Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
The idea of this being a group illuminati effort sounds even improbable than it being one person. Yes, it's possible for this to be fake. A lot of things are possible. But is it probable? Is it probable someone is going to go through all this effort just to make a fake smash leak? Even the other Smash leak I listed as an example, the rayman one, the creator got a lot of fame and started a youtube channel and following thanks to it. He got a ton out of all the work he put into his fake leak. This leak would require a LOT of work and wouldn't give the person anything in return, maybe even put them at risk due to impliciting a company and an individual. So is it probable someone would make this fake leak and for so many things to line up with it?People keep saying that the leaker had to do this and the leaker had to do that and YES, the person would!!! But we have no idea if this is a group effort. Not only that but they could have been working on this ever since Isabelle reveal. With a group effort, this is actually relatively plausible.
Edit: In fact I wouldn't be surprised in Chadondorf was a part of it too. The Leaker/Leakers could just be very smart.
Nope. Still 10 things going for grinch leak and 1 thing going against it.Morning folks, anything new?
Someone please post the August direct mural so we can stop this “background changed” discussion. Theres an easy way to prove/disprove it, but y’all keep posting a bad version of an image we have a good quality version of.
Not only did he do a detailed analysis, he even provided the .psd files so that anyone can download it and check for themselves in Photoshop all those inconsistencies. He made very OBJECTIVE points, he's a digital artist and has a lot of knowledge, and he's definitely correct on his two major points:Omni is a genius!
He saw alot of pixelated errors and said its inconsistency!
What a master
He and Smashified are still kind of idiots for making an outcry over the Banjo render.Not only did he do a detailed analysis, he even provided the .psd files so that anyone can download it and check for themselves in Photoshop all those inconsistencies. He made very OBJECTIVE points, he's a digital artist and has a lot of knowledge, and he's definitely correct on his two major points:
1. There's not a reason for them to make those tiny changes in the background, they serve no purpose at all. Not to mention the fact that the changes only happened on parts of the background that were covered and had no reference, meaning the fake leak artist had to "guess" them.
2. Video compression or motion blur does not distort images that way. Video compression wouldn't make that huge part of the waterfall disappear. It is a fact.
I really wish this leak is real. Banjo & Kazooie have been my most wanted newcomers since Brawl. But my common sense wins over my passion this time, and as much as I'd like it to be true, I just can't believe this is a legit leak.
Alright, found it.Someone please post the August direct mural so we can stop this “background changed” discussion. Theres an easy way to prove/disprove it, but y’all keep posting a bad version of an image we have a good quality version of.
Have we had confirmation that they have ties with Universal?If this is fake, then whoever faked the leak likely won't ever come out because if the person in the company is the one who made this he's going to be in a lot of trouble for jeopardizing the integrity of his own job. On the other hand if the person who faked this isn't the person people traced this back to, they've committed identity theft - which is much worse.
As an aside it's extremely convenient how much of a breadcrumb trail is left in these images that just so happen to lead back to a company that has had ties with Universal and Bandai Namco - yet not Nintendo.
God, this is some big brain thinking and it also sounds extremely likely. vaanrose - I'm curious to hear your opinion.You know...this brings up an interesting thought: we've sort of been assuming the mural has been having characters added to it this whole time, and that they're doing that over a completed blank background, which would make a ton of sense if you had planned to add each character from the beginning. Of course you'd do that, as layers and so forth would help a ridiculous amount.
But...what if it's actually reversed? What if the entire mural was completed first, and characters were taken out of it so they could be kept secret?
Think about it: these aren't renders, they're drawn art. And many of them, quite a FEW of them, interact with each other. A notable example is Chrom, a character not revealed until later, is looking down at Robin, who was already there. This implies that the entire mural was planned and drawn all at once, to be a cohesive whole. That would be the easiest way to make sure the style and forms meshed together correctly, and also that the background would be the right size for everyone to fit correctly when it was done. I daresay it's the only way you could do that, but I won't say that's definite.
Either way, this could explain why the background is inconsistent--they drew the mural directly onto it, and after cutting characters out, they had to edit it to fill the spaces.
This is a bit reachy, I know. And I'm also aware that many pieces of art are also used for the cover art, which would suggest they were drawn separately. But it's possible those were cut out specifically for the boxart. I just find it odd to consider the mural characters were drawn completely separate, especially when you've got things like Wario and Dedede reacting to PT, and Dr. Mario checking G&W's vitals.
Usually I stay away from background discussion...but I thought I'd throw this in to see what you all think. It's got holes, and I'm sure it'll be blasted apart. But I haven't seen anyone suggest this yet, so why not, for the sake of discussion?
I can see the rest of the arc, actually. Incineroar and Ken are all we have on Christmas morning, whereupon we are all still happy (this is a work of fiction) and joyously celebrate by playing and enjoying the game as it is with no complaints (extreme fiction). It inspires the Grinch's small heart to grow three sizes that day, and then delivers back home all the characters he stole as first wave DLC.All this crying and misery is exactly what the Grinch would want. Wether the leak is real or not, he already stole christmas in our hearts.
While the context around the leak is important, it doesn't add super strong proof. Yes, the person mentioned in the leak is real. Yes he does work at print company. But that doesn't mean the leak can't be fake.My guy look at all of my other posts. The background is one simple detraction that can't be explained while there are like 15 other reasons for why this being fake is almost unlikely.
The background is the one thing fake-goers use to prove their point, while the evidence for it being real has like 10+ things, that if fake, all need to miraculously work together to have been convincing this far.
Here:Someone please post the August direct mural so we can stop this “background changed” discussion. Theres an easy way to prove/disprove it, but y’all keep posting a bad version of an image we have a good quality version of.
Yeah people don't understand a pixelated image can remove things that's are pretty clear even in pixelated image lol.My god im tired of this.
People realy dont understand what PIXELATED IMAGE means.
IM DONE
Indeed. I really think a lot of people are brushing off the complexity and elaborate nature of this leak, that really is unprecedented. That isn't to say it makes it real--as I've said, there's holes on both sides, and some people are crazy. But whenever I try to think if something of this magnitude is real, I look at it from the perspective of Team Real and Team Fake, and try to think of the simplest scenario that fits. And really, the simplest scenario is this is an accidental leak, and the nitpicks really do turn out to be just nitpicks (doesn't explain everything, but certain behind the scene stuff we will never know).The idea of this being a group illuminati effort sounds even improbable than it being one person. Yes, it's possible for this to be fake. A lot of things are possible. But is it probable? Is it probable someone is going to go through all this effort just to make a fake smash leak? Even the other Smash leak I listed as an example, the rayman one, the creator got a lot of fame and started a youtube channel and following thanks to it. He got a ton out of all the work he put into his fake leak. This leak would require a LOT of work and wouldn't give the person anything in return, maybe even put them at risk due to impliciting a company and an individual. So is it probable someone would make this fake leak and for so many things to line up with it?
Let's not bring this into it.uh...ok with pixels then
Thankfully he already responded to that post. Here, I'll quote him for you.God, this is some big brain thinking and it also sounds extremely likely. vaanrose - I'm curious to hear your opinion.
I've always been under the assumption it was designed as a full banner and then characters were removed.
However, there's almost no chance they painted the mural finished without layers. You use layers even if you aren't planning on releasing a different version. The non-destructive workflow is the biggest thing digital artwork has over traditional artwork.
Precisely this. All the things going for the leak - however ridiculous - can be fabricated. But the background differences are real: we've been over them, we know they exist. I see that as being a hundred times more damning.While the context around the leak is important, it doesn't add super strong proof. Yes, the person mentioned in the leak is real. Yes he does work at print company. But that doesn't mean the leak can't be fake.
The mostly likely scenario at this point is somebody who does indeed work at that print shop, made this fake using the resources there and then sent it out.
The print shop has no known connections to Nintendo or Bandai Namco or the Grinch movie. The person named in the leak has made a statement saying he has no idea what this is about. Industry 'Insiders' seem to have knowledge that counters the leak in some way.
But honestly all that doesn't matter. If there was a badly photoshopped shrek in the character list and everything else was the same it would still be fake. Because the images in question are fake. That's that. One solid piece of evidence that counteracts the leak kills it. And we have several solid discrepancies between the leak background and the e3 background. That's enough to show it's fake.
Forgot about that movie...and also never saw the movie other than the Duck Hunt clip...better Pac-Man than the one from Ghostly AdventureLet's not bring this into it.
no no no clearly there all just Smashified render of BanjoWhat if the entire banner in this leak is just a photoshopped Little Mac
That's a neat idea.I want her/him to keep an 80s feel. I'll be heaps happy with however their personality turns out to be, though!
Still inconclusive. Personally I call fake.morning everybody...
So its fake or not?
Apologies, I went through the new pages in a hurry and didn't see it, sorry for spamming.Thankfully he already responded to that post. Here, I'll quote him for you.
Who's to say it's for fun? The Grinch stuff could easily be legit and the guy's actual job; he clearly has artistic talent, so this could easily still be his job. He could've drawn up the Smash stuff in his spare time and then used the printing equipment for it when things were slow (people borrow the photocopier and stuff at offices for personal use; doesn't sound out there).It also begs the question of who the **** makes commercial grade Grinch promotions for fun if we go along with the line of thinking that argues this is a giant hoax. That's technically a legal liability too if the person wasn't cleared by Universal to make them, given how they could be false advertising or used for bootleg products so, dear reader, that means for this to be totally fake that the person willingly showed off their work station where they make copyrighted counterfeits and... Do you see how convoluted this is getting? Again, the leaker is either a moron of legendary proportions or a chaotic evil nihilist if completely fake.
He didn't say anything about it, the Smashified twitter account didn't say anything about it; it was one guy who had done a render for Smashified who ended up deleting his tweet.He and Smashified are still kind of idiots for making an outcry over the Banjo render.
Or it means he didn't bother to ask because he knew it wasn't possible.Post edited for total accuracy, but don't try to hit me with that 'do research' crap. Him bringing up Banjo-Kazooie of all characters, and specifically saying it was for adult reasons they couldn't be included, directly implies some consideration was put towards it and an attempt was made that ended with 'no.' I know what he said, but it's clear what it implies.
Weren't the Grinch renders found, like, a full day ago?It also begs the question of who the **** makes commercial grade Grinch promotions for fun if we go along with the line of thinking that argues this is a giant hoax. That's technically a legal liability too if the person wasn't cleared by Universal to make them, given how they could be false advertising or used for bootleg products so, dear reader, that means for this to be totally fake that the person willingly showed off their work station where they make copyrighted counterfeits and... Do you see how convoluted this is getting? Again, the leaker is either a moron of legendary proportions or a chaotic evil nihilist if completely fake.
I've listed before why those changes might be in. Again, art touch ups made in the past months, the blank background used in promos not intended to be the one used for the character art, and that's assuming it's actually not there and not absent due to camera oddities.Is it probable that in the empty battlefield, the one that should have been done from scratch all the big mistakes "The island who is even in the game battlefield, the left side of the battlefield, every crystal that was visible in a banner was there but Nintendo changed everything else. How probable is that Nintendo do BIG art changes at EXACTLY only the places that you couldn't see in the characters image.
I can forgive this, if you only use YouTube as a source for Smash news you'd be in the dark about most of this debate.