- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 9,609
- 3DS FC
- 3136-6583-3704
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't really have a reasoning. I am making an assumption based on empirical data. I don't even want Snake to go, I want him to be replaced with Big Boss. Secondly, I highly doubt Konami cares if Snake makes it into Brawl. It isn't like they are marketing Phantom Pain like a Jigglypuff in a Jigglypuff shop. I don't really think Snake can be replaced. Simply removed.Few people predicted the Villager over the Miis, and most of us saw them as "in a competition" assuming either of them made it at all.
Hindsight... it was kind of a stupid debate. But hey! At least it made sense, unlike the stupid Fire Emblem discussions.
Well if you cut Snake, it would take about 3 times as much time, money, effort, and (way more than that) brainstorming to "replace him" with an equal newcomer with new moves.
Oh, and if you do it for your reasoning, Nintendo's relationships with Konami sours, which is bad for them and their Wii U, which is having a dreadful box office.
Just because there was more Brawl data for Doc than Pichu doesn't mean Pichu wouldn't be a higher priority. As I have pointed out with various skillset and playstyle talks, Pichu could be a super awesome high risk and high reward character that can KO early, but gets KO'd easily.I wouldn't say that with Pichu.
Doc, sure. But Sakurai had no intention to bring Pichu back. That says a lot to me.
Hindsight... it was kind of a stupid debate. But hey! At least it made sense, unlike the stupid Fire Emblem discussions.
Sorry, I don't speak tween star.
Yes, remove one of the good things about Brawl characters when you got a whole lot of characters in Brawl with tons of awful design choices to fix.I don't really have a reasoning. I am making an assumption based on empirical data. I don't even want Snake to go, I want him to be replaced with Big Boss. Secondly, I highly doubt Konami cares if Snake makes it into Brawl. It isn't like they are marketing Phantom Pain like a Jigglypuff in a Jigglypuff shop. I don't really think Snake can be replaced. Simply removed.
A big part of that has to be that Snake was probably the best, most unique, and really most landscape changing newcomer in Brawl (if it wasn't Snake it was Olimar), whereas Sonic wasn't fully realized, and definitely has the potential to be that in a future smash bros game, which is what it looks like Sonic is realizing now.A source for what, Sakurai speaking positively of Snake?
I called people who thought that had a chance of happening out of their minds from the get-go.Medeus for SSB!
It is a personal opinion. What arguments? I literally just stated that there was no rational basis for my opinion. So I have no idea what you are talking about. I simply think Snake has lower priority based on EMPIRICAL data. MY OWN. So there is nothing to even comment on.Yes, remove one of the good things about Brawl characters when you got a whole lot of characters in Brawl with tons of awful design choices to fix.
Also, all of your arguments could and do apply to Brawl and MGS IV. Also, Konami cares a bit, but Kojima probably cares A LOTTT!!!!
Besides, who says MGS V won't come to the Wii U eventually=??? Konami seems to be playing the smart (Catch 22) card of waiting until more people own Wii U's to even consider making a Wii U release of the game. Rockstar and GTA and 2k with their series and other developers are doing the same thing.
I was being facetious.I called people who thought that had a chance of happening idiots from the get-go.
Don't even get me started there, especially since I see Palutena as less than expected (although she still has a legit "chance" at being playable, definitely).
Probably, it needs to show that it's a strong system before it gets support back. Either way, even if it did, I don't think MGS5 would make it over since it seems more at home on the consoles it's currently on.Personally, I think there is a good chance the Wii U is going to have worse third-party support in 2014 that it did in 2013 even with a larger install base.
I think MGS5 could plausibly come to the Wii U (especially considering a release date has not even been set on it), however, I am not optimistic on it happening.
We're talking about two different things then I guess. You are talking about data and chances, I'm talking about perspective, and how Snake IMO is the most "fit" character to translate well into a new game, as well as stand out as good as or more than any of the unconfirmed 17 Brawl newcomers left (which is 14 now considering Pit, Olimar, and sonic are confirmed).It is a personal opinion. What arguments? I literally just stated that there was no rational basis for my opinion. So I have no idea what you are talking about. I simply think Snake has lower priority based on EMPIRICAL data. MY OWN. So there is nothing to even comment on.
Donkey Kong Country Tropical Freeze got delayed until next year. They are going to have to ride out the entire holiday season on just Super Mario 3D World and the bundles.Probably, it needs to show that it's a strong system before it gets support back. Either way, even if it did, I don't think MGS5 would make it over since it seems more at home on the consoles it's currently on.
Why didn´t you get sooner, seriously is no sense when the people start arguing with you about Sanke and that he will not get any priority when he has really a great moveset potential, a lot of the work is done and cutting him means cutting a lot of things like music, stages, assist trophies and many more things because he is a whole series and is the representative. Thank you for having some common sense (sometimes the board needs it).^^^ I know you weren't being mean or anything like that!!!
I'm just sayin' a lot of people back in the day on the old Smash 4 thread gave me a lot of flack for saying 3 Kid Icarus characters definitely won't happen, Medusa definitely won't happen, and that I don't see us getting Palutena all that likely!
We're talking about two different things then I guess. You are talking about data and chances, I'm talking about perspective, and how Snake IMO is the most "fit" character to translate well into a new game, as well as stand out as good as or more than any of the unconfirmed 17 Brawl newcomers left (which is 14 now considering Pit, Olimar, and sonic are confirmed).
Funny, we got 2 Brawn newcomers with loads of untapped potential in Brawl confirmed (Pit and Sonic) that have been patched up quite a bit, and the 2 Brawl newcomers IMO that stand out the most, were easily the best executed, the most well designed, and just feel like their design was great (Olimar and Snake).
And Wii Sports HD Online whatever and Wii Fit U. That's a plenty fine lineup. As for DKC Tropical Freeze, that's a good move. Their early 2014 schedule needs beef, and maybe then GTA V won't effect their sales as much. Literally the whole early 2014 schedule is ripe for the picking.Donkey Kong Country Tropical Freeze got delayed until next year. They are going to have to ride out the entire holiday season on just Super Mario 3D World and the bundles.
The PS3 and Xbox 360 are going to get supported heavily until either consoles' successor console gets a huge user base. Like at least 30 million consoles for either the X-1 (I'm gonna start calling it that) or PS4, and upwards of 50 million consoles of either of them.The Wii U is at least getting multi-plats from Ubisoft and Warner Bros. Interactive, but I don't think that is going to last when those companies make their next round of AAA games for PS4/Xbone and no longer PS3/360.
There are legitimate points to be had in the probability of Snake being cut on the other side.Thank you for having some common sense (sometimes the board needs it).
.n_n.
Heck no.How many of you guys would actually prefer Snake to be cut? I know I would.
I like snake, I would like him to stay, to tbh either way i'm fine with it. I just want lyn, so that the first FE in the west can get some props...How many of you guys would actually prefer Snake to be cut? I know I would.
Nope. Snake's deserving more now than he was in Brawl.How many of you guys would actually prefer Snake to be cut? I know I would.
I want him to stay. I liked his inclusion more than Sonic's, and now that Sonic is back I really want to see him return as well.How many of you guys would actually prefer Snake to be cut? I know I would.
He would make the roster smaller if you cut him fyi.How many of you guys would actually prefer Snake to be cut? I know I would.
Snake is too unique to cut. He was a great and fun addition.How many of you guys would actually prefer Snake to be cut? I know I would.
Some people are going all "He doesn't fit in with the rest of the cast. He doesn't belong in a Nintendo All-Stars game. Durr hurr di Gurdurr." Which is silly, imo he simply shows how broad Smash Bros is.What's the reasons for preferring Snake to be cut other than that he likely kicked your bum in Brawl?
Don't dare...Johnknight1 said:Why not want the smash bros development team to cut a generic character like ROB, Lucario or Pit, or a ridiculously poorly executed character, like the Pokémon Trainer's Pokémon=???
This is all subjective. Snake is in the eyes of the competitive scene a ridiculous character in the way he was executed. His D-Throw and U-Tilt setup is ridiculous, and that's pretty much everything that makes him such a strong character. I remember when Brawl was just new there was talk about banning Snake, though that didn't last long once Meta Knight went ahead and trampled everyone down. Of course that's not a good reason to want him cut, he will need a nerf though. Just saying, Pit, Lucario and R.O.B were all better executed in what they brought to the balance of the game (and were in no way generic compared to, dare I say Toon Link?) and considering Pokémon Trainer's concept he was also pulled of pretty well (only problem is the stamina, which is stupid, and the imbalance between his Pokémons.)Also, why would you want literally one of the two best executed Brawl newcomers cut=???
Why not want the smash bros development team to cut a generic character like ROB, Lucario or Pit, or a ridiculously poorly executed character, like the Pokémon Trainer's Pokémon=???
Literally, it is like asking if you want to cut Marth or Mewtwo from Melee to Brawl. Sure, Mewtwo is more popular, but man, Marth pretty much was perfect in Melee, was more popular in Melee, and is an easier export than Mewtwo (unless you want to keep the awful Mewtwo in Melee as it is, which you shouldn't).
I say get rid of all 3rd parties kiip it all nintendo (but keep Megaman )How many of you guys would actually prefer Snake to be cut? I know I would.
Why you gotta hate on the ROBWhy not want the smash bros development team to cut a generic character like ROB, Lucario or Pit, or a ridiculously poorly executed character, like the Pokémon Trainer's Pokémon=???
Majora's Mask 3DS confirmed.Looks like A Link Between World is going all out with fanservice:
What's the reasons for preferring Snake to be cut other than that he likely kicked your bum in Brawl?
Solid Snake had his time to shine in Brawl. Time to move on and let some other 3rd party guest take the spotlight.How many of you guys would actually prefer Snake to be cut? I know I would.
I hope Simon Belmont will one day be confirmed as a playable character in SSB4 or a future Smash game.Solid Snake had his time to shine in Brawl. Time to move on and let some other 3rd party guest take the spotlight.