I was thinking about it today and there's only one thing I can really find wrong with this leak: it feels scripted.
I firmly believe that the actual images are almost entirely red herrings, and that the details of the remainder of the leak are what matter, and those are where the whole thing feels the most "scripted" to me.
As I mentioned in the previous thread, Marina and ACP are both real companies, and you can tell from their registrar info that they've been around for a WHILE: Marina's was registered 9/03/2004 and ACP was 3/02/2005 (all of which is publicly available information, btw).
And yet it's the involvement of not one but TWO paper product advertising companies that so perfectly allows the narrative to write itself. We've seen Bricard's former employer (Marina) tell everyone to step the **** off lest they loose the hordes of angry winged lawyers on them for bringing this negative attention to their firm. This is an entirely hollow threat (they can't sue a fake leaker because people got the wrong idea about where a former employee works), but it's the CORRECT reaction that a PLV firm should have to their reputation being compromised.
...Which is what make's ACP's silence THAT much more conspicuous. If Bricard doesn't actually work there and/or they don't work with Nintendo/Bamco, then they should've absolutely published a statement saying so, and we KNOW that this is what they should've done because, what luck! We just so happen to have a second PLV firm present to show us exactly how an innocent PLV firm would react to this kind of speculation.
When potential new clients go to search for info on ACP, they're going to read an AWFUL lot about an employee of ACP allegedly leaking confidential client info, but they're not going to find any sort of official statement rebuking these claims, and that will literally KILL their business in due time.
This, plus the fact that Bricard conveniently had two LinkedIn profiles, including an older one that listed Marina as his employer, is what makes the whole thing feel "scripted", like we were meant to find this info and Marina was intended to show us how a PLV company SHOULD be reacting to this sort of thing.
I feel crazy for even saying this, but at the back of my mind, I wonder if the person behind all of this is none other than Sakurai himself.
I know that's bonkers to even suggest, but what if this whole thing is a carefully orchestrated ruse that he put into place because, given that this is his last SSB game, he wanted to go out like a legend.
There's so much going on here that makes it appear that everything is in chaos, but in a way, doesn't THAT feel kind of scripted as well? All of the insiders and gaming news outlets that seem to not want to discuss THIS particular leak when they've been happy to discuss so many others... Wouldn't Nintendo have told them to "just act casual" if they really wanted the leak downplayed? Their actions just make it that much more suspicious, giving it even more credence.
It wouldn't be the first time a game developer has run an ARG for their fans to unravel, and Sakurai knows just how much the SSB fanbase goes insane over leaks.
Imagine, at the end of all of this, in the final direct, Sakurai reveals that Marina and ACP were in it all along, and then drops the Grinch on us, a character we'd never peg as playable in a thousand years, says, "That's right. It was me all along. Do I know my fans, or what?" and goes down in history as an absolute LEGEND of trickery and misdirection.
It's completely unrealistic, but man, would that be the perfect end to the most insane prerelease hype cycle a game has ever seen or what?