Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
1.VictiniTop Pokemon For Smash:
1. Mewtwo
I also want 2. Mew too
3. Mewtwo Y
4. Lucario Mega
5. Mew2King
Greninja. Nuff saidTop 5 Pokemon:
1. Entei
1. Mewtwo
2. Hawlucha
3.MegaBlaziken
4. Lucario
5. Zoroark
It's about time we got a quadrupedal Smash character. I mean, I love me some Ivysaur, but he's awfully stumpy. Somebody who can devastate with their legs, and I think the people who care about things and stuff would be against Epona's inclusion. So, go Entei.Pokémon newcomer is going to be Entei.
Quit kidding yourselves, guys.
I should just have a copy of my Snake rants on hand for anyone who thinks he's for sure going to get the axe. I PITY TEH FOOS.
Anyway, Snake shouldn't be cut. Here's why in a short amount of time:
1) If Sakurai cared about Snake hardly being memorable to Nintendo, that would have stopped him from getting in the first time
2) Third Party spots are reserved for Legendary characters only, meaning that Snake is eligible here as well.
3) Snake can't just be "cut". There are contracts to be written and such, meaning that Sakurai can't just back out last minutes and say, "OOPS. MUH BAD" If Snake is planned, then he is already in. Especially if Sakurai is honest in saying that all characters are planned to return as long as time allows.
4) MGS has always been on other systems, but it all comes back to reason #1. If it didn't matter then, it doesn't matter now.
5) Kojima wanted Snake in for 2 reasons. First, for his son to be able to play as one of his father's characters, and second, because he wanted younger players to be introduced to MGS. I don't see any problems with that.
Wouldn't Mewtwo and Charizard be returning veterans?Top Pokemon Newcomers for Smash
1. Mewtwo
2. Charizard
3. Meowth
I don't care if it's not going to happen realistically at all.Signs(pure speculation on my part) are pointing to a Gen 3 remake, yes. I suspect the Gen 5 games didn't include Ruby/Sapphire remakes only because they were on the regular DS and could thus interact with the original Gen 3 games.
Also, I thought I'd post my roster.
View attachment 7389
I am fully aware how unlikely some of my choices are, so I arranged the roster so that ignoring the rightmost column suddenly makes the roster much more realistic. Also, Hoenn Trainer is interchangeable with Kanto Trainer if one sees fit, since I honestly couldn't decide on one or the other.
Not if they cut Pokemon Trainer, as the character is Pokemon Trainer, not Charizard.Wouldn't Mewtwo and Charizard be returning veterans?
----
Umm I'm sorry what are you talking about?
Samus didn't change at all in Brawl she got I new add on move (super missles) that's it. Zero Samus was a completely different character and got in because after metroid Zero Mission she was the face of metroid. Midna on the other hand, while well liked was
1. only in one game
2. not the face of zelda (link and the triforce are)
3. not even the main character.........
so there is absolutely no reason to put her with link. Midna isn't Link and Samus is Samus your arguement is invalid.
And while wolf link is link, it again makes no sense to use this as a final smash because wolf link is a cursed/worse version of link. The triforce being part of his final smash because he is one of ONLY three people in his world to have it's unique power. FURTHERMORE this link isn't twilight princess link, it is the link from the new game coming out on the Wii U.
I did not say to add Impa/T. Zelda/Vaati, I said that they are much more likely to appear over Girahim who has almost no chance whatsoever of making Smash 4.
Also don't just say you disagree. State why otherwise you make no valid argument for yourself.
I think the earthbound guys are fine as long as they are next to each other.
I believe I gave a neutral for Dixie because she isn't more or less likely than K. Rool and a Neutral for Chrom/Lucina because Chrom can easily get in while Lucina is much less likely..
Can you make, like, a single sentence version of this? I have no idea what to take from this.The main mechanic of Twilight Princess was transforming into a wolf, which TP Link can do. It's just weird that he can't do what makes him, him in Smash Bros. And instead he does a "triforce slash". This incarnation of Link is only in one game. TP Link is Wolf Link. Midna transforms them. If you think I said Midna and Link are the same person I am going to question your ability to read. Transforming into Wolf Link was a bigger deal than the Gale Boomerang. Every Zelda game has it's one main unique factor. ALBW has Ravio's Bracelet, OoT had young to adult travel, MM has masks... and so on. He's not transforming into Midna, he's transforming into Wolf Link. Which is Link plus a Shadow Crystal. And Midna is always on his back. Her magic and hair would be the special moves, Wolf Link would scratch, claw, pounce for standards. It would separate Link from Toon Link. And unlike Samus users in Melee and Brawl, Link users that didn't like the mechanic would be able to go to Link #2, Toon Link. His play-style isn't that unique, Toon Link is really just a lighter Link with a better recovery, and is shorter. Overall, the inclusion wouldn't hurt anybody, but would help separate the 2. Maybe Toon Link could get a unique Final Smash from WW or PH. This would only be good, and I honestly think it was a missed opportunity in Brawl. I disagree with Impa, Toon Zelda, and Vaati and have already posted giant freakin' essays on them. No thanks. After a third of Twilight Princess, Wolf Link is used to solve puzzles and complete certain tasks, it's only a curse for a third of the game. This Link is easily Twilight Princess Link. And if it's Zelda U Link, which I think it is too. Then that means Zelda U is a sequel to Twilight Princess. Since these are slightly altered HD models from TP. Just look at SS and OoT, they don't just barely change Zelda and Link's design in each installment. So if this is Zelda U Link, Wolf Link and Midna became very worthy options, as this means a game without a release date has already affected the game, so it can affect it's characters. And I don't think Dixie is equal to King K Rool, Nintendo has shown no interest in returning the character in his own series. Yet Dixie got a big ND announcement. And Cranky got the big VGX announcement. If KKR is a secret boss in Tropical Freeze, I'll put him on my roster in a heartbeat. What does Chrom do that Marth and Ike don't? And Lucina? Name one sword duo in SSB. That's why.
Too many dual sword users now.With the beam sword turned on, everyone's a sword user.
Forgive me, I'm feeling very philosophical today.
So this is why Link turned into Wolf Link in Brawl right?The main mechanic of Twilight Princess was transforming into a wolf, which TP Link can do. It's just weird that he can't do what makes him, him in Smash Bros. And instead he does a "triforce slash". This incarnation of Link is only in one game. TP Link is Wolf Link. Midna transforms them. If you think I said Midna and Link are the same person I am going to question your ability to read. Transforming into Wolf Link was a bigger deal than the Gale Boomerang. Every Zelda game has it's one main unique factor. ALBW has Ravio's Bracelet, OoT had young to adult travel, MM has masks... and so on. He's not transforming into Midna, he's transforming into Wolf Link. Which is Link plus a Shadow Crystal. And Midna is always on his back. Her magic and hair would be the special moves, Wolf Link would scratch, claw, pounce for standards. It would separate Link from Toon Link. And unlike Samus users in Melee and Brawl, Link users that didn't like the mechanic would be able to go to Link #2, Toon Link. His play-style isn't that unique, Toon Link is really just a lighter Link with a better recovery, and is shorter. Overall, the inclusion wouldn't hurt anybody, but would help separate the 2. Maybe Toon Link could get a unique Final Smash from WW or PH. This would only be good, and I honestly think it was a missed opportunity in Brawl. I disagree with Impa, Toon Zelda, and Vaati and have already posted giant freakin' essays on them. No thanks. After a third of Twilight Princess, Wolf Link is used to solve puzzles and complete certain tasks, it's only a curse for a third of the game. This Link is easily Twilight Princess Link. And if it's Zelda U Link, which I think it is too. Then that means Zelda U is a sequel to Twilight Princess. Since these are slightly altered HD models from TP. Just look at SS and OoT, they don't just barely change Zelda and Link's design in each installment. So if this is Zelda U Link, Wolf Link and Midna became very worthy options, as this means a game without a release date has already affected the game, so it can affect it's characters.
what I ended up reading.The main mechanic of Twilight Princess was transforming into a wolf, which TP Link can do. It's just weird that he can't do what makes him, him in Smash Bros.
[A bunch of other suff I skipped over]
That's why.
Subjective.
You play Pokemon for the Pokemon, not the trainer. It's why is the game called "Pokemon" not "Pokemon Trainer" or "Gotta catch em all"
Zelda/Shiek makes sense as a transformation, and doesn't take as much work as 3 characters together. You can add the 3 Pokemon Trainer Pokemon as seperate characters and it would be easier, and it would still make sense. Also, I never talked about priority.
3 characters as one =/= 3 slots, time wise. Sakurai said himself that adding characters to Smash is not addition, rather, its multiplication. If that is indeed true, you can think of more than one character in a slot as exponential. Balance has been discussed before, and its not easy to do such a thing with a character like this. It takes alot of time.
I will use Zelda/Shiek as a comparison. When balancing the roster, this is the process it must take:
Now, Pokemon Trainer:
- Zelda by herself
- Shiek by herself
- Zelda/Shiek by themselves
- Zelda against everyone
- Shiek against everyone
- Zelda/Shiek together against everyone.
- Charizard by himself
- Squirtle by himself
- Ivysaur by himself
- Charizard/Squirtle against everyone
- Charizard/Ivysaur against everyone
- Ivysaur/Squirtle against everyone
- Charizard/Ivysaur/Squirtle with themselves
So, Zelda/Shiek is 6 steps, Pokemon Trainer is 14. Zelda/Shiek was a new concept when introduced in Melee, so it fit well. We haven't seen Zelda without a Shiek transformation, so we dont know how it would work. Pokemon can exist without a trainer, as seen with every other pokemon in Smash, which is what i was trying to accomplish with Charizard in the roster.
- Charizard against everyone
- Squirtle against everyone
- Ivysaur against everyone
- Charizard/Squirtle against everyone
- Charizard/Ivysaur against everyone
- Ivysaur/Squirtle against everyone
- Charizard/Ivysaur/Squirtle against everyone
While the idea of Pokemon Trainer wasn't bad, it was poorly executed. The whole concept of him wasn't well recieved either, with the stamina mechanic and the weaknesses mechanic. The pokemon were fairly underpowered to make up for their variety of moves, but it was unsatisfying to play as.
I guess we should just take the time away in developing newcomers so that this one slot can be created. thats pretty exciting
That was a mistake, I meant ST.You know very well I meant character-wise. Don't even...
PS... the Spirit Train is from Spirit Tracks, not Phantom Hourglass.
The names of some of Zelda's moves are the same as the names of the magic Link used in OoT. PH was a sequel to WW.That was a mistake, I meant ST.
and even character-wise it's still not true, Zelda has OoT inspired moves and Toon Link represents PH.
I know you must have seen this reply coming, but Sheik is only in OoT. And is a transformation for Zelda in SSB. A one time character. Transforming from an incarnation that doesn't actually transform at all. So even if we have Zelda U Link and for some reason he's not the same Link as TP Link, he can still transform into Wolf Link, and Midna would be on his back.Overall the Zelda series is too big to have character only representing specific games. That's why all the current cast are character that can represent multiple games. Link represent all the Links, Zelda represent all the Zeldas, Ganondorf represent all Ganons, Toon Link represent the younger Links and the toon style.
1. Kamek is not the same as magikoopa. Even in Japan. (Even though kamek is the race and the character, there is THE kamek, similar to waddle Dee but unlike toad)
Blaziken, Lucario...and that's it.CHALLENGE IDEA
If no Kanto characters are playable in Smash and there were six Pokemon characters, (PK Trainers count as one) who would they be?
Adding Jigglypuff as a secret character for the fourth time would be the LAST thing we'd ever expect.It would be anticlimactic if the Pokemon Company ordered Sakurai to not show anything on the SSB4 website if they were only going to keep the Pokemon Brawl veterans plus Mewtwo. Why the secrecy if we were only going to get the same Pokemon we already played with for the last 6+ years?
You're definitely not alone. I've seen a lot of people suggest it.Speaking of Yoshi...am I the only one hoping that Egg Shoot changes to a side B to work more like the actual egg-throwing from Yoshi's Island, it'd give Yoshi alot of great tools from a distance and make it feel more like actual Yoshi from Yoshi's Island.
This is a really interesting item. I didn't play Skyward Sword, so was it an item you used on yourself or on your opponent?Beetle confirmed as an item!I wonder if it will work similarly to the Steel Driver.
"Pic of the day. The Beetle item from The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword is a comical item that grabs characters and carries them into the air."
Nevermind that Steel Driver thing.
Pretty sexy pic of the day, IMO.
So? This is a crossover fighting game. When has canon been the focus of a crossover fighting game?I know you must have seen this reply coming, but Sheik is only in OoT. And is a transformation for Zelda in SSB. A one time character. Transforming from an incarnation that doesn't actually transform at all.
That won't be happening though, the change is too radical and make Link an entirely different character. That's like saying Dedede should be able to become Masked Dedede by using his down special or that F.L.U.D.D. should be an alternate moveset for Mario. You're diverting away from what the character was originally intended for and you're not making Link the same character from the previous game that people are accustomed to playing as. It's just not going to happen to Link, if you want a Wolf Link + Midna make them a separate character all together instead of hindering Link.So even if we have Zelda U Link and for some reason he's not the same Link as TP Link, he can still transform into Wolf Link, and Midna would be on his back. Anyways Wolf Link and Midna could happen if it was implemented as part of Link, because it is part of Link.
Many of the characters that were only in 1-3 games are representing their own franchise. Things work differently when you're part of a large franchise like LoZ.And Ghirahim. Well... I don't mind if he's not included, but there are better reasons against the other characters than him only representing one game. We have non-Zelda characters on the roster that were only in one game. And many that were only in 2 or 3.
I'm just saying that if you're expecting Link to become Wolf Link in his moveset, you're setting yourself up for disappointment. Support whoever you like, don't let me stop you from doing that.Really, all I wanted from this game was to play as Midna and Rosalina. I already got Rosalina so I'm going to support this new transformation w/o consent of the people of SmashBoards.
I guess it matters when you are talking about Metroid and Zelda. Though it clearly shouldn't.So? This is a crossover fighting game. When has canon been the focus of a crossover fighting game?
Your user name upsets me!I guess it matters when you are talking about Metroid and Zelda. Though it clearly shouldn't.
Even if they look like specific incarnation of the characters, I find it much more likely that they are a generic Link and Zelda that just use the most detailed/modern designs. The way i see it Zelda isn't TP zelda, she just looks like it. same goes for Link. Zelda just use the Sheik because the other Zelda's don't have much usable, while Link have no need to take from specific Incarnation.I know you must have seen this reply coming, but Sheik is only in OoT. And is a transformation for Zelda in SSB. A one time character. Transforming from an incarnation that doesn't actually transform at all. So even if we have Zelda U Link and for some reason he's not the same Link as TP Link, he can still transform into Wolf Link, and Midna would be on his back.
Like Ariand/AEM said those characters are mostly the main characters of their own series, while Ghirahim is a minor character in the zelda series. Also one of the main reasons for the predictions being wrong is because focus on popularity and since the only thing Ghirahim really has going for him is popularity, it doesn't look good for him.And Ghirahim. Well... I don't mind if he's not included, but there are better reasons against the other characters than him only representing one game. We have non-Zelda characters on the roster that were only in one game. And many that were only in 2 or 3.
Really, all I wanted from this game was to play as Midna and Rosalina. I already got Rosalina so I'm going to support this new transformation w/o consent of the people of SmashBoards.
I had with a mistake skipped the part of the original post where you said it was partially want roster, so sorry for bothering you. I have nothing against the characters I just don't find them likely.And if Toon Zelda/Impa/Vaati get added as the 5th instead of Ghirahim. Yay, I guess. I love the series more than any other. Even though I argue against him the most and he's probably the least likely of the 3, I'd personally want it to be Vaati... well, I like female characters more... I just don't see Tetra or Impa being unique from Sheik. Or Toon Zelda being unique from Zelda. When Toon Link is a clone with a reason to be added. I really hope the series gets a character. I guess I don't care who it is that much... oh god I forgot Tingle. Hopefully, if they add him, they'll realize he is much more established in his own series than Yoshi. I'd only be fine with Tingle if he was a Tingle character with moves from his own games.
Well that was my ramble of the day. This is also to whoever else I was arguing with. Meh. I just want more Zelda. And this pic of the day got me hyped up for some.
Gen1- Pikachu, bulbasaur, squirtle, charizard, mewtwo,Blaziken, Lucario...and that's it.
I guess you could make a case for Zoroark, Victini, Genesect, Gardevoir or Deoyxs, but there's not really anyone special from Gen 2 that stands above the rest, nor Gen 6. A lot like Greninja, but is he really anymore important than the other two?
Guess you could always just have Gen 2-Gen 6 Pokemon Trainers if they counted as one each and then Lucario. There's probably a reason Gen 1 is deemed the most important in all honesty.
.
Add Meowth to that initial list due to the anime's Team Rocket and Eevee, and I guess I agree.Gen1- Pikachu, bulbasaur, squirtle, charizard, mewtwo,
Gen2- ..... pichu? Scizor maybe
Gen3- blaziken, deoxys, plusle&minun,
Gen4-lucario
Gen5-victini, zoroark, genesect
Gen6-greninja, sylveon, mega mewtwo y
This is basically the more notable, memorable, and popular pokemon from each gen. So these I see as smash candidates
In Skyward Sword, it was used to grab items or press switches from far away. Did you ever play Wind Waker? It's like using the seagulls from that game.This is a really interesting item. I didn't play Skyward Sword, so was it an item you used on yourself or on your opponent?
In addition to the list of significant Pokemon...Add Meowth to that initial list due to the anime's Team Rocket and Eevee, and I guess I agree.
I dunno, maybe Piplup for 4th gen too. Dawn was a pretty big thing, and Piplup had a decent role in Pikachu's Adventure games.
See? That's what EVERYONE says! So he must be viable.Can someone convince me for his inclusion I want to want him in
He did. This thing looks like it's going to be overpowered as all hell. Unless it is slow like it is in the game.This is a really interesting item. I didn't play Skyward Sword, so was it an item you used on yourself or on your opponent?
It looks like Link may have thrown it at Marth, but I'm not 100% sure.
Maybe you can break out of it like any other grapple.He did. This thing looks like it's going to be overpowered as all hell. Unless it is slow like it is in the game.