Substitution
Deacon Blues
Edit: Never mind.It's currently on the site. I'll screencap it while it lasts, and then we'll have to wait until voice mods are possible for Smash 4.
Still needs to happen though.
Last edited:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Edit: Never mind.It's currently on the site. I'll screencap it while it lasts, and then we'll have to wait until voice mods are possible for Smash 4.
it's kind of... ickily fanservicy at pointsRandom question because I know some of you are fans, I recently finished watching Kill La Kill so to those of you who've actually seen it, what did you think of it as a whole?
Science Rools.It's currently on the site. I'll screencap it while it lasts, and then we'll have to wait until voice mods are possible for Smash 4.
Bill Nye as Palutena VA confirmed.
Inertia is a property of matterScience Rools.
T-7 SecondsScience Rools.
It was maybe 3 people, and all of it happened because of Psycho, a long-time good poster, reliably posted something good related to Ridley with gameplay concepts. And while some people followed up on the interesting subjects he raised (namely air grabs, something I've talked at lengths about before). It also was immediately brushed over and generally forgotten about, like all gameplay discussion.And in fact, lots of people immediately started discussing gameplay.
I've been around since 2007. I've seen what happens, and while there are quality posters, it's not exactly flourishing. It's certainly gotten better from the Club R.I.D.L.E.Y. days, but honestly, it couldn't be worse than that. Regardless, that thread is still mostly bad, and it isn't where it should be.The thread/posters are only as bad as you make them out to be.
First off, I'm not "talking smack", I'm talking legitimate criticism of the thread and the culture of the thread. I think people who want to actually discuss Ridley as a potential newcomer in smash deserve better. I also in general want to see the community thrive, and I feel gameplay talk is a sign of that.Rather than talk smack about it here or in private, you should man up and share your thoughts on said thread.
T-7 Seconds
Hey, it's the perfect argument against the Mario Theory!! Mewtwo and Jigglypuff confirmed!because apparently no one plays the games, but instead just stares at the character select screen.
I guess it's still Falco friday after all.At least I know what I'm going to cook for dinner
I guess it's still Falco friday after all.
---
But who my good man? Who?You guys need to worship different Pokemon...
Yeah. Like this one.I almost suggested to Cliffjumper that he shouldn't triple post.
You guys need to worship different Pokemon...
Falco was rumoured to be announced today. Apparently some guy on GameFaqs said so...
Your pretentious posts based on your arbitrary expectations of other individuals conduct never ceases to intrigue me. I am going to be concise; people do not talk about characters in regards to game-play as everything is subjective within reason. The only game-play related discussion pertaining to characters is limited as most people adhere to archetypes and suggesting something that is not within those standards will be met with criticism. It is really simple. I do not believe that you were asking though, you just felt as though it was necessary for you to assert your opinion.It was maybe 3 people, and all of it happened because of Psycho, a long-time good poster, reliably posted something good related to Ridley with gameplay concepts. And while some people followed up on the interesting subjects he raised (namely air grabs, something I've talked at lengths about before). It also was immediately brushed over and generally forgotten about, like all gameplay discussion.
I've been around since 2007. I've seen what happens, and while there are quality posters, it's not exactly flourishing. It's certainly gotten better from the Club R.I.D.L.E.Y. days, but honestly, it couldn't be worse than that. Regardless, that thread is still mostly bad, and it isn't where it should be.
However, you could say that about most the threads, since they're glorified fan clubs rather than character-related gameplay focused hubs because people care more about "muh reps/sales/recuncy/fuvurites" than actual gameplay, because apparently no one plays the games, but instead just stares at the character select screen.
Of course it doesn't help when the staff continues with the tradition of the Ridley thread being an abomination.
If you want a look at what that board should look like, take a look at the K. Rool thread. Now that's a good thread.
First off, I'm not "talking smack", I'm talking legitimate criticism of the thread and the culture of the thread. I think people who want to actually discuss Ridley as a potential newcomer in smash deserve better. I also in general want to see the community thrive, and I feel gameplay talk is a sign of that.
Second off, this isn't private. The only opinions I keep private are off-topic opinions (I don't post my thoughts on movies here, I go to another thread on another board or another site entirely), ones that don't belong here, or ones that I'm still forming (mostly in terms of how to present them) for the public to see.
Third off, I have shared my thoughts in that thread since before you've joined this site, so that criticism isn't even remotely fair. The only times I didn't share my thoughts about what's going on there is when the thread (in its' multiple incarnation dating to before Brawl came out) is when it is locked, or when all Ridley discussion was flat out banned in the pre-Brawl days.
Since we're insisting, I'll post this post in both the Social and Ridley threads. That way I can "man up" more than you and your petty insults and passive-aggressive machismo, and post in a thread for each ball I have. Nah, I'll stop at 2. I don't want to brag about my other balls. That come off as obsessive.
I can have any Pokemon I want as an avatar, and there's nothing you can do about itI almost suggested to Cliffjumper that he shouldn't triple post.
You guys need to worship different Pokemon...
yeah people on gamefaqs are crazyFalco was rumoured to be announced today. Apparently some guy on GameFaqs said so...
Metang and Metagross say hi.As for Diglett, I don't get Pokemon evolutions that create more Pokemon. Are you sure you are not being scammed?
You can never have too much of a good thing.As for Diglett, I don't get Pokemon evolutions that create more Pokemon. Are you sure you are not being scammed?
Meet MagnetonAs for Diglett, I don't get Pokemon evolutions that create more Pokemon. Are you sure you are not being scammed?
I think you missed the point of that post.Fixed.
I am their leader. You got a problem with our fold, you come to me.You guys need to worship different Pokemon...
Of course I did. However, the video count was at an odd number. Three to be specific. So I wanted to even it out.I think you missed the point of that post.
I just wouldn't want to believe in some phony Pokemon. I prefer to be euphoric in my own badges.You can never have too much of a good thing.
Looks like Assassin Creed x Scarecrow from batmanDid you guys hear about the concept art for MKX? Apparently, Ermac got leaked. He's got more of a witch doctor or wizard look to him. Still retains some ninja aspects too. This might be one of my favorite Ermac designs, though I liked his MK9 and Deception designs a lot too. Glad to see he's probably going to come back in MKX.
Well, you'll never know until you try.I just wouldn't want to believe in some phony Pokemon. I prefer to be euphoric in my own badges.
My existence.Anyone gotta joke?