I'm sorry, and I may come across as the worst for this, but the legit seething of Smash fans over SNK is...really hilarious in some instances.
There's threads on /v/ and GameFAQS right now that are flat out revisionist in saying Ridley and K.Rool weren't the most wanted picks, but that Geno, Banjo and Isaac were. Others suggest that the Ballot was a farce, or that the development team was supposed to still be referring to it and that "nobody asked for Terry or an SNK rep".
I thought maybe the Smash fanbase had changed more than it actually has.
@Chucklehead Tom put it quite nicely , as the word "deserving" is being thrown around quite a bit. I'm not going to indulge in responding to the concept of a fictional character "deserving" a "slot" in Smash.
It really comes down to this if you ask me:
The Smash fanbase internet bubble has led to the inclusion of some great characters (K.Rool, Ridley, Banjo-Kazooie, the return of Snake and other veterans), but there is still a co-existence of this passive phobia of games/series that aren't "Nintendo" enough. This doesn't mean anybody is a bad person for not wanting 3rd parties or picks they aren't familiar with. But it's completely different once it becomes toxic. Luckily I'd say very few folks here have gotten to that point.
There was literally a thread earlier that suggested fans were crying that Geno was "shafted in favor of this character nobody asked for!" It may have been trolling, but I'm also like, "COME ON BRUH".