The part about the DLC was apparently confirmed fake, "Motherf-ing Leaker" threw it in because he could, according to another.
I'm just staying out of it for the most part, people can pick it apart just fine without me. From my perspective of watching things as they progress, what I'm generally getting is:
- Various inconsistencies are pointed out, such as Wario's missing eye, for example.
- #TeamFake (eugh, hashtags...) Proposes that Sakurai would never let such things happen. They proceed to show evidence that the CSS is very inconsistent when compared to the demo version.
- #TeamReal Points out that if a leaker were to go through the effort of making a leak this big, they wouldn't let something like that slip. They go on to use #TeamFake's evidence against them, as the demo did contain such inconsistencies.
- Meanwhile I suspect that the group that made the leak, being Brawl modders, render artists, speculators, etc. know just how well the community will pick through the leak with a fine tooth comb. Therefore they purposely add inconsistencies that they know will be found, yet can in turn be used to "validate" the leak by value of everyone trying too hard to disprove it.
Wild conspiracy theories aside, there's one thing in particular that bugs me. Some of these points have been made already, though bear with me, I'd just like to reiterate them in order to lead up to my own point:
- The ESRB does not play the games they rate. Proven by the ESRB website, however, it's clear that in all probability, the images taken are not of a 3DS, but of a video being played off of a screen. Though this conflicts with point two:
- The player slot, when visible, in each leak is labeled as "ESRB0083." My initial thought is that the leakers put the name in the faked images to throw off the trail, particularly evident in "B0083." Perhaps they mistakenly thought that the ESRB play the games, though I can't say much else on the matter.
- A point towards the leak's credibility: It is possible that the "ESRB0083" was put in the video by Nintendo, perhaps so that if the images did leak, Nintendo would know exactly where it came from.
- However, my initial concern comes up. When compiling a video to send to the ESRB, there would typically only be cases of the most extreme content possible within the game. there is absolutely no need for every inch to be inspected. Particularly, what exactly would the ESRB be rating in said images? "This roster is far too obscene, M rating!" A lot of things just don't fit right, and there's yet to be any completely solid explanations for this.
For now, we wait to see how things progress. Everyone is free to pick apart my own observations if they so desire.