I'd like to bring stuff up against Kirbyoshi. Simple things I've noted so far that make me think he isn't a townie. If you look at it, it does show that he really was just being useless for town. He wasn't playing well like he should have. He just sort of did what he did. This doesn't mean 100% that I think he's a confirmed scum. He could be some variation of an indy for all I know. But it's obvious to me that he shouldn't be allowed to keep being wishy-washy like he is.
@Sold: Much like Nix said (half-jokingly, but still), he (Nix) should be the only one trying to lead this game. If scum can assume a leadership role, they can pretty much make town believe anything. If town assumes that role, they just make themselves NK targets. Therefore, scum has more incentive to take charge than town does. Get it?
Kirbyoshi in this post basically told town not to form a leader. After this, basically everyone stepped down from this role and no one has really tried to assume it. TBH, there's nothing really wrong with a leader. Scum can use a WIFOM on us, so what? Are we relying on them being NK'd? No. So what if they don't die. That shouldn't be a determinate of whether or not someone is scum. In this case he basically had us not use a possibly beneficial leader by creating a WIFOM situation. Pri bad.
Swords: My issue was that you were voting Sir Bed on the possibility that he was scum. Since there is an equally viable town reason for it, I see no reason whatsoever for the vote.
Now he's trying to discourage voting on the possibility that someone is scum. What? A vote is a players most valuable tool. He then said not to use it.
I agree. It could be WIFOM, but Swords was scummy yesterday, so...
Vote: SwordsRbroken
He even stated in this post that there was a WIFOM based on the NK. He then continues to play upon the scum WIFOM and vote for Swords. Really? He could have given some backing to his vote in another way, but he didn't and mindlessly voted for Swords.
Ok, I see where you're coming from Rockin.
Unvote
But still IGMEOY Swords. And I'm not quite sure what we can get out of the NK...
"Oh noes! They voted me b/c I did something stupid. Better cover up my tracks."
Now before you say "Oh well rPSI, you said that voting for Swords was scummy, so isn't it stupid to keep my vote on him?" Honestly, this really only shows that you're willing to do whatever it takes to prove that you're not a "bad person" by keeping a vote on someone. If you really think that your vote was legitimate for reasons outside the WIFOM, then you should keep your vote there. Otherwise this just proves that you were blindly throwing that vote against Swords.
