YouTube still has no good reason to fall for stuff like this. I can't say I've seen a copyright claim that wasn't wrong in a long time.
It's a tricky situation. And when looking past my personal bias, I can...
understand.
Youtube does not want to be involved in copyright claims made by or against people. They're just the arbiter. A company says, "Hey that's ours!" and the creator says, "No it's not!" and suddenly the safest thing for Youtube to do is go hands-off and take down the content to be safe.
The problem is that that approach is
not in the best interest of the accused creator, and Youtube's content creators are the
only reason Youtube even functions. Without creators, Youtube wouldn't be a thing. But Youtube also doesn't want to take sides on a copyright claim, otherwise they'll be involved if it goes to court. For instance, if the claimant took me to court and Youtube had at any point sided with me, the claimant could then involve Youtube for damages and sue
them in addition to
me. (Hint: Youtube has far more money than I do.)
What's broken about the system is that there's no verification of the claimant. The company who put claims on my stuff does not represent Sunrise or Bandai Namco, the companies they sited for the takedown. If he's not with the copyright holder, then
why is he allowed to make a copyright claim on that company's behalf? What's stopping me from going to any old channel and make a bull**** claim on behalf of an official company to serve my own purposes? I mean, I could make a claim on the other Gundam Wing abridged parody just to kick them off Youtube, and Youtube would probably follow through on it.
Question is, if the process is automated due to the sheer volume of claims, how do you verify a copyright holder is legit? How do you avoid this specific sort of situation happening?