KingofPhantoms
The Spook Factor
NO WAI, HE'S SO IRRELEVANT AND NOT-RECENT, DEDENEE IS MORERECENTRELEVANT AND MUH FAIRY TYPE!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
NO WAI, HE'S SO IRRELEVANT AND NOT-RECENT, DEDENEE IS MORERECENTRELEVANT AND MUH FAIRY TYPE!
Um...wrong thread?Who here is actually pretty good at brawl? I mean like Apex worthy good...
Well, was that when you cancelled your patient-doctor relationship with Dr. Mario=???My prescription of Smashchu ran out back in 2011, I don't plan on getting refills.
Totally false... just like the "Smash Wii U is a launch title" rumor. The earliest we'll get either game in Q4 2014, and at the latest, Q3/4 2015.
oh geezUm...wrong thread?
Brawl isn't the only game at APEX. There will also be Melee, Street Fighter IV (I think), Marvel vs. Capcom 3 (I think), Project M, and Smash 64.Who here is actually pretty good at brawl? I mean like Apex worthy good...
Well that's like saying I dust people in MW2 on 360, but can't beat beat people in Black Ops on 360. Different game, different mechanics, etcs...even if COD hasn't changed engines since the 4th gameBrawl isn't the only game at APEX. There will also be Melee, Street Fighter IV (I think), Marvel vs. Capcom 3 (I think), Project M, and Smash 64.
But to answer your question, nope, that's not me... but I've smoked Apex worthy Brawl players in Project M and Melee.
I'm sure John could be good at brawl if he liked it, its just not his style tho.Well that's like saying I dust people in MW2 on 360, but can't beat beat people in Black Ops on 360. Different game, different mechanics, etcs...even if COD hasn't changed engines since the 4th game
I've never played competitively in Melee, but I really wanna play someone tourney-worthy. I beat one kid in high school who placed in tournies before, so who knows. Real men use Peach.
On topic, is anyone expecting a noteworthy update in the next couple hours?
I have doubts we'll be seeing anything significant tonight. When we get a character reveal we usually see at least a few more pics of them following that character's reveal for a very short time, but the same doesn't seem to apply to stages, or items for that matter. The X-bomb has only been shown once so far, though, considering how we didn't get a playable Pokemon character reveal there is the possibility that we'll see some more news regarding the Pokeball item tonight to make up for it, but I'm not certain.On topic, is anyone expecting a noteworthy update in the next couple hours?
Oh I mean nothing rude, I'm just saying it's unfair to say, "oh I whip good Brawl players at <insert game that isn't Brawl here>."I'm sure John could be good at brawl if he liked it, its just not his style tho.
Actually real men always have a pocket falcon, but that's another story for another day.
As for the OT: Not really just another toon link pic.
I was pretty good at Brawl back in the day. I use to routinely beat people who now or were formerly top ranked players...I'm sure John could be good at brawl if he liked it, its just not his style tho.
...I actually have a pocket Captain Falcon in Smash 64, Melee, (Brawl,) and Project M!Actually real men always have a pocket falcon, but that's another story for another day.
Yeah that's why i don't do competitive brawl much anymore, (minimal at best). I'm focusing mostly on 64, but i put my time on all versions as wellMy post wasn't a jab at Brawl players, only that their skillset isn't usually as well-rounded. They don't know as much as Smash 64 or Melee players about how to face someone who is aggressive and successful at it, how to edge guard, or really how to deal with combos offensively or defensively.
However, they do know how to poke really well, and how to force the opponent to approach.
I was pretty good at Brawl back in the day. I use to routinely beat people who now or were formerly top ranked players...
...but then everything got so camping, stalling, and "tag, you're it" and poking-based, and I refused to adapt (I want ACTION!) that I stopped winning.
Yep, that's right. I quit playing competitively for a causal reason, more specifically not wanting to be boring, wanting to have fun playing [competitive] games), and not wanting to switch from a character they like (Toon Link) to one that bores them (Meta Knight). Strange, right=??? #CompetitivePlayersAreCasualToo
That's why I dropped Brawl, and focused more on Smash 64 and Melee, and eventually picked up Project M.
...I actually have a pocket Captain Falcon in Smash 64, Melee, (Brawl,) and Project M!
Oh, and my claim to fame with Captain Falcon: I once Falcon Punched Mango (even though I did get 4 stocked) in the one time I faced him. It was mad hype!
Yaaaarg why must people misunderstand my posts. I never said you took a jab at them anywhere. All I said is using the statement, "I can beat players who are good at game X, at Game Y & Z" is moot. That's all. No ill begotten remarks or thoughts, just a comment.My post wasn't a jab at Brawl players, only that their skillset isn't usually as well-rounded. They don't know as much as Smash 64 or Melee players about how to face someone who is aggressive and successful at it, how to edge guard, or really how to deal with combos offensively or defensively.
However, they do know how to poke really well, and how to force the opponent to approach.
I'm talking Melee. And only scum main Kirby in Smash 64....such as myself haha. However I feel inclined to use Jiggs more because she's just a worse Kirby, so I don't feel as bad sine I can't spike, but can only walk on faces repeatedly.Yeah that's why i don't do competitive brawl much anymore, (minimal at best). I'm focusing mostly on 64, but i put my time on all versions as well
and no real men main kirby
Yeah, I got camped out by a ROB in an 11 minute 3 stock match in a tournament once, and I was pissed after the match.Yeah that's why i don't do competitive brawl much anymore, (minimal at best). I'm focusing mostly on 64, but i put my time on all versions as well
and no real men main kirby
I'm talking melee as well dude, i only go secondary marth for tier reasons.Yaaaarg why must people misunderstand my posts. I never said you took a jab at them anywhere. All I said is using the statement, "I can beat players who are good at game X, at Game Y & Z" is moot. That's all. No ill begotten remarks or thoughts, just a comment.
I'm talking Melee. And only scum main Kirby in Smash 64....such as myself haha. However I feel inclined to use Jiggs more because she's just a worse Kirby, so I don't feel as bad sine I can't spike, but can only walk on faces repeatedly.
Blame the site.Double post (I'm going to bed, my brain isn't working)
Well Project M is very Brawlsy in a lot of ways, and since the techniques are very easy to pull off in Project M generally (especially with the Brawl characters a lot of Brawl players play), it's not much of a transition for them as some make it out to be. I've found the same thing to be true with Brawl Plus and Brawl Minus.Yaaaarg why must people misunderstand my posts. I never said you took a jab at them anywhere. All I said is using the statement, "I can beat players who are good at game X, at Game Y & Z" is moot. That's all. No ill begotten remarks or thoughts, just a comment.
Ridley.Blame the site.
Well Project M is very Brawlsy in a lot of ways, and since the techniques are very easy to pull off in Project M generally (especially with the Brawl characters a lot of Brawl players play), it's not much of a transition for them as some make it out to be. I've found the same thing to be true with Brawl Plus and Brawl Minus.
I'm just pointing out that although they have great strategic skill at Brawl, their technical skill and total game refinement tends to be rather poor compared to Smash 64 or Melee players much lower on the totem pole of those games competitively, sans for most of the tip top players.
Brawl's lack of speed and hard to perform technicality that helps is ultimately why they aren't good at those things most of the time. After all, why work on what you don't use=???
In other words, I agree with you... although in a more detailed way!!!
Anyways, going off this tangent to bring the discussion back on topic, I really would wonder what potential newcomer could feel equal parts "Brawlsy" and "Meleesy". The only one I can think off the top of my head are K. Rool, Miis, and Isaac, truthfully.
EddyBearr, king of tl;dr.Just stopping by to say that in my casual browsing, I saw a really really long post. To the author, I just want to tell you that brevity might help you in the long run.
I don't see what makes this appeasing to Smash Fans.Cult Appeasing Roster.
Casual/party/family appeasing roster.
Explanations at bottom.
Expecting flame.
What? Are you seriously suggesting that Snake staying keeps "srs gamrs" playing smash. Pretty horrible reason to bring Snake back. That's like saying we should add characters from casual games so we can have casuals play the game.Snake stays: We don't need any more 3rd party, even if Namco is developing. Snake staying helps keep some "more serious" gamers interested in the game.
I spoke far too soon obviously.Waluigi & Baby Bowser: Casual Party-Players love both Waluigi and Bowser Jr. To them, they think "Why are they both in Mario Kart, but not Smash Bros?" I'm sure there are some kids out there who go through random Waluigi phases, and I know that Bowser Jr. is a hardcore casual favorite, so both should be in. Toad is left out, as casuals might say: Toad can't fight!|
I'm sorry, but I'm sure he called the crazy good tournament players "Maniacs". Not people who play the game a bit more seriously than those who just pick it up and play. If he isn't aiming to please the consumers who bought the previous products, then he shouldn't be calling this game "Super Smash Brothers". We're buying the game, he's going to need to please us if he wants our money.Mii: Every little kid wants to be a part of their favorite game, and little kids play Smash. It means little to us more serious gamers, but Sakurai has explicitly said he isn't aiming to please us, even going as far as to call us "maniacs."
???Tetra: Bolder guess & personal preference. I think she's the most likely Zelda Newcomer, and I think a Zelda Newcomer is more likely than, say, Shulk.
Quotes = Casual love, eh? Where's Reggie then?No Chrom: Conflicting niche with Marth and Ike. Ike fights for his friends. Quotes = casual love.
So for the third Fire Emblem rep you avoided the casual opinion in Chrom and went with the arguably more hardcore decision of Anna. This fits in with your roster very well.Anna: FE warrants a third rep, and Anna fills a niche that finishes off the "FE sword users." She's small/light/fast/flexible/etc.
Assuming that casuals today even know that Star Fox exists out of Smash Brothers. Is Krystal normally a good choice, yeah. But in this circumstance she's a pretty dumb one.Krystal: For the casual girls. They exist, there are many of them, and many of them love Krystal. Krystal not being playable was something many of htem hated.
>Implying that adding Shulk wouldn't suffice those exact same things.Isaac>Shulk: Popularity, potential, uniqueness, and semi-cult appeasement.
You say you want to appease cults as well, but you cut the main character from the biggest video game cult franchise ever.No Ness: Super bold, but I think one will get cut. Ness has veteran status, while Lucas is more recent/etc. Most casuals I've talked to think Lucas is cooler.
No R.O.B.: R.O.B. sucksssss. Nobody likes R.O.B.
Oh yes, because we need the money from the furries. I mean it's not like Wolf has any real significance in the franchise or anything.No Wolf: I think the Space Animal fans can take the hit. Krystal would probably be a better character in if we're trying to increase revenue and please customers. Star Fox shouldn't even have 3 reps at this point, but I feel it will retain all 3.
Don't want to confuse the casual base now do we? Although, I don't know of any casual Metroid fans. So I don't really know who is really getting hurt if Ridley did make it in as a playable character.No Ridley: He's a boss. Casuals know him as a Brawl Boss.
"Sorry Ridley fans, buy a Wii U! It needs more sales anyways [Laughs]."Appeasing Ridley cult: "Boss Mode" has an option where the user with the Wii U Gamepad can play as the bosses, so you can play as Ridley.
Jesus, is that how people use R.O.B. competitively? That doesn't even sound like fun for the R.O.B. player either.Yeah, I got camped out by a ROB in an 11 minute 3 stock match in a tournament once, and I was pissed after the match.
The worst part is I had 2 stocks left and he had 1, and I went for the kill recklessly for the last 3 minutes. I went from nearly having a JV4 stock to barely winning because I got tired of countering his totally stalling, camping, and running away tactics with kinda sorta camping tactics.
Then I lost the next two matches (the last 1 getting timed out), and I thought then and there "this is the last time I play this game competitively." I then went to the Melee tournament, watched people play, and did a few friendlies there.
Why did they want Marth, Captain Falcon, Mewtwo and Ness removed?For some reason people have wanted Ness gone ever since his debut dating all the way back in 1999. In fact, I'm getting flashbacks to pre-Brawl where a lot of people wanted half of the roster gone, including the proposition of scrapping Marth, Roy, Captain Falcon, Ness, Ice Climbers, Mr. Game & Watch, Mewtwo etc.
I think most of the unlockable characters would be veterans.Hey, I have an interesting topic.
In Brawl, we saw 9 (10 if you count Zero Suit Samus) newcomers on the starting roster. We previously had 4 or 5 (Sheik) on the Melee starting roster. I can't speak for everyone, but I was a bit disappointed, as the majority of the newcomers were revealed so early, with only a handful of the newcomers were hidden. Even two of the hidden newcomers, Snake and Sonic, were shown off early.
My question is, do you think Sakurai will try to mend this, keeping most of the newcomers hidden and not showed off until release, or do you think it will be the same as Brawl?
Agree with this sentiment, so I'll just nod my head.Agreed. I see K. Rool as all but guaranteed, while Dixie Kong is IMO a bit under 50/50.
Dixie could easily be Smash 4's Wolf (late-ish add kinda sorta but not really), albeit I see her specials being more unique.
Especially since he was in Fire Emblem: Awakening, he's one of the only 2 Fire Emblem characters to star in 2 or more games (the other obviously being Marth), and he's one of the most popular Brawl characters.
Wait you----"Toad can't fight"
Tell them to go **** themselves.Casual (including Core) gamers outnumber hardcore gamers by a huge margin.
Um....... NoTell them to go **** themselves.
You lost to a campy character with using Toon Link, who can be just as campy? I mean toon link has more projectiles to spam at him and you have the hook shot, so if you space him out while using your specials and zair the match up shouldn't be so bad for your character. I think all of toon links specials and his zair can stop ROB's gyro, even just simply blocking it and the laser.Yeah, I got camped out by a ROB in an 11 minute 3 stock match in a tournament once, and I was pissed after the match.
The worst part is I had 2 stocks left and he had 1, and I went for the kill recklessly for the last 3 minutes. I went from nearly having a JV4 stock to barely winning because I got tired of countering his totally stalling, camping, and running away tactics with kinda sorta camping tactics.
Then I lost the next two matches (the last 1 getting timed out), and I thought then and there "this is the last time I play this game competitively." I then went to the Melee tournament, watched people play, and did a few friendlies there.
And eh, I actually have a pocket Kirby in Smash 64 and I had one in Brawl. I used to have a pocket Kirby back in Melee, back when I was turrible!
I imagine the faces of these hypothetical casuals when they discovered Princess Peach of all people turned out to be a fighter.Wait you----
I bet those filthy casuals are more shocked by Zelda.... "wait, Zelda is a separate character from the boy in green tights?!"I imagine the faces of these hypothetical casuals when they discovered Princess Peach of all people turned out to be a fighter.
They must of **** themselves inside-out in shock.
I.... actually wouldn't mind if Sakurai turned the tables compared to Brawl and made an X/Y pokemon a boss character while an Black/White Pokemon a playable character. (Assuming of course we get a Pokemon newcomer) Which I actually wouldn't mind really.I don't think Sakurai was really trolling the Pokemon fanbase since he never had plans for a Pokemon character reveal to coincide with X & Y. He even said so when he showed that picture with Pikachu and Xerneas last Friday. It is even possible that Sakurai has no plans for a playable Pokemon from X & Y... Sakurai started development for SSB4 back in March or April 2012 and Pokemon X & Y wasn't even announced till January 2013. Sakurai must have already decided on the SSB4 roster before that Pokemon announcement. So, it is possible that we might get a playable Pokemon from Black & White (maybe Zoroark) while most of the Pokeball Pokemon may be from X & Y and Black & White with a few returning Pokeball Pokemon from Brawl (Meowth, Snorlax, Goldeen, etc.)