PsychoIncarnate
The Eternal Will of the Swarm
[quote="Moon Monkey, post: 15414043, member: 50800"
This however was a classic
[/quote]
How does it compare to:
This however was a classic
How does it compare to:
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
They are both good... They both give me that late 80's early 90's vibe.
Edited for the truth.Everyone likes everyone, and they all have crappy taste.
Sassy *****.Edited for the truth.
Falkoopa: You gotta be a man.
With the force of a great typhoon.And he has to be as swift as a coursing river.
which can level megacities in one go.With the force of a great typhoon.
With all the strength as a raging fire.With the force of a great typhoon.
And mysterious as the dark side of, the mooooooooo~~n!With all the strength as a raging fire.
I agree Nintendo needs to sell Wii Us, but that has nothing to do with Smash Bros.@ Falkoopa - I want Smash to eventually go in the direction of a multi-party crossover fighting title. It could be so much more bigger of a series then it is even know.
Also Nintendo DOES NEED THE SALES. Wii U is struggling right now as is the company. If you do not see that then you are just a blind homer. Nintendo with the Wii U is almost as bad as Sega with the Saturn with regard to losses and sales. 3DS is bailing them a little.
@ N3ON - I would still say on the meter of general noticeability that Pac-Man is still higher then most the characters below him. If you were to go to the general store/grocery store of your town with a picture of Pac-Man and a picture of Samus, I would say more people would know Pac-Man than Samus. Also disagree on Cloud vs. Sonic using the same argument. Heck, Sonic even has an actual gene named after him and Dr. Robotnik by the Scientific Community. He is in the video game walk of fame and is was arguable in the 1990s more well-known then Mario and Mickey Mouse based on polls done. Also Sonic and Pikachu were both the first video game characters to have their own balloons in the Macy Thanksgiving Parade. Not to mention Sega is trying to set Sonic up to be the next "Hello Kitty" marketing wise in Japan.
I mean I still want the vast majority of the roster to still be Nintendo but if I was approached by 3rd parties or they were willing to work with me on Smash, I would put their characters in if I was Sakurai and also push their characters in Smash so that those 3rd parties would develop games for the Wii U using those characters. I would try to help Nintendo generally in that manner.
With Sakurai at the helm, that's not a direction Smash will go in.@ Falkoopa - I want Smash to eventually go in the direction of a multi-party crossover fighting title. It could be so much more bigger of a series then it is even know.
The characters that will cause the most sales are already in the game. They don't need any 3rd parties, Nintendo's characters and the Smash brand name could do fine on their own.Also Nintendo DOES NEED THE SALES. Wii U is struggling right now as is the company. If you do not see that then you are just a blind homer. Nintendo with the Wii U is almost as bad as Sega with the Saturn with regard to losses and sales. 3DS is bailing them a little.
Again, awareness of a character doesn't necessarily translate to hype or popularity for Smash. A lot of people know who Pac-Man is, but not many of them actually care if he shows up in Smash. The characters that are most requested/popular cause the biggest amount of hype. Pac-Man is not only outclassed in that regard by a number of 3rd parties, but also by many Nintendo characters, as this is Smash Bros, not overall awareness of video game characters.@ N3ON - I would still say on the meter of general noticeability that Pac-Man is still higher then most the characters below him. If you were to go to the general store/grocery store of your town with a picture of Pac-Man and a picture of Samus, I would say more people would know Pac-Man than Samus. Also disagree on Cloud vs. Sonic using the same argument. Heck, Sonic even has an actual gene named after him and Dr. Robotnik by the Scientific Community. He is in the video game walk of fame and is was arguable in the 1990s more well-known then Mario and Mickey Mouse based on polls done. Also Sonic and Pikachu were both the first video game characters to have their own balloons in the Macy Thanksgiving Parade. Not to mention Sega is trying to set Sonic up to be the next "Hello Kitty" marketing wise in Japan.
We'd all make at least one decision different than Sakurai has/will, but it ultimately comes down to his mentality, which is that 3rd parties are to be used sparingly.I mean I still want the vast majority of the roster to still be Nintendo but if I was approached by 3rd parties or they were willing to work with me on Smash, I would put their characters in if I was Sakurai and also push their characters in Smash so that those 3rd parties would develop games for the Wii U using those characters. I would try to help Nintendo generally in that manner.
Least you guys got the Rainfall games months before we did. Or in Pandora's Tower's case, a whole damn year.Awakening could use coming faster to the European game shelves now...
Fair enough, how about Mrs. Pac-Man?Alright well then give us Jin or Kazuya or even a Tales character or literally anybody else, I don't want Pac-Man.
Something I want to note here. I find it interesting how Pac-Man supporters constantly bring up his iconic status, yet if it was such a big plus towards his inclusion, why didn't Sakurai bother to make room to include Pac-Man in Brawl (either by including him over Sonic or making Pac-Man the 3rd third-party addition)? Clearly his iconic status should have been enough to add him then, but somehow it wasn't.volbound1000 said:Pac-Man is iconically almost as big as Mario. Look at all the references in pop culture. You don't understand because you were probably born long after his heyday but he was the image of video game throughout the 1980s and is still very often reference in pop-culture.
Roy is the definition of "no-name" characters pre-Melee and yet he got in. Other characters that are relatively obscure are Ness & Lucas (in the West), Marth (in the West), Ike, Ice Climbers and Mr. Game & Watch. Sakurai doesn't care too much if a character isn't all that well-known, only if they would make good additions. Clearly, Sakurai thought said "no-names" were worthy of playable status.Volbound1000 said:I am trying to defend the casual Smash fanbase which makes up 80-90% of the people that would buy it and most of them, as I do, would prefer characters like Pac-Man over characters from games that are so obscure no one has ever heard of them.
Now if Nintendo wanted to beef up the Mario, Zelda, Pokemon, Donkey Kong, Kirby rosters with big names from those series, that would be better IMO then added a bunch of no-names.
I would not buy the game if both were in. Thank god Sakurai has extremely high standards for characters.Oasis_S said:Time to start adding Goku and Spider-Man.
How many times do we have to say that we do not need third-parties in Smash? Sakurai himself has no qualms with getting rid of them entirely if he wants to because third-parties are meant to be treated as a special treat for the fans. Along with Sakurai reminiscing about the third-parties characters sometimes being harder to deal with than the game itself; more reason to minimize third-party additions.volbound1000 said:I am not for dumping the little guys or adding 10 3rd parties but my point is that we need at least 2 big-name third parties IMO. A la Megaman and Pac-man. Cloud would be nice as N3ON pointed out and is a big add for the future.
There just isn't much left from the Nintendo roster. Little Mac, Mewtwo (a re-add), Ridley, King K Rool, and a Golden Sun character would be nice. Getting a Xenoblade rep would also be helpful because it seems to be an up and coming series. The rest is pretty much digging from the barrell. Nintendo is better off getting big name 3rd parties or beefing up their big series.
Pacman would make a great stage. If sakurai chooses to include him in any way I'm willing to bet it will be the classic arcade level.@N3ON - Perhaps to Gamers it would be huger to get Cloud but to Casuals (who are the reason Wii outsold Xbox and PS3) Pac-Man is a bigger deal because most haven't played Final Fantasy.
Cloud is huge, in fact most people I talked about had him in their top 5 to add to Smash (apparently forgetting the fact he was not on Nintendo system). Now to be fair out of the 5, only 3 had Smash Brothers while the other two bumped over the other systems (one didn't even own a Nintendo system).
As I mention, I support Pac-Man more because I grew up in the 90s and remember the 80s well. Early 90s still had many of the extensions of the 1980s. It would draw attention if Pac-Man was included and I think he would have a very fun moveset with Sakurai at the helm. In fact, I think Pac-Man will be in the game because chances are Sakurai played Pac-Man as a kid and he has already shown to love the classic games based on past character selections: Ice Climbers, Pit, Mr. Game & Watch, ROB, Pit, etc.
"Once you hit your Four Seal, you are sure to wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin~"We must be tranquil as a forest, but on fire within'