amazonevan19
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2018
- Messages
- 917
Ok, fair, my understanding is it's (who appear to be) random people hearing second hand from peeps high up in the leakosphere with "credible evidence it's fake."What are these credible sources, question?
I can't take that for 100% proof, and the absence of the proof bothers me a bit. Why not just offer it and keep the person who furnished it anonymous or something?
But if they have no reason to disbelieve it and those leakers (and IntelliHealth) aren't ****ing around then yeah it's probably time to move on.
I mean, we've all started dismissing the Ken leak just because a leaker said the Ken leak is NOT real, so why shouldn't we dismiss the Geno render based on the word of leakers too?