involved asking the cop to investigate Smashman, and I asked if people agreed. No one answered, and all of this stuff happened.yea your point is what?, the whole thing is to get a mafia player...not to allow one to slip by...
My bad on that. You claimed I was mafia because I believed Smashman. I said that, if I was the only person who believed smashman when no one else did, you'd have a small point. However, because I'm not (common and Pythag also believe me at the least), it's a baseless claim.care to reword? that makes no sense
No, that is not proof. That is you just stating what you believe because you believe I am mafia. If I am not mafia, then everything you say is false. If evidence is only evidence if the conclusion you have already concluded is accepted, then it is not evidence.its not curcular logic, i showed you are mafia through the fact you would rather let a mafia slip away...i then followed this up by explaining what your plans were in connection that you were mafia
It stagnated because no one other then you and Lance believed it.it stagnated b/c people couldn't get on and had little else to say, but i do...
I answered that in the bottom half of that post. Here, I'll restate it againwhy is lynching somebody who YOU believe to be truthful with his claim productive...that makes absolutely no sense
I also accept the possibility that I'm wrong.me said:If we lynch him, either we find out he's the doctor, or that he's mafia. That is productive. If we let him live, and he dies during the night, then it's still productive. But if he lives, then we have a full second day debating about Smashman. Lynching him solves it, without there being a doubt.
What's this?...you believe him wholeheartedly but are willing to lynch him...your productivity BS is just that BS...an attempt to hide behing language that you can manipulate...
Ahahahaha. You're manipulating what I say just there, then trying to yell at me for doing nothing of the sort. Where have I said that I am 100% positive that Smashman is the doctor? I believe him. Not whole heartily....you believe him wholeheartedly but are willing to lynch him...your productivity BS is just that BS...an attempt to hide behing language that you can manipulate...
Answered alreadyso you willingly want to kill a town member...thats mafia to me
Yes, but it didn't match with what you claimed there. In the rest of your post, you claimed that I was feverant that Smashman wasn't lynched, even though I think he's town, and then in that quote you claimed I didn't care who got lynched as long as they're not mafia. It doesn't match up.i answered that already...in my last post