FinalStarmen
Smash Ace
Okay, over with the Pokémon / Zoroark-shouldn't-be-in-before-Mewtwo-Lucario-Jigglypuff-or-Pokémon Trainer- discussion and move up to the new subject...
![]()
Impa
Well, I'm done for the day. I shall see you all tomorrow.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Okay, over with the Pokémon / Zoroark-shouldn't-be-in-before-Mewtwo-Lucario-Jigglypuff-or-Pokémon Trainer- discussion and move up to the new subject...
![]()
Impa
Okay, over with the Pokémon / Zoroark-shouldn't-be-in-before-Mewtwo-Lucario-Jigglypuff-or-Pokémon Trainer- discussion and move up to the new subject...
![]()
Impa
On second hand, I'd have Skyward Impa for 5th Rep. Not. Replacing. Sheik.
Lucario, Ike and jigglypuff fans are getting the same crap your not alone.it still does, and if you want to hear a heap lot more of it, go to the other sites,
I've been hearing the same crap about wolf and why he should be cut for the 5 months now, ever since the first super smash bros trailer
the same "another space animal? oh lets cut him for something better like Mario or Zelda"
or maybe "another landmaster? ohhhh instant clone, lets get rid of him"
or "oh why did he get in except krystal? we need them bobiez" the same S*** gets tiring over 5 months!
I just wish that he gets revealed soon, so I can end this madness
We have this argument everyday here now that Diddy's back, but...Seriously, is overrepresentation more accepted than cutting Sheik now?
You know what they say, the MORE the MERRIER. ~ EggmanSeriously, is overrepresentation more accepted than cutting Sheik now?
Zelda is popular enough to warrant 5 characters? Right?But mah overrepresentation?
Not that I care but...
Seriously, is overrepresentation more accepted than cutting Sheik now?
I don't feel that having 6 Zelda Reps is overrepping if we got 6 Pokemon Reps in Brawl and 5 Zelda Reps. I'm all for as little cuts as possible. Just as long as we don't get characters that make little sense in terms of being integral. Sheik hasn't really been relevant as much, yes, but everyone and his brother knows what Ocarina of Time is and that's how most people recall Zelda as, with Sheik attached.But mah overrepresentation?
Not that I care but...
Seriously, is overrepresentation more accepted than cutting Sheik now?
Zelda is popular enough to warrant 5 characters? Right?![]()
That's like saying Ocarina of Time is the only Zelda game that counts. Seriously, it's overrated. Zelda was huge before Ocarina of Time, and might've gone downwards after it but Skyward Sword marked a whole new direction according to Miyamoto. So I think a character is due now.I don't feel that having 6 Zelda Reps is overrepping if we got 6 Pokemon Reps in Brawl and 5 Zelda Reps. I'm all for as little cuts as possible. Just as long as we don't get characters that make little sense in terms of being integral. Sheik hasn't really been relevant as much, yes, but everyone and his brother knows what Ocarina of Time is and that's how most people recall Zelda as, with Sheik attached.
This implies that we haven't had 5th Mario Reps in the past (Clone or not). We can have it again. There's logical options that don't sound like filler.Yes.
But where's the 5th Mario rep?
Seriously, keeping Sheik and adding Impa would mean 6 Zelda characters.
AGAIN. I am not bothered by this but...
Dr. Mario is a filler if you want want to equate "balance" on the big three.Yes.
But where's the 5th Mario rep?
Seriously, keeping Sheik and adding Impa would mean 6 Zelda characters.
AGAIN. I am not bothered by this but...
Zelda already had more than Mario in Brawl, you know.
![]()
Now it's my turn.
We have this argument everyday here now that Diddy's back, but...
What's a legitimate reason to cut Sheik?
I mean, a character that has been in both Melee and Brawl should basically be considered a shoo in by now.
Yes, it is.Zelda is popular enough to warrant 5 characters? Right?![]()
Oh, great, here we go again...Oh, and when I said: 'I made up my mind'. I actually meant: 'Damn now who do I choose between Tetra and Sheik?'
Actually, this shouldn't be too difficult...![]()
Yes, it is.
The question is why would it be Impa? She's reoccurring, but she's barely got a role in most of the games. Toon Zelda, Tingle, and even Vaati have larger roles. Not to mention she's quite low on the popularity level as well.
She's not likely in the first place, but replacing Sheik won't even be considered.
(Regular) Zelda having a transformation of Tetra. Wut.
Luigi has had games of his own. He was even playable in his first appearance. Comparing Sheik to Luigi just... Can't be done. When Luigi is basically THE character to associate Player 2 with and Sheik is... Teaching you songs.Well, not only that, but she's become quite popular as well. Might as well be asking to remove Luigi. I believe Sheik's established herself as a permanent character by this point. Also, I don't really think "over-representation" is a thing... It's Zelda for Miyamoto's sake. It kinda deserves it. As well as Super Mario and Pokemon. The most popular and recognizable franchises receiving the most reps seems logical enough, imo.
The role Impa has literally is to connect Link with Zelda. (Source: "The old female storyteller who feeds information to Zelda is named Impa; her name comes from the word impart." (Hyrule Historia (Dark Horse Books), pg. 2-3) )Yes, it is.
The question is why would it be Impa? She's reoccurring, but she's barely got a role in most of the games. Toon Zelda, Tingle, and even Vaati have larger roles. Not to mention she's quite low on the popularity level as well.
She's not likely in the first place, but replacing Sheik won't even be considered.
But "durr big 3 franchise equality".Again, don't really see why Mario needs another newcomer. I mean the series is already *****d to death, so let's look into something else.
If there was one Mother newcomer planned, it would be Porky. The filler character if Porky does not make it would be Ninten.Ok, New topic, um...
Mother?
Because Mario is Nintendo's biggest franchise.Again, don't really see why Mario needs another newcomer. I mean the series is already *****d to death, so let's look into something else.
USURPER KING CHANDELURE.Hey guys, I'm the new owner of the Bandana Dee thread!!!
I made modifications in the OP and I create a poll.
So if you want to check it... Well,that would be cool XD
This. However, I'm not sure Porky would be considered first... =(If there was one Mother newcomer planned, it would be Porky. The filler character if Porky does not make it would be Ninten.
It should only move up if there is a strong choice available, not increase the number just for the sake of increasing numbers.Because Mario is Nintendo's biggest franchise.
I mean, it doesn't need it in Smash 4, but as other franchises, especially Pokémon and Zelda, increase in representation, Mario should move up as well.
Because technically, different symbol = different franchise, so as of now Mario only has 4 characters.
First one is a 50/50, either him or Dixie, second one is a miracle, and I'd love to see him in.I just wanna see Paper Mario folding himself into a paper plane in the Galaxy stage because it would look hilarious as ****.
Also, King K.Rool and Anthony Higgs.
Bowser looks like he ate something sour, Yoshi looks like someone is fondling him from behind, Dedede looks absolutely defeated, the entire FE lineup looks ****ing pissed, Pac-Man looks almost human, Mewtwo looks like stranger-danger child kidnaper, and Ms. Fit bears a passing resemblance to a certain white-faced depressed teenager found in Kakariko Village.You should take inspiration from me and draw them yourself on Paint, like this masterpiece here.
![]()
MOTHER will and should stay Lucas and Ness.Ok, New topic, um...
Mother?
The times where uniqueness and (sometimes) distinctiveness become key factors.It should only move up if there is a strong choice available, not increase the number just for the sake of increasing numbers.
I think that is a massive misconception people are making. We do play as characters you know, and if all of the best choices are already available, there isn't a reason to force anything onto us if it's just small potatoes. Don't care that Super Mario Bros. is one of the biggest franchises Nintendo has, that doesn't mean we're forced to stomach the likes of Waluigi or Daisy just for the sake of expanding something that doesn't need expanding.
If you ever feel as though Mario isn't sufficiently "repped," go look at how many stages, items, songs, trophies, and stickers it has in comparison to other high-selling series, then come back and see if you feel as strongly that it's a horrible injustice if it doesn't have just one more character.
Times to post: 2