I dunno. I just came to like Impa and Vaati more.Really? What changed?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I dunno. I just came to like Impa and Vaati more.Really? What changed?
I think Chrom will end up staying as a regular lord seeing how Ike in Brawl is using the ranger class, the first class Ike is in.Chrom's moveset doesn't have to be a clone of Marth's. When Chrom advances to Great Lord he gets the ability to use Lances. You could make a few lance moves. Chrom also gets a Shield, you can add things like reflect and block. He also has a different dancing blade style. His is a lot slower but it's also very clea in style. You could even make him more unique by giving him a partner such as Lucina, you can do combo moves, start one move and finish it with the other.
I like the idea of 4 Fire Emblem slots, but would it be necessary for this Smash?4 DK and 4 Fire Emblem reps would really solve some problems around here. Furthermore, these series have so much history that they are worthy of that many characters.
His FABULOUS personality.Ghirahim just reminds me way too much of Zant back in Brawl speculation days. What makes Ghirahim any more significant than Zant or any other non-Ganon villain?
Says the guy who put Isabelle in his rosters.I play Kirby games all the time, but again, Bandana Dee just sucks as a possible newcomer, it's so underwhelming.
but bandanna dee was playable and a main character of return to dreamlandThis is Kirby, not Mario. Besides, at least Rosalina has had more importance in a game than being a mid-boss and a character in a mini-game, she a main part of Super Mario Galaxy, and while not playable, she's very important to the plot and the game itself wouldn't be possible without her. Also, why the hell are we comparing a cosmic entity to a a monkey wearing a bandana?
Zero Suit Samus is is still Samus, and does not qualify as the second Metroid character. Also, this topic is a joke.
...For shame!I dunno. I just came to like Impa and Vaati more.
...well, yes, but that was more of a joke thing than anything.Says the guy who put Isabelle in his rosters.
MarthI like the idea of 4 Fire Emblem slots, but would it be necessary for this Smash?
4 fire emblem and 4 dk? Gee, that seems a bit...4 DK and 4 Fire Emblem reps would really solve some problems around here. Furthermore, these series have so much history that they are worthy of that many characters.
As far as I'm concered, nothing. Both him and Zant can be fun to play in a fighting game though. But they aren't important to Nintendo as a whole. Hell, no Zelda character really needed other than Link, Zelda, Ganondorf, and to Sakurai, a Younger Link.Ghirahim just reminds me way too much of Zant back in Brawl speculation days. What makes Ghirahim any more significant than Zant or any other non-Ganon villain?
It's necessary to keep y'all from killing each other in the Fire Emblem thread.Is anything more Marth and Ike necessary? 2 is good enough. (Unless if it's Anna.)
So you think he'll be demoted to just a background character, even after his roles have only improved with each title? That's just insulting.I never said stage hazard, first of all. I just said part of the background, like in 64. I just discussed how I felt in reply to pizzadudeman, so it's just a hunch I have, nothing more.
Second, as much as I agree with you that Metroid truly only has one rep, it's Sakurai's word. There are two reps in his eyes, which means there are two reps in the game, so saying otherwise is a joke.
Are these really questions?Bandanna Dee sucks how...? And yet Shulk is a great choice...?
Wait, ROY?!?! Allow me to go throw up in the corner.Marth
Roy
Ike
Fire Emblem Awakening rep
It's beautiful.
Yes, they are. Now answer them.So you think he'll be demoted to just a background character, even after his roles have only improved with each title? That's just insulting.
Are these really questions?
Is this something like Bandana Dee or Ganon? XDSo here's a new topic, who would you rather have for a newcomer, a spear user or a trident user?
Purely out of fighting style? Trident. It's like a spear with three prongs.So here's a new topic, who would you rather have for a newcomer, a spear user or a trident user?
Yeah basically. I just want to see how this goes if people prefer a fork or a toothpick.Is this something like Bandana Dee or Ganon? XD
He was a playable character so there could be four player multiplayer.but bandanna dee was playable and a main character of return to dreamland
Again, people ask for unique choices, get called out for picking something people didn't think made sense, the mentality of people these days are so flip-flopped it's hard to take seriously. Besides, mine was a joke, what say your choices?Says the guy who put Isabelle in his rosters.
Fighting Style: Spear.So here's a new topic, who would you rather have for a newcomer, a spear user or a trident user?
They'll do the same thing more or less. A really long weapon focused on pokes. If we're talking specific characters. Bandanna Dee, Krystal, Beast Ganon or Chrom with a lance are probably the popular choices. Mostly the former two. Anyone else from Nintendo that uses a spear, and is worth using?So here's a new topic, who would you rather have for a newcomer, a spear user or a trident user?
I don't know, maybe. Maybe he'll be a background and a boss fight, who knows? All I'm saying is that I (myself, first-person, me) believe that it is leaning towards background character than playable. But Sakurai has done this before with that Galaxy picture in September, so I don't know. Ridley's plausible, but I'm lowering my expectations, and will prepare myself for the worst, because frnakly that's all we can really do for this game or else we'll be disappointed with the final product since it doesn't match our preconceived visions and ideals of a perfect roster.So you think he'll be demoted to just a background character, even after his roles have only improved with each title? That's just insulting.
SPEAR!! Just give the trident to .So here's a new topic, who would you rather have for a newcomer, a spear user or a trident user?
A TRIDENT user you say?So here's a new topic, who would you rather have for a newcomer, a spear user or a trident user?
Did you smack this guy? He deserves to be smacked on so many levels.Another comment from my subscriber that hates Mewtwo:
"Still he was cut he will be cut Forever. First gen is way long past Mewtwo is not going to be in ssb4 unless they have a FireRed2 and a LeafGreen2 which will most likely never happen it doesn't matter if he is popular because he was already cut so it will be a staple that he was cut. I would be pointless to have a character in 2 games but not the one between and he is losing relevance actually because 1st gen is way long past again. Having both Mewtwo and Lucario is like having more clones. It doesn't matter if Hawlucha and Pangoro are popular or relevant because Rosalina is not popular. You also seem to be major over representation the mega evolutions which is way too new unless they are really planning a future out of mega evolutions. You have 4 1st gen reps and 1 4th gen rep but no 6th gen rep"
Ghirahim, indeed, is not important to the franchise. But he's more comparable to Midna than Zant. And like I said before, just because Sakurai chose mainstays for one game doesn't mean he'll do it again. I could get lucky, and get my character. I want to clarify why I think he could make it using Rosalina as an example:As far as I'm concered, nothing. Both him and Zant can be fun to play in a fighting game though. But they aren't important to Nintendo as a whole. Hell, no Zelda character really needed other than Link, Zelda, Ganondorf, and to Sakurai, a Younger Link.
Even if I like Vaati, he ain't that important. More of a pipe dream if you ask me.
I guess in the lore of Zelda, Ghirahim is important, more so than Zant anyway. But that has nothing to do in Smash.
I don't totally get why Roy is supported either, but he's popular for some reason. In addition, I think he can be de-cloned based on his battle animations in FE6. So I included him in the list to make people happy.Wait, ROY?!?! Allow me to go throw up in the corner.
What is there against another KI rep?I've never thought a second KI rep was that likely. I think Ridley is worth it, and still has no hard evidence against it.
...We're on Ridley, Kirby, DK, and Fire Emblem.While I do agree that Ganon is the most important Zelda character yet to be added, he's already Ganondorf's Final Smash.
Impa is still more likely to happen.
Nothing too wrong with that. You could have brought back a few Kirby characters, like Gooey. But they didn't. He showed up a few times before, so it's not like Blue/Yellow Toad, who showed up from a lack of creativity.He was a playable character so there could be four player multiplayer.
Again, people ask for unique choices, get called out for picking something people didn't think, the mentality of people these days are so flip-flopped it's hard to take seriously. Besides, mine was a joke, what say your choices?
In my opinion, the difference between MOTHER and Kid Icarus as far as character representation goes is representation for the games themselves. Between Melee and Brawl, MOTHER 3 was released, which was a big game, so it makes sense to add Lucas since Ness isn't a part of MOTHER 3. However, Kid Icarus Uprising still focuses on Pit, so it isn't as necessary to add a new KI character. Yes, there's characters to add; it doesn't have anything to do with either being small. But it isn't as comparable to MOTHER's situation. This is also why I think something from Awakening is more likely than Roy.What is there against another KI rep?
Mother is a small series as well, and got 2 reps.
Honestly I think that KI has more merits than Mother at this point.