Hi jazzy. I'm going to properly respond to you this time. I haven't read the next 2 pages so I'm not sure if there's something important after, but I'm a little perplexed by your post, so let's just go for it. This might end up a bit long and some things might go over normal talk, but I want to voice my heart here...
I understand this might be a bit rude (I don't intend to be!) but given that there's a lot here I'm going to highlight the main issues I have here and omit the rest. I hope you understand.~
...because it tells me that you're someone who's emotionally sensitive...
Here's the first thing I take issue with. I'm not emotionally sensitive.
Though I will say it
is somewhat of a self-fulfilling prophecy because what
does aggravate me is when someone reads intent or emotion into my actions or statements when there definitely aren't any. xD
I can accept the criticism that my interpretation could be too narrow. In light of James "reacting" to the Smash reveal, I will say that it's possible that a more "open" interpretation is available. I just believe that I have a reasonable doubt and my doubts so far have yet to be alleviated. Not that they can't be.
Keep in mind here, with all due respect (and I say "with respect" because I'm trying to emphasize that I'm not upset with you and not coming at you from an emotionally shaky place), the internet lacks vital cues that can give you insight into a person's actual demeanor. You can infer "emotional cues" or "intent" from my writing, but... that doesn't necessarily wash. Especially when you're not actually familiar with who I am as a person.
It's very often that I act more eccentric on here because I want to appear approachable and not turn people away with more frank speech patterns. If you prefer I'd speak more candidly, then I'm sorry but that wouldn't be as fun. I like my writing to have personality. As a random aside, I
am a writer.
It's quite possible I'm playing a character. You simply don't know!
The fun part is you're criticizing my interpretation of James' interview while reading your own interpretation into me. xD
In fact, I'm incredibly pleased by balance, and welcome your take with open arms, not just in itself but because it brings an opportunity for me and others to try to balance the great low that you bring to the table.
Gee thanks. xD
Yeah, I get the feeling people in support threads don't necessarily want to hear any detracting viewpoints.~
I'm not afraid to be disappointed, but you and many others are
You're patently wrong. I'm not afraid to be disappointed either.
I understand that's not always easy to do and it just makes sense to you to be realistic in a pessimistic way
I specifically, preemptively addressed that I find your equation of my realism to pessimism to be wrong. So I'll re-iterate, I don't agree that my realism, in this scenario, is pessimistic. I'm a "watch and wait" type of observer. If more compelling evidence comes to the table, I'll gladly accept it.
I'm
99% sure she's represented in the game in some form if it makes you feel any better. But playable status is the holy grail for a character. It's not unreasonable for me to keep my expectations low for that when there is
zero precedence for a Western-made, Western-owned, indie character to be on the roster. There's
zero.
Could it happen? Absolutely! Will it happen? Let's see! Can you interpret her chances differently? Absolutely!
Personally, I think 30% is a generous ranking for
any character. Keep in mind she's competing with literally
thousands of other video game characters.
30% is damn good!
On top of that, I'm not an authority so you don't even need to take my estimation to heart. Hopefully my jovial manner of speaking isn't coming off sarcastically. I really,
really don't mean to offend you. I can't stress this enough.
It's less constricting to speak in a more jovial manner.~
And if I can't, and you're happy enough with how you're approaching things, that's ok with me, and I'll try not to impose my views on you.
I'm perfectly content with the way I approach things. Thank you for understanding.~
I just hope that you also can understand that you're coming from where you are, with how you've come to be, and that others may be in very different places.
Naturally.~
I'm a bonafide individualist.
There were moments in your speech where you expressed confusion with which I interpreted your intent and actions; I've opted against explaining myself or reading further intent into them. Basically, I won't psycho-analyze you if you don't psycho-analyze me. I would much prefer you address my points on their own merits and leave my character out of it. Respectfully.
I consider myself to be an emotional rock. I understand the power of words and the many different interpretations that people can read into them so I won't begrudge you your interpretation of my words. I just vehemently disagree with you.
(If you need to discuss this further, we can take this to PMs.)