Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Who is responsible for this nonesene? KevMo isn't a play and doesn't need pressure any time soon. Dumb move, if not scummy.KevinM begins the day with an anonymous extra vote, which will expire at the end of the day phase.
Quoting stuff.Leave him at L-2, off hydra will quote later, but don't vote anymore.
Want AG to say something first.
Makes me need to take a step back.@ lak
do you REALLY think aggressive mediation is still a good guy? he made a garbageass case and disappeared. that is literally all he has done in this game along with posting amusing gifs. do you REALLY think soup would take this approach as scum? if hes a scum roleblocker what in the **** is he accomplishing by entering d2 like this? does this change your opinion of his slot at all?
No shiz O.omarshy said:im having trouble rationalizing why soup would do this as a scum roleblocker plus i havent been bothered by his play. if hes scum hes just going to...out his role to get an inactive lynched? wtf? what do other people think of this? strikes me as likelier to be town
You talking about Ruy amirite? Like, for example, his very first instance in this game was asking a buncha questions that, iirc, he went NO ****ING WHERE with. I saw that last Night and I was like... Da fuqq? And then yesterDay his hard headed tunneling of Soup, plus that "I don't give a fuhh what you have to say" attitude in general when he was attacking people like Gheb was just so grimy. He had no regard to what anybody said and if he's not scum, he's very very very very very very very very very very very antitown with that type of play.marshy said:i dunno gorf. back in math blasters you made cases and were generally proactive. here you just come off as really lazy in comparison and i dont get it. nowhere near as much "oomph" to ya. can you briefly explain what you mean by lak lacking direction and why that is scummy on his part? not asking for a longass case or anything just something to gimme an idea
He had a ****ty case and had a had a huge lack of activity, he didn't seem interested in advancing his own read more or less sticking to his case, I saw both of the heads posting other places but ignoring this thread completely. Lack of town incentive, doubtful they would purposely sit on their case like that.aka what every protown player should do?
nah i get what you mean just bustin your balls
can you tell me why the **** am is town? like literally. everyone said this d1 but i dont see it. is it the gifs? the disappearance act? is it the terrible case? someone please enlighten me to this crazy bull****
btw soup whyd you hit am anyways?
You can say both, really. I don't get why it was so hard to check this thread once in a while, I was giving you stuff to work with. Have you read anything at all and do you have relevant opinions for us now?Still waiting on Alex.
Lack of town incentive? Lack of incentive in general leads to inactivity or a more pressing priority. Are you pushing because we were roleblocked on a no kill night or because you think we were intentionally sitting on a stale stance?
Marshy, you can **** off. You spent half of MP2 yelling about how a Macman shot was too flimsy and you're pushing a roleblock like it's the gospel. If you want to push based off of play, then there's ammunition and you can try your luck with that. A roleblock is weak sauce, especially on a player who is unlikely to be sending in a scum team night kill.
If there was an Indy there would at least be one kill going through regardless of my RB, because that's what you're implying with the bolded.Man how's that question even scummy simple yes/no that ain't gotta do with jack shiz yo.
JTB actually has a point regarding the AggroMed thing, idk whether we should go totally off of the fact that Soup roleblocked em and if he claims the voteblock as well, that leaves room for a counterclaim, and if there is none it most def adds justification to his play. Plus, with the influx of PR's this game who knows what the fuhh could've happened last night... which is why this type of game is tough to deal with. Scum very well COULD have hit a doc protect, and what about the arbitrary indy that happens to be put in every damn game on this site, I don't expect Raz to be any different. We're being, like, almost barbaric with this lynching off a whim thing. We're being, like, medieval thinking we found a witch because AggroMed's nose looks funny. Has anyone realized that this isn't necessarily the best course of action? I'm down to lynched *****es, but I'd rather lynch scummy *****es than go off of NA's, and tbh AggroMed ain't scummy.
Indy doesn't have to have a kill. Indy could've targeted the same person as mafia or a completely different protected slot. Indy probably does exist and your role block didn't hit a killing role of any kind.If there was an Indy there would at least be one kill going through regardless of my RB, because that's what you're implying with the bolded.
why do you think this?especially on a player who is unlikely to be sending in a scum team night kill.
This just in. My grandparent's house, where I'm going for the summer in order to work a summer job, has no internet until I can get the modem swapped. Unless I can find somewhere with free Wi-Fi, you'll probably only have Laundry and what I can give over the phone. I'm going to try and read before I leave.He's not going to be back until after I've left, so I'm going to start after I eat and he'll see what I've said and finish if I haven't. I'll get him to call me and you can have a united stance after he reads what I've said.
Because I'm more valuable to a scum team than the entire player list. If you were going to pick to have the player least likely to be tracked do the killing, that's still not us given our activity yesterday. Take it for what it is, but 10 times out of 10 I don't pull the trigger last night.why do you think this?
Actually because we're strictly going off of NA's to incriminate AM, think of it like this: THERE ARE ZERO VANILLAS IN THIS DAMN GAME, THERE'S GOTTA BE SOMETHING THAT CAN STOP A KILLING INDY. And plus, who the BREASTS said that the indy HAAAAAAAAAAAD to be a killer? You insist on hopping onto AM based off of your NA, yet refuse to dive into the WIFOM that that entails? Hop. The. ****. Off.If there was an Indy there would at least be one kill going through regardless of my RB, because that's what you're implying with the bolded.