That's not what I said--I never said "Why would he put so much effort into this?" I said this is the most elaborate leak we've ever had, and it's ridiculous to reduce this to "eh, I could have done this in a day if I cared.". To believe it to be fake would be to believe some unlikely assumptions (what you noted was just some, it also includes finding information about their work place, impersonating someone, etc.). All stuff we've gone over. I never, ever said, and it gets frustrating this keeps being misinterpreted, that it would be impossible for someone to fake. Unlikely, when put into the context of everything else surrounding it.
There are far more convincing arguments for why it could be fake (e.g., changing workplaces, too many characters in one month, etc), the background nitpicks are at the very bottom of the concerns. The fact that nothing was found, after days of sleuthing, that is *conclusive* is the issue. All it takes is *one* thing he missed for everything to fall apart. Maybe it's still out there, and we missed it. But if we can't come up with anything more conclusive than we currently have, it lends *credence* to it's validity, doesn't mean it's true.