Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Got me confused as well. I haven't heard many stupid arguments lately so I forgot that he was around and that I had him on ignore.
I'd much rather have Mega Man than Sonic, personally. Third parties rotating makes sense, and while Sonic was hardly your average Smash character, if such a thing exists, Mega Man looks to be even more unique.
The posters have legitimate clout, but they themselves said that they could not verify the legitimacy of their source. So their clout is rather immaterial here. Indeed, somebody could be attempting to appropriate their clout for purposes of legitimizing some trolling.
Right, but the rumor specified that they would be revealed at E3. All are of course still likely inclusions. The rumor got the timetable completely wrong; why would an insider divulging accurate information deliberately leak the wrong reveal order? It's possible, but we need to ask these questions.
Mega Man's not even a factor; he was a super obvious inclusion. WFT is indeed an anomaly, and I am not arguing that a guess is the more likely option, simply that she could have been guessed due to the sheer amount of players in the fanbase and that we need to treat this rumor as false until proven correct given that its prediction did not come true.
That's the point.
There certainly would be. Wii Fit is massively popular, has a sequel in the works, and Sakurai has a history of WTF picks. Once again, I'll say that several posters on here have indicated that they expected Wii Fit to appear in SSB4 in some manner prior to the reveal.
All I can say is.....yeah, it kinda DOES. did you read my post and the quote in it from Masihiro Sakurai? "Just because the game is being cooperatively developed with Namco Bandai involved, that doesn’t at all mean that they’d be given any special consideration for having characters in the game,"-Masahiro Sakurai. In fact that's pretty much what I said when I first joined this sight. Now Sakurai has confirmed what I told you all several times before. when you said "Sakurai never dismissed a Namco rep but just said they won't be given special treatment." you just straight up lied. Not to mention: Why would he say that if he was ever planning on putting them in the game or thought he ever would. He has had plenty of time to consider that and never did. If after this you still think Pac-Man could be in the game (as if it wasn't already kinda silly.) no offense, but that's kind of like denial. I mean I know you guys want him in the game, but just because you want someone doesn't mean they are gonna be in it. I'm not trying to shove stuff in your face or like stomp on your faith or anything, but come on. It's all kind of wrapped up already. He's not gonna be in it. He never was gonna be in it. There isn't really anything else to say otherwise than to just pretend what Sakurai said so clearly doesn't mean anything. Even I admit when a character is unlikely, but this?
So I prove why Pac-Man is NOT a possibility and your comeback is "You're dumb." Why? I'm dumb because I proved something that you don't want to accept. This is what I'm talking about guys. Why don't you post WHY my statement was dumb. Why don't you post something that proves my statement wrong. Thus, proving that I am "dumb". Or is that your closing statement about this wrapped up case?
Talking to Noah?
Wow, I guess twisting the developers words around, and just downright doing anything to convince yourself that a character will get in just because you want it is another way to prove the possibility of said character..........................oh, wait no it isn't.
If Noah keeps it up, he won't have anyone to even talk to on this discussion. I think at least half of us basically ignore him right? Maybe one of these days he will have a good point, but we won't see it. lol
Indeed.If Noah keeps it up, he won't have anyone to even talk to on this discussion. I think at least half of us basically ignore him right? Maybe one of these days he will have a good point, but we won't see it. lol
1.I would HATE the inclusion of Pac-man in the game. 2. You're kind of dumb for interpreting sakurais quotes as such. 3. You're dumb for believing you PROVED pac-man is deconfirmed 4.its one thing to believe that he won't be included which is fine, but to not realize if you don't want to give a hint of a character being in a game and you are specifically asked a question pertaining to that character basically(as pacman would be the most obvious choice if namco were to get a rep)' If you suggested or even hinted at the fact namco was getting a character pretty much everyone would expect pac-man would be in so his reveal at a later time wouldnt be very surprising, you would say pretty much what you would need to to have people skeptical about his conclusion without actually saying he won't be in the game. Even if pac-man was not planned to be included in the game, Sakurai asking the jnterviewer what namco character he'd like to see clearly suggests that if they hadn't planned in including him they'd be open to ideas
I still don't see where you get: Pac-Man = Zero possibility. Sakurai is stating that including a Namco character in the game won't be based on the fact that they helped develop SSB4 but whether a Namco character deserves to be in Smash Bros. If Sakurai decided to add a Namco character and he feels Pac-Man could add a lot to Smash Bros., then he will add him in. Namco characters inclusion works just as any other third party character inclusion. And I have no ****ing clue if he will be in the game or not...or a namco rep for that matter. No one 100% knows. Personally, I would much rather see a different Namco rep such as Lloyd or Nightmare but that's my own bias. However, I still recognize that Pac-Man does not have a absolute zero chance of being included. The possibility still exists if Sakurai decides he wants to add him in. It is the case of any other 3rd party character, not just Namco. In addition, I can definitely see haters saying "You only added [Namco character] because they helped develop the game." Possibly, Sakurai wanted to indicate to fans that there is a leveled field for choosing characters and he does not play favorites. How you saw "Pac-Man = Zero possibility" from that article is beyond me. I am not saying that Pac-Man is 100% guaranteed or even has a above average possibility - I am just stating that Pac-Man is possible regardless of that article as with any namco character or 3rd party character.
Like how you admitted that Ninten and Lyndis is unlikely? And no, you aren't shoving it in people's faces. You are just being a pretentious douche that believes himself to be 100% correct every time; all the time when in fact you are not. You are a waste of my time to argue/debate with.
Good idea. I thought it was entertaining after a while but, yeah, it's like arguing with an annoying brick wall.
Good analogy.
Nothing resident evil will be in this game. It's too dark and isn't prominent enough to nintendos history. Also isnt resident evil made by capcom? Cuz capcom already has megaman.
Capcom isn't helping with the game. So no they don't have a chance.