- Joined
- Jan 30, 2008
- Messages
- 11,489
- Location
- The 90's
- NNID
- staindgrey
- 3DS FC
- 0130-1865-3216
- Switch FC
- SW 1248 1677 4696
There's something to be said, though, about familiarity. Hypothetically, say that on a scale of 1-10, Bowser is a 6, and he's playing against Falco (8), Diddy (9) and Bayonetta (10). While those three characters have clear advantages over Bowser, the players themselves have no experience playing against Bowser, while the Bowser player has all the experience in the world against their characters. It gives him an advantage.Yeah, wasn't Bowser considered garbage in Smash 4 until Nairo showed up to a tournament with him and just mopped the floor with everybody, because he was the only one who decided to really dig into the character and find out what he's capable of, and no one knew how to counter it?
I have a feeling that R.O.B. might be a more competitive character if some of the better players put time into learning him, but he is a weird character both in gameplay and origin, so he doesn't appeal to many people the same way other top-tier characters do.
Characters inherently have strengths and weaknesses, and naturally some characters (Bayo) will have more general strengths than others (Little Mac). This is what leads to tier lists. The problem is that there are so many people that take tier lists as law and limit their character choices to ones that are higher, thus leaving the low tier characters to their fates of being "low tier".
It's good to remember that when Brawl released, Metaknight was commonly considered to be mid- to mid-high tier. Oh, how blissfully ignorant we all were.