- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 34,018
- Location
- This Thread
- NNID
- OpossumGuy
- 3DS FC
- 4742-4911-3431
- Switch FC
- SW 2859 6322 5208
He doesn't seem very smart. He seems pretty close minded, not considering that Sakurai may take a course of action that isn't exactly what everybody wants or thinks should happen.
- What's wrong with Mewtwo being DLC? He's a returning character who was removed. Why do you think you're so sure he'll be available from the start, what matters is that he's playable. What about being DLC has no point to it? Wouldn't it make sense to have an already removed character be DLC rather than remove Lucario just so that he can be DLC?
How do you not get this? The few people (who are a minority) who want Pokemon Trainer cut want him cut because he takes up as much dev time as three characters. By replacing him with another trainer, you are not only removing the characters, but also taking up the development time (the whole reason they wanted him cut to begin with). Just put the original Pokemon Trainer there. You don't need to rep every generation. That's just foolish. And who's to say for sure they all won't return? That's the only naivety here...
- People need to stop acting like they are so sure every Pokemon is going to return, that's just so naive. I'm trying to add a Gen 6 rep, it's most likely Newtwo will just be a Final Smash like Super Sonic. We have 4 Gen 1 reps. First you're all talking about removing Pokemon Trainer entirely which is stupid, and when someone just makes it a Gen 6 Trainer, there's a problem. I realize the populariyt of Squirtle, IvySaur, and Charizard, but again not every Pokemon is going to return. What do you suggest?
There's also nothing implying that Sonic and Snake won't return. Logic is a two-way street. Once again, cuts are not absolutely confirmed. Second of all, you say that Nintendo characters should be prioritized, and yet you add Bomberman, when Snake is infinitely more likely? It makes no logical sense.
- Also you don't know Third-Parties are going to return, nothing even implies that. This roster will have cuts, it makes sense to prioritize Nintendo Fighters in a Nintendo Fighting game. Third-Parties have only appeared once, so there's nothing saying they aren't gonna be a one time thing.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your idea for Dry Bowser was as a transformation at the end of a Final Smash with different moves, as well as claiming that it doesn't take up development time. He only works as an Alternate Costume. The idea previously described has a lot of factors wrong with it to work. And once again, Metal Mario is completely redundant with Mario being in the game, as well as the Metal Box item.i·de·a
- Already explained why there is nothing wrong with Dry Bowser.
/īˈdēə/
Noun
Why is Metal Mario NOT considered an idea?
- A thought or suggestion as to a possible course of action: "the idea of linking pay to performance".
- A concept or mental impression.
Newsflash: It's nice that you know what an idea is, but you seem to be forgetting that some ideas can be bad ideas.
Fix'dI swear, with some people it's just logic and reasoning.