Howdy folks. Decided to unlurk myself after lurking religiously since the Ken leak. Anyways, calling back to an earlier discussion, here's something I think is interesting:
If the Grinch leak was fake, why use the Grinch as "evidence" this guy works at Marina or ACP? One of the "faults" in the leak back when it was assumed this guy worked at Marina was that Marina has no direct connection to the Grinch (actually went and checked this, and yeah, there's nothing:
http://www.ateliers-marina.fr/references.html) This no longer really applies as a fault since he doesn't work at Marina anymore, but it does beg the question as to why a fake leaker would decide the Grinch of all things would be what he'd use to add credence to the leak, if we're assuming they chose Bicard in the first place as a scapegoat because he worked at Marina and they have a Bamco connection (There is the fact that Illumination does work out of France, but then why choose Marina instead of some other company). Hell, Marina does work with Sony, so the upcoming Spiderman movie would have made more sense while still being incredulous. Of course, APC doesn't have any Grinch or Smash connections that we can see (they're a lot more secretive than Marina about their contracts though), so the entire point might well be moot, but I think it's worthwhile to consider the logic behind someone adding the Grinch to bolster a fake.
I should note that despite this, I'm leaning #TeamFake right now. Partly to keep my expectations low, partly because of the background stuff and all the insiders coming out against it. If it were one or two, then yeah, insiders have frequently been wrong, but it's pretty rare that all of them collectively get something like this wrong. So a guess is that there's possibly some sort of what I shall dub the Chadondorf Conglomerate (the arch-nemeses of the Vergeben Collective, of course) that made this leak (if it's fake) and one of them just had access to Grinch promo materials and thought they'd be useful to throw in.