BluePikmin11
Akko is my dear daughter!
For any franchise? A good guy I guess.So, for a second character, would you want a bad guy or good guy?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
For any franchise? A good guy I guess.So, for a second character, would you want a bad guy or good guy?
there have been other Kirby games with 4 multiple characters. . .in fact you can have multiple kirby's in return to dreamland. . .why have bandana dee playable in that game if he wasnt important?He was a playable character so there could be four player multiplayer.
Again, people ask for unique choices, get called out for picking something people didn't think made sense, the mentality of people these days are so flip-flopped it's hard to take seriously. Besides, mine was a joke, what say your choices?
For what series? This isn't like we're talking about our second newcomer. We'd be waiting on our fifth.So, for a second character, would you want a bad guy or good guy?
A robot who cant make moral choicesSo, for a second character, would you want a bad guy or good guy?
Do you want to see my roster? because I don't have one now XDAgain, people ask for unique choices, get called out for picking something people didn't think made sense, the mentality of people these days are so flip-flopped it's hard to take seriously. Besides, mine was a joke, what say your choices?
Traditionally, Smash has done good guys; Luigi over Bowser, Zelda over Ganondorf (sure, they were added simultaneously, but Zelda was a bigger priority to make unique), Diddy over K. Rool, etc...there's a good number of more examples.So, for a second character, would you want a bad guy or good guy?
I meant like a second character for each series. So, basically, Luigi or Bowser? K. Rool or Dixie/Cranky? Zelda or Ganondorf?For what series? This isn't like we're talking about our second newcomer. We'd be waiting on our fifth.
Are you trying to tell me that they're going to put anthony higgs over ridley!?!?!?!?!?Traditionally, Smash has done good guys; Luigi over Bowser, Zelda over Ganondorf (sure, they were added simultaneously, but Zelda was a bigger priority to make unique), Diddy over K. Rool, etc...there's a good number of more examples.
I'd love to see your roster, I already know it will be different because it has Bandanna Dee.Do you want to see my roster? because I don't have one now XD
Oh god, did I seriously put Anna on this roster?I think Shulk is, sadly, in the same spot as Isaac or Saki. Maybe a little stronger.
So glad I can post again, here's my roster if this is the right place for one...
View attachment 5544
I like this kid.It's necessary to keep y'all from killing each other in the Fire Emblem thread.
Because of the recent success of Super Star Ultra before the game's development.there have been other Kirby games with 4 multiple characters. . .in fact you can have multiple kirby's in return to dreamland. . .why have bandana dee playable in that game if he wasnt important?
Do you think for a second, that if Return to Dreamland was a one player-only game where you can play as multiple characters, that Bandanna Dee would be playable?Nothing too wrong with that. You could have brought back a few Kirby characters, like Gooey. But they didn't. He showed up a few times before, so it's not like Blue/Yellow Toad, who showed up from a lack of creativity.
I also agree that an Awakening rep is more likely than Roy, but I would say that Uprising did change the game a little bit.In my opinion, the difference between MOTHER and Kid Icarus as far as character representation goes is representation for the games themselves. Between Melee and Brawl, MOTHER 3 was released, which was a big game, so it makes sense to add Lucas since Ness isn't a part of MOTHER 3. However, Kid Icarus Uprising still focuses on Pit, so it isn't as necessary to add a new KI character. Yes, there's characters to add; it doesn't have anything to do with either being small. But it isn't as comparable to MOTHER's situation. This is also why I think something from Awakening is more likely than Roy.
Hey, I haven't seen you in a while too! Hey Protom!A robot who cant make moral choices
Also, haven't seen you in a while. Hi.
Ridley deconfirmed.Are you trying to tell me that they're going to put anthony higgs over ridley!?!?!?!?!?
OK,I will make one XDI'd love to see your roster, I already know it will be different because it has Bandanna Dee.
Nah, they did Zero Suit Samus alreadyAre you trying to tell me that they're going to put anthony higgs over ridley!?!?!?!?!?
It's not a bad thing to put Anna on the roster, I think she has a somewhat of a chance to get in and get recommended by IS based on the amount of roles she just started having in FE:A.Oh god, did I seriously put Anna on this roster?
Ah I see. Well here. I even threw in third parties.I meant like a second character for each series. So, basically, Luigi or Bowser? K. Rool or Dixie/Cranky? Zelda or Ganondorf?
Considering I can already see it outlined in my mind, no, because Kirby will have too many characters.Do you want to see my roster? because I don't have one now XD
They already put in Zero Suit Samus, an add-on character, over Ridley. Ridley is the definitive next character. Also, Anthony Higgs? At least it's not as bad as the people asking for a Hunter or Rundas.Are you trying to tell me that they're going to put anthony higgs over ridley!?!?!?!?!?
Why is it a joke?Zero Suit Samus is is still Samus, and does not qualify as the second Metroid character. Also, this topic is a joke.
Hell and yes. Would love to see Smash out in Summer of 14, would really give me something to do, plus all my friends are saving up for the 3DS version so we can take out all our vented rage towards each other.http://mynintendonews.com/2013/12/3...super-smash-bros-3ds-wii-u-completed-in-2014/
So this article is on a interview with Sakurai and it seems Sakurai really wants to see this game in 2014, even making it his New Year's Resolution. Thoughts?
Nah, they did Zero Suit Samus already
It is a requirement to release it in 2014 as it marks the 125th anniversary of Nintendo and the 15th anniversary of the Super Smash Bros series.http://mynintendonews.com/2013/12/3...super-smash-bros-3ds-wii-u-completed-in-2014/
So this article is on a interview with Sakurai and it seems Sakurai really wants to see this game in 2014, even making it his New Year's Resolution. Thoughts?
It's still Samus, they're semi-interchangable characters, they're all in the same slot, it's 1 character in definition. And to just go ahead and say "That's enough for Metroid" is again insulting.Why is it a joke?
If the guy in charge says that Zero Suit Samus is the second Metroid character, then that's really all there is to it. You can think otherwise if you choose to, but expect to be called out every time you say Metroid has 1 character.
For these reasons, I DO like Palutena as the most probable choice for a second Kid Icarus character, should it receive one. However, I still hold that the situation is not the same as Lucas' addition; if Palutena were added, it would be a kind of character addition we've never seen in SSB before.I also agree that an Awakening rep is more likely than Roy, but I would say that Uprising did change the game a little bit.
Uprising re-invented the Kid Icarus franchise, and introduced many new and interesting personalities. I would go as far to say that without Pit and Palutena's playful banter, the game would not have been as entertaining as it was.
Sure, the game focused on Pit. But it also made it so that the Kid Icarus franchise could not be complete without Palutena. Palutena broke free from her damsel in distress role and became not only the DiD, but the secondary hero/sidekick, and even the VILLAIN at one point.
So I am sticking with my claim that Palutena is very necessary. Arguably as necessary as Lucas was.
Also the fact that Nintendo desperately needs these games released ASAP so they can actually hold on to this generation of consoles.It is a requirement to release it in 2014 as it marks the 125th anniversary of Nintendo and the 15th anniversary of the Super Smash Bros series.
By ironic thought, they could celebrate the 125th anniversary of Nintendo by revealing a Hanafuda character.It is a requirement to release it in 2014 as it marks the 125th anniversary of Nintendo and the 15th anniversary of the Super Smash Bros series.
Peachy didn't say the two are enough for Metroid, though.And to just go ahead and say "That's enough for Metroid" is again insulting.
If they felt that they needed four different playstyles, then yes he most likely would be in Return to Dreamland. Since Gooey lacks limbs to represent a weapon style like Meta Knight, Dedede, and now Bandanna Dee do.Because of the recent success of Super Star Ultra before the game's development.
Do you think for a second, that if Return to Dreamland was a one player-only game where you can play as multiple characters, that Bandanna Dee would be playable?
No, Anthony is equally as bad as asking for Rundas or the Hunters. They are cool characters. But said characters, only have one game under their belt. Only if Anthony shows up again, will I change my mind on this matter.Considering I can already see it outlined in my mind, no, because Kirby will have too many characters.
They already put in Zero Suit Samus, an add-on character, over Ridley. Ridley is the definitive next character. Also, Anthony Higgs? At least it's not as bad as the people asking for a Hunter or Rundas.
No Ridley, No K.Rool, Chrom replacing Roy, that an I think you can spare about five more characters as 40 is quite small.I have a new roster. It has about six less characters, but I think everyone will be satisfied with it.
View attachment 5585
I never said he did, it was a universal response.Peachy didn't say the two are enough for Metroid, though.
I think you should cut more veterans if you intend to keep at 40, not enough newcomers.I have a new roster. It has about six less characters, but I think everyone will be satisfied with it.
View attachment 5585
Nothing of interest.What did I miss the last 3 pages?
...My roster,I'm ready.
40 Slots? Cut Brawl Veterans? Chrom over Ike? Assist Trophies suddenly higher priority? No Snake? What is this?I have a new roster. It has about six less characters, but I think everyone will be satisfied with it.
View attachment 5585
No K. Rool, no Lucario, no Ridley. I'm not happy, sorry.I have a new roster. It has about six less characters, but I think everyone will be satisfied with it.
View attachment 5585
I made a few statements you'd probably disagree with. Maybe a couple you'd agree with as well.What did I miss the last 3 pages?
So nothing new?I made a few statements you'd probably disagree with. Maybe a couple you'd agree with as well.