conTAgi0n
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2015
- Messages
- 416
- Switch FC
- SW 1668 7817 3192
Let me start by saying I really do appreciate you sharing your opinion with us, I think these discussions are healthy to have. But there is a lot of baseless assumption to unpack in here.Maybe you don’t remember but the franchise essentially jumped ship from being a huge Nintendo franchise in the 5th and 6th generation of consoles aside from handhelds, where there was no realistic competition to the game boy. Claiming Megaman is entirely loyal to Nintendo is just flat out wrong. Besides Nintendo loyalty doesn’t mean anything to third parties anyway. Only popularity matters and importance to gaming history. Out of our current third parties, none can be said to be in due to Nintendo loyalty. Bayo is in due to ballot. Snake Cloud and Ryu due to gaming importance. Sonic due to rivalry. Megaman and PacMan were in there for being gaming icons. Clinging to some idea of Nintendo loyalty is like me saying Travis Touchdown should be likely over other characters due to being primarily on Nintendo systems. The best arguement for Shantae is popularity, which is the only reason that I did not rate her lower. Shantae seems more popular then she is due to how dedicated her fans are.
Loyalty is probably not the right way to frame these types of relationships. It's not as though videogame characters are cheating on Nintendo when they move to a different console. Third party characters are basically always multiplat. Why on earth wouldn't they be?Maybe you don’t remember but the franchise essentially jumped ship from being a huge Nintendo franchise in the 5th and 6th generation of consoles aside from handhelds, where there was no realistic competition to the game boy. Claiming Megaman is entirely loyal to Nintendo is just flat out wrong.
During the NES era, Mega Man was a huge part of Nintendo's history, and vice versa. That probably was a big plus for Mega Man's inclusion. I don't think it's coincidence that they went with a retro style Mega Man reminiscent of his NES days. Of course, Mega Man had a lot going for him anyway.
So little is known about the way Sakurai selects third party characters, I don't know how you can possibly make a statement like that so confidently. Smash has always served as a celebration of Nintendo's past and present, so some sort of relationship or history with Nintendo almost certainly does affect the chances of third party characters. Cloud proves that it's not a strict requirement, but that is a very long way from proving it doesn't matter. Every other third party character ever included does have significant ties with Nintendo.Besides Nintendo loyalty doesn’t mean anything to third parties anyway. Only popularity matters and importance to gaming history.
Again, just because no third party has gotten into Smash based purely off of history with Nintendo does not show that it isn't an important factor in their consideration. A factor need not be sufficient or necessary to be important.Out of our current third parties, none can be said to be in due to Nintendo loyalty. Bayo is in due to ballot. Snake Cloud and Ryu due to gaming importance. Sonic due to rivalry. Megaman and PacMan were in there for being gaming icons.
You also state very authoritatively why each of these characters got into Smash, but I don't think anyone really knows the whole story.
Bayo - is she really in just because she won the ballot? Are we even sure she won the ballot at all? A lot of people, myself included, speculate that work must have started on her well before the ballot concluded, given how far along her development was by the time her trailer aired just two months later. You couldn't even settle the legal arrangements that fast.
Regardless of her success in the Ballot, which we can only take Nintendo's word for, it's unlikely they would have picked her as the winner if they didn't have other reasons for being in favor of her inclusion. Dare I say, one of those reasons may have been her very close relationship with Nintendo. Nintendo really snagged a gem by securing the Bayonetta franchise as Nintendo exclusive. For that reason, it makes a lot of business sense for them to show her off in Smash.
It is well-known that Snake was included more as a personal favor by Sakurai to Kojima, a longtime friend of his.
Sonic due to "rivalry"... By the time Sonic was included, there was no rivalry between Nintendo and Sega. I think what you mean is that Sonic was included due to his history as Mario's main rival. I would say that rivalry is a very real history that Sonic shared with Nintendo, but let's not quibble over that.
Anyways, let's move on.
That sounds reasonable to me though. Travis Touchdown seems much more likely to me for having appeared primarily on Nintendo consoles than if he had appeared primarily on PlayStation or whatever. I don't think his chances are fantastic, but I think he's a lot more likely than, say, Dante from Devil May Cry.Clinging to some idea of Nintendo loyalty is like me saying Travis Touchdown should be likely over other characters due to being primarily on Nintendo systems.
I think there are a lot of important arguments that come together in favor of Shantae besides her popularity, but I want to focus on the latter statement here.The best arguement for Shantae is popularity, which is the only reason that I did not rate her lower. Shantae seems more popular then she is due to how dedicated her fans are.
What is your basis for believing Shantae is more popular than she seems, as opposed to any of the other ballot characters? What makes it so that the online evidence for her popularity, specifically, is misleading in a way that the evidence for other popular characters is not? If Shantae seems popular online, wouldn't the simpler explanation simply be that she genuinely gained a lot of popularity and support through the Smash Ballot?
Last edited: