You are NOT vanilla town. I know this because I am the napkin tracker. I tracked you, and you targeted me last night. Spak claimed doc and says he saved me. That leaves only 1 targeting role left, and that's you, the fry, targeting me.
IF you had counter-claimed doc, then we would have had to kill you both, in turn. We would have started with you anyways because we all suspected you anyways (see my wall of text above.) If you happened to flip doc, that would mean that spak was the scum. We'd end the day at 5, lose 1 at night, and then it'd be 3 immediate votes Day 3 for Spak, and we'd still win.
But you won't flip doc. You'll flip scum. Because we sniffed you out already.
Vote: Lolazerz
Let me lead off my proposal with this:
All night actions have been sent in, and thus the day will begin now.
No one has died during this night.
Jay ended night-time early. And he stated in huge bold words that ALL night actions have been. That means that scum DID send an order in, and no one forgot to act. I won't neglect to take into account that a no-kill order is usually a legal action.
Town, we have 3 options, as far as I can see this: (AND THEY ALL WIN
)
1. We believe Spak.
We can't be colluding because we already killed 1 scum. So if Spak is doc and saved me, we have to consider whether it's rational
in any way that I would be the scum and no-kill deliberately. This would require me to campaign hard against my scum-mate all Day 1, and then no kill. With only 1 scum left, there's no way that I could have no-killed. I would have expected a free kill against lolazerz today, another night kill N2, and then we'd wake up D3 with just 3 players left and my name still reasonably cleared because of how hard I campaigned against my scum mate D1.
Consider the likelihood of me being scum and no-killing. My only shot in this game would have been
of course to kill someone. I will take this likelihood into account in my proposed plan of action below, although you should consider whether this would be rational in any way.
So if we're believing Spak (in this scenario) that he docced me last night, we should assume that scum tried to kill me and he saved me. This would clear my name. I'm claiming Napkin, and I have not been counterclaimed. I saw lolazerz target me in the night. Since we're believing Spak in this scenario, that means that lolazerz is the only remaining targeting role, which is the other scum, and we vote him out.
I know I'm telling the truth (you might have speculation, which is why I have more scenarios below), and lolazerz failed to counter-claim doc. This is important. I waited on this accusation to see if he would do so, but he didn't. I baited him into claiming vt by making him think I had figured something out assuming he claimed vt.
@
lolazerz
if you are vt then I have this game solved. Speak up as soon as you can and then I'll explain what I figured out.
This scenario fits all of his Day 1 behavior, it fits Spak's claim, it fits lolazerz failure to claim a non-vanilla role, and it fits with all of the rest of your vanilla town claims.
2. We don't believe Spak
This means that Spak is scum, and that lolazerz completely didn't bother to counter claim, nor did any of the rest of you. If Spak is lying, he is either scum, which means lolazerz is doc (remember, he targeted me last night) or spak is lying and is vt, which is stupid. That could mean lolazerz failed to counter-claim, but spak guessed right that I was the target of 2 other people's actions before they spoke up! :S Not likely! Remember again, lolazerz targeted me last night. So if Spak lied, he's scum, because otherwise we have a completely irrational player who is playing against his own win condition who is ALSO randomly guessing a 1 in 6. (Any of 6 of us could have been the attempted murder victim).
This scenario is bonkers. But it's an option. So I won't neglect to mention it. I'm being thorough.
3. We don't believe Dastrn
Ok, here's number 3. I put at 3rd because I KNOW it's not true. YOU don't, but you should be able to logic it out just fine. Either way I'm putting this out there out of integrity because it IS possible and we should have all of the options on the board.
If I'm lying and didn't see lolazerz target me, then I'm scum, and targeted either myself or no one, hence the no-kill result. I already addressed why this is the worst move I could make as scum on N1 after losing my only buddy, after CAMPAIGNING hard against my only buddy day 1. I'd be the worst scum in D-Games history.
Ok, here's what I propose:
I believe Spak.
I firmly believe lolazerz is scum.
I want to see us just vote him and get it done with pretty quick.
If he flips vt, KILL ME d3. (because I'd be lying about seeing him take a night action).
If he flips doc, KILL Spak d3. (because that's the only way spak would have known that I was lolazerz' doc target and he seems smart enough to try to claim first on an already suspicious player.)
Those are the only reasonable options. I don't see how this doesn't pan out. If any of you others were the doc letting spak get away with a doc claim, that wouldn't matter, because that means that we'd still be hitting a night-action-taker today when we kill lolazerz, and all that's left is scum.
Poke holes in my logic if you see any. I don't want to screw this up. But I
think it's airtight and we can win by just killing lolazerz toDay and if he flips non-scum, then we kill me or spak Day 3 depending on how he flips.
