Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Man
nah they're just misunderstoodThey're still all evil villains. Except Joker who is just evil in the eyes of society and not actually.
Tara Strong staying best woman va...lovelyAs far as I can tell she seems to be in favor of researching each individual vaccine, not against the idea of them in general. Certainly still worth raising an eyebrow given the rigorous testing and validation that goes into even introducing a vaccine, but like you said it's pretty inaccurate to characterize her as an anti-vaxxer.
Here's the tweet thread; https://twitter.com/tarastrong/status/986608362686066688
This kind of attitude is why legitimatly horrible people are still able to hold influence over society.nah they're just misunderstood
Tara Strong staying best woman va...lovely
This kind of attitude is why legitimatly horrible people are still able to hold influence over society.nah they're just misunderstood
Tara Strong staying best woman va...lovely
This kind of attitude is why legitimatly horrible people are still able to hold influence over society.nah they're just misunderstood
Tara Strong staying best woman va...lovely
They're also cartoons and thus not real.This kind of attitude is why legitimatly horrible people are still able to hold influence over society.
We convay our values through our media.They're also cartoons and thus not real.
Oh come off it Snake lol.We convay our values through our media.
Jokes aside, while I do think this to be true, I also believe most people have the ability to separate fictional villains from real ones. This is doubly true for worlds like Mario's where violence takes the form of unrealistic cartoon slapstick.We convay our values through our media.
oh no. there's nothing wrong with liking a villain. But you can't deny that that's what they are. A villain. They aren't "misunderstood".Oh come off it Snake lol.
Every story with a Hero needs a villain foil, and liking the villain doesn't make someone an awful, evil person. Do people who like Bowser as a character suddenly become misogynistic tyrants?
Eh. You never know.Jokes aside, while I do think this to be true, I also believe most people have the ability to separate fictional villains from real ones. This is doubly true for worlds like Mario's where violence takes the form of unrealistic cartoon slapstick.
No one here actually thinks Ganondorf is justified in trying to bring ruin to Hyrule.
I meanoh no. there's nothing wrong with liking a villain. But you can't deny that that's what they are. A villain. They aren't "misunderstood".
Eh. You never know.
Again. There's nothing wrong with liking a bad guy. As long as you can admit that they are a bad guy and that there behavior is not to be emulated and that they are in the wrong. You can like them all you want as long as you can still admit that that is what they are. Evil.I mean
Bowser Jr. in Sunshine: Exists
and then there are indeed plenty of villains who flat out ARE misunderstood, like a lot of Kirby characters for example.
You seem soo hyper-focused in this belief that people who like bad guys are gonna grow up to be bad guys, and like.....no? This is legit Soccer Mom Snake logic.
Tell me with a straight face that King DeDeDe, a bad guy who always fights for the side of good when he's able to and his actions commonly get misconstruction as malicious despite being helpful, is evil.Again. There's nothing wrong with liking a bad guy. As long as you can admit that they are a bad guy and that there behavior is not to be emulated and that they are in the wrong. You can like them all you want as long as you can still admit that that is what they are. Evil.
He was certainly a **** in the first game where he stole all the food from Dreamland.Tell me with a straight face that King DeDeDe, a bad guy who always fights for the side of good when he's able to and his actions commonly get misconstruction as malicious despite being helpful, is evil.
You view things in such a black and white way of sight, it's sad.
Now THAT we can agree on. You can't get that specific about it because then it's literally impossible to have a non problematic portrayal of literally anything. It's the cinema sins way of looking at things.We certainly do portray values through media but not everything portrayed is representative of values.
For example, I don't get when people criticise stories with kingdoms for pushing some kind of fascist nondemocratic agenda when in reality they probably just get used as a stock fantasy setting.
Oh definitely. He's a greedy assholeHe was certainly a **** in the first game where he stole all the food from Dreamland.
I take it you’re not a fan of redemption arcs.Again. There's nothing wrong with liking a bad guy. As long as you can admit that they are a bad guy and that there behavior is not to be emulated and that they are in the wrong. You can like them all you want as long as you can still admit that that is what they are. Evil.
I suppose MLP and MTG are both owned by Hasbro. But even then, I didn't expect MTG to ever do any collaborations like this.Oh you ain’t seen nothing yet.....
Dedede is a reformed villain. He learned his lesson and gave up active villainy a long time ago.Tell me with a straight face that King DeDeDe, a bad guy who always fights for the side of good when he's able to and his actions commonly get misconstruction as malicious despite being helpful, is evil.
You view things in such a black and white way of sight, it's sad.
Except DeDeDe will still gladly get in Kirby's way if he's able to if he believes what he's doing is in the right.Dedede is a reformed villain. He learned his lesson and gave up active villainy a long time ago.
As opposed to a character like Bowser who's always up to something and realistically will never change.
Man you might be evil too, dog.
I can't recall Wario ever doing anything without the express motivation of self-enrichment.Oh definitely. He's a greedy asshole
But so is Wario, and by Snake's logic, Wario would be a 'good' guy since he's not commonly portrayed as a villain anymore(if at all).
Redemption arcs are fine. And they can happen. But if Bowser was redeemed for example, that wouldn't suddenly make all the bad things he did no longer bad things. It wouldn't mean he was suddenly a good guy the entire time. And it wouldn't mean that his evil beliefs were right.I take it you’re not a fan of redemption arcs.
If you buy it for me, then sure I'll give it a shake. But I probably wouldn't be able to engage with it very well. The only, literally only way, I was able to enjoy FFVII's story was by using the built in cheats on the switch port so I was basically watching a movie.
I mean, why are you assuming that Wario's self-enrichment is justified in the first place?I can't recall Wario ever doing anything without the express motivation of self-enrichment.
Nintendo should give him 3 adorable nephews that teach him the values of family and charity.
Redemption arcs are fine. And they can happen. But if Bowser was redeemed for example, that wouldn't suddenly make all the bad things he did no longer bad things. It wouldn't mean he was suddenly a good guy the entire time. And it wouldn't mean that his evil beliefs were right.
If you buy it for me, then sure I'll give it a shake. But I probably wouldn't be able to engage with it very well. The only, literally only way, I was able to enjoy FFVII's story was by using the built in cheats on the switch port so I was basically watching a movie.
This kind of attitude is why legitimatly horrible people are still able to hold influence over society.
This kind of attitude is why legitimatly horrible people are still able to hold influence over society.
Super Smash Boards: Three QuotesThis kind of attitude is why legitimatly horrible people are still able to hold influence over society.
unbelievably evil
Bowser did this to give gamers something to doImma just gonna drop this here while it's still relevant.
Bowser still did nothing wrong.As opposed to a character like Bowser who's always up to something and realistically will never change.
That just makes him an antihero. And anyway, I’m not talking about that kind of thing. Because it is possible for heroes to be misinformed or uneducated about the situation and accidentally act in the wrong. But that doesn’t mean they have malicious intent. That doesn’t mean they’re going out with the express goal of killing and conquering and causing mass destruction. It’s two completely different types of character.Except DeDeDe will still gladly get in Kirby's way if he's able to if he believes what he's doing is in the right.
So is he still a reformed villain if he's more than willing to get in the way of the Hero's path?
Again, morality isn't black and white, there's various shades of grey between the two.
If it hasn’t melted by her conversations with us, it has to be more durable than we think.I feel like Snake's mind would just
Melt
If she experienced the plot of a mainline SMT game.
I meanThat just makes him an antihero. And anyway, I’m not talking about that kind of thing. Because it is possible for heroes to be misinformed or uneducated about the situation and accidentally act in the wrong. But that doesn’t mean they have malicious intent. That doesn’t mean they’re going out with the express goal of killing and conquering and causing mass destruction. It’s two completely different types of character.
Yeah. He is a villain. Protagonist, as y’all have painstakingly informed me of many a time, does not equal hero. Just because the story is about Wario does not make him the hero.I mean, why are you assuming that Wario's self-enrichment is justified in the first place?
He's literally out there robbing tombs and beating up innocent natives for his own greed, and yet, he's the Hero. How does that make him not a villain by your logic? He's literally unbridled, destructive capitalism in walking form where it's all about him and nothing else matters as long as he gets his money.
He's the walking equivalent of the BP oil spill.
This is the kind of mentality I’m talking about. We let it happen to our fictional characters and now people are doing the same thing to history’s literal biggest monsters.Bowser still did nothing wrong.
...okay he turned Toads into bricks. Bricks shmicks, ONE thing wrong...