Diddy Kong
Smash Obsessed
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
- Messages
- 26,413
- Switch FC
- SW-1597-979602774
Kroko Bongo is the only thing we need as a indie character. Trust me completely with this one. I have great taste.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I mean, as a fan of the series, there are a LOT of things "missing" if you're going for a complete representation. The issue is Smash has a limited amount of roster space so a complete representation isn't feasible. To list some things "missing," there aren't:Are there any more aspects of Fire Emblem that deserve to be represented through a character? All I can think about is the first global Fire Emblem game with Lyn.
A global release is hardly something that needs to be "represented", and there are more important elements to the series in gameplay elements.Are there any more aspects of Fire Emblem that deserve to be represented through a character? All I can think about is the first global Fire Emblem game with Lyn.
I mean, as a fan of the series, there are a LOT of things "missing" if you're going for a complete representation. The issue is Smash has a limited amount of roster space so a complete representation isn't feasible. To list some things "missing," there aren't:
- Any characters from Valentia, Jugdral, or Magvel
- Any items from the series
- Any villains
- Any Lance users
- Any Axe users
- Any cavaliers, pegasus knights, archers, wyvern riders, myrmidons, clerics, or armored knights, all of which are pretty integral Fire Emblem classes
The thing is, realistically, having all of this at once would require a character roster of AT LEAST ten or eleven for Fire Emblem alone. Further, Smash pretty much only goes for the main lords of the games, so some of these are even less feasible.
Smash actually does a good job of representing lore and game mechanics with three of the four non-clone characters though. Marth's gimmick is spacing, and unit spacing is an integral part of Fire Emblem's gameplay. Robin's is weapon durability, which all but three games in the series have, as well as finally bringing magic from the series into Smash through him. Corrin's transformation moveset harkens back to manaketes and other transforming classes, dragons or otherwise, from throughout the series, and if you want to stretch it, the sort of stage control gimmick she has may reference Dragon Veins in a roundabout way.
Ike doesn't exactly have something like that to work as a reference, off the top of my head, but he's popular and important and doesn't really need one. But honestly I think just having Lyn as an Assist Trophy is fine enough representation for FE7 for now.
Fire Emblem is like Pokémon in the sense that having it be "perfectly represented" in Smash just isn't feasible due to the nature of the series itself.
If only one Fire Emblem rep of these could get in along with the latest main lord, who would it be? What's the next most important thing to be repped for Fire Emblem?A global release is hardly something that needs to be "represented", and there are more important elements to the series in gameplay elements.
We still lack a Lance, Axe or Bow users, not that it's likely we'll ever see one of those considering how Lords are almost always primary sword users and the two who aren't are Ephraim and Hector. Not that I think we NEED one of them, but if we are to get a new FE character, I feel like it should at least not be a foot Sword Lord.
Personally, I'd like to see a mounted unit to see how they'd implement that on Smash(Sigurd or Eliwood would be my personal picks.Jk it's Bow Lyn from FEH) or an Armored one because we have Hector and Black Knight and I'm totally not biased to have one of my favorites as a Slower-And-Stronger-Than-Ganondorf character
I'm still waiting for those Tellius remasters so please can we get the Burger King?
That's just the thing...there really isn't a clear answer for that. There's a lot of different ways they can go. I'd argue something like a full weapon switching Moveset would be my ideal, and it's something Chrom could use rather well. This emphasizes the series's iconic weapon triangle by having each weapon be better in different situations. In Chrom's case, he can use both the Falchion and a lance. The issue is Chrom's already been denied, but hey, I figured it'd illustrate the point.If only one Fire Emblem rep of these could get in along with the latest main lord, who would it be? What's the next most important thing to be repped for Fire Emblem?
I wouldn't say there's a "most important thing to represent", we already have Swords, Magic and Dragons, so all the bases have been hit.If only one Fire Emblem rep of these could get in along with the latest main lord, who would it be? What's the next most important thing to be repped for Fire Emblem?
I'd love to see an armored, mounted unit in Fire Emblem. They'd probably be OP af though.I wouldn't say there's a "most important thing to represent", we already have Swords, Magic and Dragons, so all the bases have been hit.
If we do get another FE character, I just think it shouldn't be a repeat of what we already have, which is why I think it should either be:
-A Lance or Axe user
-A Mounted unit
-An Armored unit
Or a combination of these
Full Weapon Triangle Duessel when?
Being that Arms was not as popular as Sm4sh (competitively or otherwise), I honestly don't see Spring Man being a choice.That's just the thing...there really isn't a clear answer for that. There's a lot of different ways they can go. I'd argue something like a full weapon switching Moveset would be my ideal, and it's something Chrom could use rather well. This emphasizes the series's iconic weapon triangle by having each weapon be better in different situations. In Chrom's case, he can use both the Falchion and a lance. The issue is Chrom's already been denied, but hey, I figured it'd illustrate the point.
Similarly, Celica could bring in another magic user, a Valentian character, and could have a unique mechanic based off of Gaiden/Shadows of Valentia's system of casting magic from health, making her what Pichu should have been.
Hell, right now I'm working on a Moveset for Caeda to illustrate how I think a Pegasus Knight would work in Smash. Like I said, there are a lot of ways to go about it.
...The issue is, besides "Main Lord from the latest game as long as he or she is unique and feasible," basically no one else has a viable shot, so it's kind of moot.
First of all, I believe you quoted the wrong post.Being that Arms was not as popular as Sm4sh (competitively or otherwise), I honestly don't see Spring Man being a choice.
If games that weren't as popular as Smash couldn't get characters, well, I hope you'd enjoy the roster of just Mario, Pokémon, and Zelda characters.Being that Arms was not as popular as Sm4sh (competitively or otherwise), I honestly don't see Spring Man being a choice.
Haven't been on here in a while so I decided to make a Prediction roster for the hell of it. In Spoilers lies my ideal roster, for anyone interested. If anyone would like to know why I picked who I picked I'll be more than glad to explain it.
Smash 5 Roster Prediction
Good enough choice. There isn't really much else to choose, at least, reliable choices. I wish Alm and / or Celica would stand a chance... They probably don't in the long run. Which sucks.Are there any more aspects of Fire Emblem that deserve to be represented through a character? All I can think about is the first global Fire Emblem game with Lyn.
Donkey Kong Country would also be up there. In which case, I'd be totally down with it. Also, more Zelda characters means Impa. And Impa, AS WE ALL KNOW, means a lot.If games that weren't as popular as Smash couldn't get characters, well, I hope you'd enjoy the roster of just Mario, Pokémon, and Zelda characters.
Historical significance is also a factor.Lyn needs FE7 relevance though, if it gets a remake around Smash 5, then sure, but just being popular inside her series is not going to cut it for Sakurai.
Smash 4 showed us that FE is just like Pokemon in terms of representation, in that relevancy is a key factor, otherwise we could have gotten anyone besides Robin and Corrin.
Also, "take away Ike's/Lucina's Prf weapon and give them an axe/lance" is the new "Sword Ganondorf" isn't it?
Not with Fire Emblem.Historical significance is also a factor.
Bringing in a mounted unit would probably have so many problems. From the intricate hurtboxes to the size of the character with the mount, they'd probably have more problems than Ridley unless they make the mount locked to FS or special moves only.I wouldn't say there's a "most important thing to represent", we already have Swords, Magic and Dragons, so all the bases have been hit.
If we do get another FE character, I just think it shouldn't be a repeat of what we already have, which is why I think it should either be:
-A Lance or Axe user
-A Mounted unit
-An Armored unit
Or a combination of these
Full Weapon Triangle Duessel when?
Are they both meant to be the same roster? Is that the joke or is it just a mix up? also a rare Ashley and Anna choice, I like it. You never see Ashley in many of these even though she's pretty likely as a newcomer. Why Plasm Wraith though?Haven't been on here in a while so I decided to make a Prediction roster for the hell of it. In Spoilers lies my ideal roster, for anyone interested. If anyone would like to know why I picked who I picked I'll be more than glad to explain it.
Smash 5 Roster Prediction
Then Alm would be great. Alm is recent, and his moveset would write itself basicaly. Sword characters are popular anyway.Lyn needs FE7 relevance though, if it gets a remake around Smash 5, then sure, but just being popular inside her series is not going to cut it for Sakurai.
Smash 4 showed us that FE is just like Pokemon in terms of representation, in that relevancy is a key factor, otherwise we could have gotten anyone besides Robin and Corrin.
Also, "take away Ike's/Lucina's Prf weapon and give them an axe/lance" is the new "Sword Ganondorf" isn't it?
Do you mind sharing your reasoning behind wanting that move to be stronger? I'm asking because I really can't see why an character as strong as Diddy Kong should get any buffs given that he's almost universally agreed upon as being Top 3 as of now.Also Diddy's U Air needs a buff
Yeah, it does kind of look like they just abandoned customs during the DLC period. I feel like the way they handled customs this game led to a lot of wasted potential, they could've been implemented a lot better than they were.I think Smash 5 could definitely benefit with Custom Moves becoming a bigger thing.. and just cut equipment entirely.
It definitely feels like they wanted Custom Moves to be a thing then just forgot them entirely with DLC characters and didn't go as far with them as they could.
Not if the barometer is "more successful than Smash". Fire Emblem is more successful than it used to be... but its most successful title has sold what? < 2m? That still puts it behind the most successful titles of Metroid, Star Fox, Animal Crossing, Kirby, Yoshi, Wario, F-Zero and Rhythm Heaven, Splatoon, and a bunch of stuff from their more casual ventures. And of those I believe only Animal Crossing has sold better than the poorest selling Smash. Plus obviously the aforementioned series.Also don't kid yourself, Fire Emblem would be up there too. In a way, it's not weird to have many Fire Emblem characters in Smash. Smash literally brought new life to Fire Emblem and made it go international. That's kinda huge.
Not enough for FE in Smash, unless you're Marth.Historical significance is also a factor.
They were totally meant to be different, I’ll have to fix it when I get on a computer.Bringing in a mounted unit would probably have so many problems. From the intricate hurtboxes to the size of the character with the mount, they'd probably have more problems than Ridley unless they make the mount locked to FS or special moves only.
Are they both meant to be the same roster? Is that the joke or is it just a mix up? also a rare Ashley and Anna choice, I like it. You never see Ashley in many of these even though she's pretty likely as a newcomer. Why Plasm Wraith though?
I think Smash 5 could definitely benefit with Custom Moves becoming a bigger thing.. and just cut equipment entirely.
It definitely feels like they wanted Custom Moves to be a thing then just forgot them entirely with DLC characters and didn't go as far with them as they could.
Isn't Ragnell his signature weapon or something though? You can't take that away from him.For variation sake they could also simply give Ike the Urvan and make him Smash's Axe Lord mascot
That's not a thing.'insert name of story-important Lance from Fire Emblem Awakening'
The thing is, literally every FE character in Smash uses Swords (Robin is more of a Magic user but he still uses swords), which is a poor representation of the series (i.e. many people who don't play the games see every character as a "generic animu swordsman"). Even our only FE Assist Trophy uses a Sword. And even if Lyn would be unique (I never said she wouldn't be), people are going to call her a Marth clone (they did it with Ike appearently).Weapon differences in the Fire Emblem cast are overrated. I think Lyn would be more unique than you give credit for, simply because she fights more like a samurai than most other Lords. Not because she uses a sword doesn't mean she's not unique. Hector would be interesting sure. Axe armor Lord, that's unique in its own. But I wouldn't dismiss Lyn just yet.
The problem isn't that there isn't anyone of another weapon type than sword, the problem is that half the FE cast in Smash plays similarly (Marth and Lucina being clones of each other and Roy still being a clone despite being slightly Luigified since melee). Lyn would solve that by being a really quick swordswoman with flash step-like moves (and maybe a bow too?).The thing is, literally every FE character in Smash uses Swords (Robin is more of a Magic user but he still uses swords), which is a poor representation of the series (i.e. many people who don't play the games see every character as a "generic animu swordsman"). Even our only FE Assist Trophy uses a Sword. And even if Lyn would be unique (I never said she wouldn't be), people are going to call her a Marth clone (they did it with Ike appearently).
Yes but some people are dumb and think Ike is also a clone of Marth. And unless Lyn's fighting style is really flashy, people will make the same mistake.The problem isn't that there isn't anyone of another weapon type than sword, the problem is that half the FE cast in Smash plays similarly (Marth and Lucina being clones of each other and Roy still being a clone despite being slightly Luigified since melee). Lyn would solve that by being a really quick swordswoman with flash step-like moves (and maybe a bow too?).
And asking for other weapon types just for the sake of having them instead of being because the character is interesting and relevant is like asking for a Grass starter just for the sake of completing the starter triangle, especially since type effectiveness doesn't exist in Smash.
Why should we care about people who think Ike and Marth are clones when the only thing they share is that they're Fire Emblem characters?Yes but some people are dumb and think Ike is also a clone of Marth. And unless Lyn's fighting style is really flashy, people will make the same mistake.
Fair point I guess.Why should we care about people who think Ike and Marth are clones when the only thing they share is that they're Fire Emblem characters?
Also, pretty much everything Diddy Kong said above when it comes to Lyn.
Also, the overrepresentation of swords is more IS's fault than Sakurai's; every game has at least one major protagonist using a sword, and it just so happens that it's the kind of character Sakurai always brought or, in Chrom's case, considered to put in Smash.Fair point I guess.
Please ignore me and continue on with your life.
"B-but they have a counter so they must be clones despite having clearly different moves and playstyles!"Why should we care about people who think Ike and Marth are clones when the only thing they share is that they're Fire Emblem characters?
Also, pretty much everything Diddy Kong said above when it comes to Lyn.