@VA
Whilst this does sound really condescending, I do get the impression you don't seem to understand that Prof and Fuzz hype up and exaggerate their own wins because, well, that's what they do, and we derive a reasonable amount of amusement for it; not, as you seem to be taking it, because they don't respect you as a player.
I mean, of course they respect you; you're probably the only person in the UK that they bother going full on 100% on, which just makes them even happy that they beat you and as a consequence even more likely to hype up (and exaggerate) their win against you :S
Basically we <3 you VA, don't leave us
@leffen + co
Also this talk about what a 'good player' is is absolute bull****. It's a term where there's OBVIOUS equivocation in its usage; it's only really worth arguing over when you specify how you're going to use it first.
It's quite plain that whether someone is 'good' or not is going to differ depending on whether you're talking in terms of tech skill, or in terms of international placement, or in terms of national placement, or even simply in terms of hypothetical placement were they to have a stronger mental game (though the last one is obviously a little dodgy, considering the mental game is a very large part of smash).
Speaking in terms of 'when it actually matters' is equally ridiculous. You obviously can't actually mean 'when it actually matters', as 'actually matters' doesn't mean anything; how much something matters is a scale, and how far up the scale something places is dependent on loads of factors, like previous hype, prestige, money, and grudges. It only really makes sense to specify a specific point on the scale in the first place, and then talk about people in that context.
EDIT: To clarify, I'm not denying that you can't use terms like 'when it actually matters' or 'good player' at all, as people obviously do, and understand perfectly. But what I am saying, is that these phrases require some context within which they are used, and they often pick out specific situations based on the context that they're used in.
The way leffen + co were using it seemed to mask this fact, and if you actually realise the function these words serve, then it's plainly obvious that the best way of understanding what leffen + co are actually saying is the trivial statement that "VA's tournament placing (i.e. what they are talking about when things 'actually matter', or makes a 'good player') is reflected by VA's tournament placing (i.e. the evidence they're giving to support this claim)."