Smashoperatingbuddy123
Smash Legend
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2013
- Messages
- 10,909
if thats the case
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
if thats the case
It means nothing. The update didn’t have slots for Lucas, Roy, Ryu, Cloud, and Bayo specifically. The update just had placeholder character slots open.
But from the evidence the Ballot wasn't used for Smash 4 DLC at all, as it appeared Bayo and Cloud were decided before the Ballot, as their data was in the game in 1.0.6, just two weeks after the Ballot launched.I'd say the ballot was used more for Ultimate newcomers than DLC, but some scraps were likely taken from it to decide DLC for 4.
This is partially my bias, and definitely my limited understanding of the situation at large, but I never fully bought that Bayonetta or even Cloud “won” the ballot, even when considering “realizable” characters. I could see Bayo as maybe a top 15 contender, but.. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen any unofficial polling data that placed Cloud anywhere near the top 10 most requested characters.. though I’m very aware of the inaccuracies of relying on unofficial polls.
Ruben also said their slots were copied from characters with similar parameters and for Bayo it was ZSS, and that was only two weeks after the ballot was announced.It means nothing.
If my precious Pirate Ship stage was cut they better darn well give me Gangplank Galleon in return, lol.Is it just me or does every "leaker" think that Gang-Plank Galleon is the most likely new stage? I'll laugh if it's not in the game. I will ... be quite happy if it is, because that could only mean one thing.
Ruben also said their slots were copied from characters with similar parameters and for Bayo it was ZSS, and that was only two weeks after the ballot was announced.
EDIT: Nevermind I may be a fool
Okay... I can do this:Here's a new game (since you guys keep posting games)
Pick new clone or echo characters for the following characters:
Wario
Mr Game and Watch
King Dedede
It could be that the Ballot may have been intended for DLC initially, but partway through decided it would be wasteful to spend those resources on DLC for Smash 4 when they could be pooled for a huge Smash game on the Switch that Nintendo really needed the Switch to be successful (otherwise it would have been a really long time before the Switch got its own Smash game unless it was a straight port), and thus then made up the cover story of Bayo being the "ballot winner" to save face.
Seriously though, this is huge.
In hindsight it makes sense though, as similar polls have been conducted in the past for previous Smash Bros. games.
nah. K Rool wasn't the most voted for.So....
i was right along
king k rool may have really ben the most voted for
so he did lied
Not only would the data for 1.0.6 have been done well before the date it dropped (chances are that the data was how it was before the Ballot launched), but the process of deciding Bayo/Cloud, completing the licensing to them, and starting active development on them would be extremely doubtful to have happened within two weeks.This whole two week time-frame for the ballot to having character data existing doesn't necessarily mean much. Take a look at how the poll worked-- it was announced to a wide-spread audience during a direct. How many people immediately went and voted right after the direct ended? Or, at the very worst, within a couple of days, through hearsay? There would have been a massive influx of votes to at the beginning, and it would have petered out pretty quickly. Most casual fans would vote once, maybe a second time on their friends' computer, but that's about it. For the most part, I expect that results of the poll were determined, with very little fluctuations, within a week of it's inception.
And they probably knew that. It would have been easy to see the trends of the results flesh out, and maintain a relatively similar balance throughout. Generally speaking, polls (and especially those whose results aren't shown up-front) don't change much throughout. What you see in the first few days is a pretty good indicator of the final result. It would have been easy to see which of the top 20 characters were realizable, and to be perfectly frank, a desirable newcomer to Sakurai, and start implementing them early. Does that mean the poll results were fudged a bit? Probably, but I don't think the poll ever stated "the most popular character will get put in no matter what!" It was just being used to gauge interest on which characters people would want.
Or perhaps, more aaccurately, which characters people would actually buy.
Sad part is? ...This probably is right.nah. K Rool wasn't the most voted for.
It was Goku
Can't say I am surprised. I knew some of those things right away. I just hope the real ballot choices will be in Smash Ultimate in the end.
Then why make it last for several months?This whole two week time-frame for the ballot to having character data existing doesn't necessarily mean much. Take a look at how the poll worked-- it was announced to a wide-spread audience during a direct. How many people immediately went and voted right after the direct ended? Or, at the very worst, within a couple of days, through hearsay? There would have been a massive influx of votes to at the beginning, and it would have petered out pretty quickly. Most casual fans would vote once, maybe a second time on their friends' computer, but that's about it. For the most part, I expect that results of the poll were determined, with very little fluctuations, within a week of it's inception.
And they probably knew that. It would have been easy to see the trends of the results flesh out, and maintain a relatively similar balance throughout. Generally speaking, polls (and especially those whose results aren't shown up-front) don't change much throughout. What you see in the first few days is a pretty good indicator of the final result. It would have been easy to see which of the top 20 characters were realizable, and to be perfectly frank, a desirable newcomer to Sakurai, and start implementing them early. Does that mean the poll results were fudged a bit? Probably, but I don't think the poll ever stated "the most popular character will get put in no matter what!" It was just being used to gauge interest on which characters people would want.
Or perhaps, more aaccurately, which characters people would actually buy.
T h e i l l u s i o n o f c h o i c eThen why make it last for several months?
Man, I thought I was clever for voting once on my home computer and once on my work computer.> Remembers voting for Chrom on close to one hundred school computers one boring weekend at college.
Maybe it meant something after all.
It likely didn't.
lol yea thats probably truenah. K Rool wasn't the most voted for.
It was Goku
Wait, seriously? Bayonetta started as a ZSS clone?Maxillian dood called out Bayo before DLC was even a thing and I believed him and looked what happened.
I knew the ballot was a ruse, these talks were done way before launch.
magically gets heels out of nowhere as if her model was being used for someone else.
But why not both?!You all really need to appreciate how amazing the art is in Ultimate.
I mean this looks 4K, and the Switch does not even support 4K.
We all should thank Sakurai and his team for his work for this game instead of ranting.
Going off of this there was no reason to have the ballot open for what? 5, 6 months? Going off of who got the most votes FASTEST kind of undermines the entire point of having a poll to begin with, that's more like a race.This whole two week time-frame from the ballot to having character data existing doesn't necessarily mean much. Take a look at how the poll worked-- it was announced to a wide-spread audience during a direct. How many people immediately went and voted right after the direct ended? Or, at the very worst, within a couple of days, through hearsay? There would have been a massive influx of votes to at the beginning, and it would have petered out pretty quickly. Most casual fans would vote once, maybe a second time on their friends' computer, but that's about it. For the most part, I expect that results of the poll were determined, with very little fluctuations, within a week of it's inception.
Didn't they make a point to say they threw out obvious duplicate votes? That's why I only voted once from my laptop and once from my phone, then just tried to get other people to vote for Ice Climbers and Shantae through Twitter.> Remembers voting for Chrom on close to one hundred school computers one boring weekend at college.
Not exactly... Bayonetta was made using the ZSS's model as a base; using both the same skeleton.Wait, seriously? Bayonetta started as a ZSS clone?
Not necessarily. They're just built off the same skeleton, so to speak. Like how Cloud used a lot of Ike assets.Wait, seriously? Bayonetta started as a ZSS clone?
I'd argue Robin & Chrom. Chrom was literally passed over because he didn't bring anything to the table.There has never been a case where an inaugural character, no matter how “boring” they may be considered, was passed over for a secondary character.
If ARMS gets a character in Smash, it will be Spring Man first. It’s the same thing as XC2. If XC2 gets a character in Smash, it would absolutely be Rex and Pyra.
Fiora is one of the most popular Xenoblade characters. We still got Shulk as the first Xenoblade character.
It really isn’t complicated. I totally get why certain characters might be wanted over Spring Man or *insert character here*. But chances are the main, “title character” is going to be the first character from their respective franchise to be added.
Of course, i’m sure somebody will respond that “Sakurai changes the way he does things all the time!”, which isn’t wrong by any means. But make no mistake, just because he changes certain things doesn’t mean he’ll change others.
...Wait. they did? Do they actually use the same assets or are they just similar?Not necessarily. They're just built off the same skeleton, so to speak. Like how Cloud used a lot of Ike assets.
The beauty of having access to multiple computer labs with different IP addresses, as well as wording each one differently...and a VPN or two. :^)Didn't they make a point to say they threw out obvious duplicate votes? That's why I only voted once from my laptop and once from my phone, then just tried to get other people to vote for Ice Climbers and Shantae through Twitter.
I probably should have worded my statement better. But it's pretty interestingNot necessarily. They're just built off the same skeleton, so to speak. Like how Cloud used a lot of Ike assets.
As said:Ok why has this come up now? I'm sorry but I don't follow why this is coming up now and is valid and believeable... Wouldn't this have come up earlier?
The Mario slots having stats wasn't known at the time and was discovered after the fact, a lot of the datamine stuff was a process to figure out (like stats weren't known how to find for a long time, for example Dedede's air speed nerf was discovered after the fact, and landing lag wasn't known how to be found in the data for nearly the entirety of Smash 4's active patching period, meaning landing lag changes had to be found by manually recording everyone and counting the frames of their landing lag)
Unless I misunderstand, it sounds like the data in 1.0.6 was just a carbon copy of Ike and ZSS, correct? If not then I understand where you're coming from, but if it's just copied numbers to get development started, then why not? If Square came back and said no about Cloud, well they had just picked Ike's model data. He's a relatively generic male frame, and ZSS fits that for female frames too. Not that I have a particularly in-depth understanding of the character creation process, but I feel like they could have started a multitude of characters from that point.Not only would the data for 1.0.6 have been done well before the date it dropped (chances are that the data was how it was before the Ballot launched), but the process of deciding Bayo/Cloud, completing the licensing to them, and starting active development on them would be extremely doubtful to have happened within two weeks.
More entries solidifies your data. Just because the initial burst has a trend, doesn't mean more time doesn't widen (or close) the margin, which helps down the road as more DLC characters were being added. The top end would be pretty obvious right away, but not necessarily the middle ground, and the extra time could help differentiate closer ties in the middle.Then why make it last for several months?
"Cloud used a lot of Ike assets."Not necessarily. They're just built off the same skeleton, so to speak. Like how Cloud used a lot of Ike assets.
Nope. Never wanted her to begin with, haha.So folks...
Here's a question.
Does this question change how you feel about Bayonetta in Smash?