• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Roster Discussion Thread (Closed)

Status
Not open for further replies.

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey
Still, what exactly would Tingle even do in the context of a fighting game?

I mean in detail to form a play style, not simply saying "he can do x and y". You got to string together attributes together instead of focusing on one in order to flesh out a character.
 

Big-Cat

Challenge accepted.
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
16,176
Location
Lousiana
NNID
KumaOso
3DS FC
1590-4853-0104
I don't really care for KOS-MOS. Who is she? Would the average gamer know who she is? She looks like a generic anime girl from a sci-fi anime.
We might as well ask what IS the average gamer. Chances are the average gamer is closer to the COD-Halo crowd who have probably not heard of 90% of the Smash Bros. cast.
 

Second Power

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
719
3DS FC
0774-5502-4430
I agree Tingle isn't important in the Zelda series. That's why we suggest Tingle gets his own icon, maybe a rupee, to emphasize that Tingle is representing his own series since he is, after all, important there. :troll:
Does the Tingle series really need a rep? There are other smaller series that could get reps, like Fossil Fighters or the Rolling Western (if it qualifies as a series, as The Last Ranger is only speculated). And neither of those has a hatedom.
 

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey
Chances are the average gamer is closer to the COD-Halo crowd who have probably not heard of 90% of the Smash Bros. cast.
Actually the average gamer is the COD-Halo crowd who have probably not heard of 90% of the Smash Bros. cast and don't even bother to give a crap since they think Nintendo is casual baby garbage, with the irony of them not even being past puberty.

Alternatively, the children that play Angry Birds on their phones or the middle age men that buy every NFL rehash.
 

Big-Cat

Challenge accepted.
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
16,176
Location
Lousiana
NNID
KumaOso
3DS FC
1590-4853-0104
So in other words, being obscure means nothing if you put things at mainstream level. You'd be lucky to find people that know that Samus is a girl or that "Zelda" is actually Link.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
We might as well ask what IS the average gamer. Chances are the average gamer is closer to the COD-Halo crowd who have probably not heard of 90% of the Smash Bros. cast.
So in other words, being obscure means nothing if you put things at mainstream level. You'd be lucky to find people that know that Samus is a girl or that "Zelda" is actually Link.
Agreed, also the argument that KOS-MOS is a generic anime girl is pretty lame.

I mean really, if people really think that, they've probably watched like... 2 anime, ever
Naruto and Inuyasha
.

Generic would be more like that one chick from Toradora, or Chidori from Full Metal Panic, or that one girl from Inuyasha.

Even if we compare her to Major Kusanagi from GitS, there is still a lot of difference.

Anyway, my vouch for KOS-MOS isn't because of her character, but rather because of her abilities, I haven't even played Xenosaga yet, so I don't know the details of her characterization.
 

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey
You'd be lucky to find people that know that Samus is a girl or that "Zelda" is actually Link.
Don't even ****ing remind me of this. Trying to explain stuff like this should not be that hard for anyone with a brain, but it is. I mean, it should not be that hard to figure out that Pit is not "Kid Icarus" (That misconception is even referenced in Kid Icarus: Uprising), Marth and Ike are not brothers, Sonic and Snake are not Nintendo characters, explaining stuff like Captain Falcon and R.O.B., and whatever else pops up.

I'd say that ignorance is pretty much the culprit behind that in general, which bothers me a lot every time it pops up.
 

Scoliosis Jones

Kept you waiting, huh?
Writing Team
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
9,582
Location
Buffalo, New York
NNID
ScoliosisxJones
3DS FC
1762-3194-1826
Most of the time, I'd like to think the Mario characters (including Yoshi, Dk, Diddy, Wario), most of the Pokemon characters, and Sonic are the most iconic characters to a person who has never played a Nintendo game or is just unfamiliar with it.

Obscure characters, would likely be most retros, Fire Emblem, Mother, F-Zero, maybe Star Fox. Zelda CAN be obscure, but I don't think that game is as bad as others. (this is for people who haven't really played too many games btw)
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Don't even ****ing remind me of this. Trying to explain stuff like this should not be that hard for anyone with a brain, but it is. I mean, it should not be that hard to figure out that Pit is not "Kid Icarus" (That misconception is even referenced in Kid Icarus: Uprising), Marth and Ike are not brothers, Sonic and Snake are not Nintendo characters, explaining stuff like Captain Falcon and R.O.B., and whatever else pops up.

I'd say that ignorance is pretty much the culprit behind that in general, which bothers me a lot every time it pops up.
Video related?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZK509PQuEg

Very much so...
 

ChronoBound

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
8,998
I know some brodudes. They are casual gamers, and I actually was curious to see what Brawl characters they actually recognized. These are people who started with the Super Nintendo/Sega Genesis and Nintendo 64/PlayStation, so the sample size may be different from what would happen with those who started gaming in with PS2/GCN/XBOX:

Sample one recognized: 23/39
Mario
Luigi
Bowser
Peach
Donkey Kong
Diddy Kong
Link
Zelda
Ganondorf
Samus
Yoshi
Kirby
Fox
Falco
Wolf
Pikachu
Jigglypuff
Squirtle
Ivysaur
Charizard
Wario
Olimar
Sonic

Sample 2: 23/39
Mario
Luigi
Bowser
Peach
Donkey Kong
Diddy Kong
Link
Zelda
Ganondorf
Toon Link
Samus
Yoshi
Kirby
Meta Knight
King Dedede
Fox
Pikachu
Jigglypuff
Squirtle
Ivysaur
Charizard
Wario
Sonic

Sample 3: 20/39
Mario
Luigi
Bowser
Peach
Donkey Kong
Diddy Kong
Link
Zelda
Ganondorf
Samus
Yoshi
Kirby
Fox
Pikachu
Jigglypuff
Squirtle
Ivysaur
Charizard
Wario
Sonic

Most casual players probably know who Mario, Luigi, Bowser, Peach, Donkey Kong, Link, Yoshi, Kirby, Pikachu, Wario, Sonic, and the original starters of Pokemon.

Of characters requested for Smash 4 the only ones I would say be recognizable to a "casual" gamer would be Toad, Bowser Jr., Waluigi, Mii, and Pac-Man. What's funny is that these casual players knew who Dixie Kong was over K. Rool, despite playing DKC1 and DKC2. Those that played Metroid were able to know who Ridley was though (though one simply called him "that Metroid dragon").
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,454
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
Scoliosis, DK is not a Mario character under any condition. He came before Mario, for cripes' sake. Mario is not in the original DK, the character who inspired him is. Which is called Jumpman. They are not even the same person.

Diddy is a Donkey Kong Series character, and the Mario series spun off from the DK series. Yoshi and Wario did originate from Mario, but are their own full series now too. Wario does not count as a Mario character overall anymore, just related to one. He's a Wario character through and through. Same with Yoshi being solely a Yoshi character. And Kamek is also a Yoshi character. And so is Baby Bowser, notably.

Tingle is now a Tingle-series character, and would not fall straight under being a Zelda character. He's the same category as Wario/Yoshi at the moment, true. But do not lump DK and Diddy as Mario characters when they just plain aren't. Diddy didn't even originate is a Mario game, so that doesn't make sense at all.(I can accept Tingle/Wario/Yoshi being part of a series besides their own, but DK and Diddy? They're Donkey Kong characters first and foremost)

Also, btw, Mario's design originated in the DK series, so technically, they're all DK characters if you apply the whole logic of "originated". Being guests in a series does not make you an actual full character from that series. Unless you think Link and Samus are full Mario characters because they appeared in Super Mario RPG. But we both know that's beyond ludicrous.

...Star Fox is not really obscure in general, save Krystal for some. Fire Emblem is way too well known now. Mother is still fairly obscure, and the Zelda series was never obscure.
 

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey
Notice that Mario stuff is always the biggest culprit. I understand that Mario is a popular franchise and all that, but do these people even realize that there is more to Nintendo then Mario? Even with a crap ton of other games being referenced, does nobody even bother to think about that for a second? Like, nobody bothers to know who the hell that Marth guy is or something?

It's stuff like this that makes me make jokes regarding to Takamaru, like "he's a girl", "he's a ninja", "his name is Murasame", "he's boyfriends with Link", etc.
 

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,557
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
Can someone explain me why frogs are up untill now the hardest enemies to beat in Castlevania 4? Really, got my *** kicked about 4 times by one now. O.o
 

ChronoBound

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
8,998
Notice that Mario stuff is always the biggest culprit. I understand that Mario is a popular franchise and all that, but do these people even realize that there is more to Nintendo then Mario? Even with a crap ton of other games being referenced, does nobody even bother to think about that for a second? Like, nobody bothers to know who the hell that Marth guy is or something?
"Marth's a guy? I thought she was Roy's girlfriend?" :troll:

Link, Pikachu, the original starters for Pokemon, and Sonic are all recognizable to casual players and they are definitely not niche nor have any connection to Mario outside of Smash Bros. (except recently Sonic). There are many who are able to recognize Kirby, Samus, and Fox as well.
 

Swamp Sensei

Today is always the most enjoyable day!
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
39,186
Location
Um....Lost?
NNID
Swampasaur
3DS FC
4141-2776-0914
Switch FC
SW-6476-1588-8392
Like, nobody bothers to know who the hell that Marth guy is or something?

It's stuff like this that makes me make jokes regarding to Takamaru, like "he's a girl", "he's a ninja", "his name is Murasame", "he's boyfriends with Link, etc.
To be fair, most casual gamers would have no idea who Marth or Lucas are. They were Japanese exclusive for quite some time.


I'm not bothered by ignorance. I didn't know all the characters when I got into Smash. Heck I didn't know Zelda, Metroid, F-Zero or Eartbound when the first Smash came out. I can't blame others for that when I was guilty of it myself.

It's when people refuse to learn or even care about a name or character, that ticks me off. How can you play through a Zelda game and still call Link, Zelda? It's like they're brain dead.
 

BKupa666

Barnacled Boss
Moderator
Joined
Aug 12, 2008
Messages
7,788
Location
Toxic Tower
The fact that casual gamers will not be familiar with the vast majority of SSB4's character pool is not necessarily a bad thing, since it will allow the "hardcore fans'" voices to stand out more, since they're the ones who actually know that Takamaru is not Marth's brother, or that Ridley isn't Samus' pet.
 

Big-Cat

Challenge accepted.
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
16,176
Location
Lousiana
NNID
KumaOso
3DS FC
1590-4853-0104
"Marth's a guy? I thought she was Roy's girlfriend?" :troll:

Link, Pikachu, the original starters for Pokemon, and Sonic are all recognizable to casual players and they are definitely not niche nor have any connection to Mario outside of Smash Bros. (except recently Sonic). There are many who are able to recognize Kirby, Samus, and Fox as well.
I think this all really depends on the age gaps. You refer to people who grew up on the 16-bit era. Most of them would probably know most of the characters that debuted before roughly 2000. In fact, out of the three sample groups you posted, the only one to debut after 2000 was Olimar. There were no mentions of the MOTHER or Fire Emblem characters along with Lucario in particular.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Can someone explain me why frogs are up untill now the hardest enemies to beat in Castlevania 4? Really, got my *** kicked about 4 times by one now. O.o
Super Castlevania 4? That game is awesome. Just use the whip in limp and rotate the pad, it works as a good shield. Also, make sure you search walls for meat and stuff.
 

Scoliosis Jones

Kept you waiting, huh?
Writing Team
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
9,582
Location
Buffalo, New York
NNID
ScoliosisxJones
3DS FC
1762-3194-1826
Scoliosis, DK is not a Mario character under any condition. He came before Mario, for cripes' sake. Mario is not in the original DK, the character who inspired him is. Which is called Jumpman. They are not even the same person.

Diddy is a Donkey Kong Series character, and the Mario series spun off from the DK series. Yoshi and Wario did originate from Mario, but are their own full series now too. Wario does not count as a Mario character overall anymore, just related to one. He's a Wario character through and through. Same with Yoshi being solely a Yoshi character. And Kamek is also a Yoshi character. And so is Baby Bowser, notably.

Tingle is now a Tingle-series character, and would not fall straight under being a Zelda character. He's the same category as Wario/Yoshi at the moment, true. But do not lump DK and Diddy as Mario characters when they just plain aren't. Diddy didn't even originate is a Mario game, so that doesn't make sense at all.(I can accept Tingle/Wario/Yoshi being part of a series besides their own, but DK and Diddy? They're Donkey Kong characters first and foremost)

Also, btw, Mario's design originated in the DK series, so technically, they're all DK characters if you apply the whole logic of "originated". Being guests in a series does not make you an actual full character from that series. Unless you think Link and Samus are full Mario characters because they appeared in Super Mario RPG. But we both know that's beyond ludicrous.

...Star Fox is not really obscure in general, save Krystal for some. Fire Emblem is way too well known now. Mother is still fairly obscure, and the Zelda series was never obscure.
True, Mario originated as Jumpman in Donkey Kong, but Mario now has his own series. Donkey Kong and Diddy Kong are a part of their own series, but you cannot deny that they are partially a part of the Mario series also, considering they appear in basically any spin off.

Saying that Link and Samus appeared in MRPG is just trying to make me look stupid. They appeared as CAMEOS. DK and Diddy are PLAYABLE. Huge difference there. DK and Diddy are hardly guests either.

Because someones design is the same means they're from the same series? I didn't realize Donkey Kong in the classic game had a neck tie. Nice argument. /sarcasm. The Donkey Kong in the original isn't even the modern Donkey Kong either.

If you're going to try and prove me wrong, at least come up with a good argument. You pretty much contradict yourself with almost everything you said.

BTW, so if Tingle appears in another Zelda game, it's a guest appearance from the Tingle series? He already appeared in Zelda, therefore he is a Zelda character with his own spin-off. That logic may somewhat work for DK, but not Tingle in any respect.
 

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey
"Marth's a guy? I thought she was Roy's girlfriend?"
Thus, that was the day the fangirls found out that Marth was a guy and decided to make yaoi pictures with Roy. Meanwhile, Caeda and Marth looked up that stuff by accident and got freaked out by it.

Swampasaur said:
It's when people refuse to learn or even care about a name or character, that ticks me off. How can you play through a Zelda game and still call Link, Zelda? It's like they're brain dead.
This is precisely why I get bothered by people when they refuse to listen.
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,454
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
His name is Jumpman, not Mario. Do some research, cause they aren't the same guy and never were. Jumpman =/= Mario. The only thing that's true is that he inspired Mario, but that's it. And even if you think Jumpman is really Mario(kind of hard to believe when only Mario fights the current DK, the grandson of Cranky Kong, who was the original DK), then he must be really really old right now. In addition, that would mean Mario was a Donkey Kong character from the start. That's a little too hard to swallow for me.

Mario is not a DK character. Donkey Kong is not a Mario character. Plain and simple. And exactly how it is. They've been guests and had some games that star eachother together(which wasn't the old DK arcade series) later on, but that's it.

Scolosis Jones said:
True, Mario originated as Jumpman in Donkey Kong, but Mario now has his own series. Donkey Kong and Diddy Kong are a part of their own series, but you cannot deny that they are partially a part of the Mario series also, considering they appear in basically any spin off.
Sure I can. They aren't Mario characters, just guests. They're not a real part of the series. Guests are not the same thing.

Saying that Link and Samus appeared in MRPG is just trying to make me look stupid. They appeared as CAMEOS. DK and Diddy are PLAYABLE. Huge difference there. DK and Diddy are hardly guests either.
No difference to me. They're both Guest appearances from other series. Playable has no meaning when it comes to Guests.

Because someones design is the same means they're from the same series? I didn't realize Donkey Kong in the classic game had a neck tie. Nice argument. /sarcasm. The Donkey Kong in the original isn't even the modern Donkey Kong either.
Wow, you didn't even read, did you? Of course they're not the same one. DK Jr. is the modern DK. But he's a Donkey Kong character and a Guest(just like Link/Samus were in SMRPG) in the Mario series. He doesn't count as a real Mario character. The originated argument only works for Wario/Yoshi for your case, but fails for Kamek too.

If you're going to try and prove me wrong, at least come up with a good argument. You pretty much contradict yourself with almost everything you said.
Like yours? It was a very bad one since you misrepresented what I said pretty badly.

BTW, so if Tingle appears in another Zelda game, it's a guest appearance from the Tingle series? He already appeared in Zelda, therefore he is a Zelda character with his own spin-off. That logic may somewhat work for DK, but not Tingle in any respect.
Only if you don't understand how Guest appearances work. A guest is a character that did not originate in the series but appears none the less. Tingle would not be a guest character. He did originate from Zelda, but he fully reps his own series instead of Zelda alone now. His lack of appearances in the Zelda series does say a lot. FYI, his games aren't Zelda games either. They are Tingle games with the only thing in common being the original character(barely, since he's not similar to his Zelda-series appearances) and Rupees. Spin-offs are their own full series too.(technically, the Mario series is a spin-off of the DK series, but they did evolve to become their own series after a while)
 

Big-Cat

Challenge accepted.
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
16,176
Location
Lousiana
NNID
KumaOso
3DS FC
1590-4853-0104
Here's the thing I want to know on this whole Jumpman thing. Does anyone actually care?
 

ChronoBound

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
8,998
Can someone explain me why frogs are up untill now the hardest enemies to beat in Castlevania 4? Really, got my *** kicked about 4 times by one now. O.o
Super Castlevania IV is probably the easiest of the "action Castlevanias". Personally, its my favorite of the classic Castlevania series. The only other classic Castlevania I really like is Rondo of Blood.
 

Robert of Normandy

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
9,478
Location
Crossbell City
NNID
shinpichu
3DS FC
2251-3915-5139
Switch FC
SW-4957-7233-2307
His name is Jumpman, not Mario.
See my previous post.

Mario IS Jumpman. He was renamed Mario later on, but the playable character in the original DK is in fact Mario.

If you can find me a website or interview that confirms the two are different, then I'll believe you. But I seriously doubt you'll be able to.
 

FlareHabanero

Banned via Warnings
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
16,443
Location
New Jersey
Super Castlevania IV really questioned the purpose of the other items, when the whip pretty much did everything you'd desire. It was definitely fleshed out compared to the clunky controls of the NES day, but everything else remained which caused a bit of a game design hiccup.
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,454
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
See my previous post.

Mario IS Jumpman. He was renamed Mario later on, but the playable character in the original DK is in fact Mario.
I still find that crap hard to swallow, because that makes Mario a Donkey Kong character automatically.(not the other way around) However, it is true, so that means Mario is a DK character officially. Kind of sucks for people not knowing that DK isn't a Mario a character and still saying that blatantly false crap, though.
 

Swamp Sensei

Today is always the most enjoyable day!
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
39,186
Location
Um....Lost?
NNID
Swampasaur
3DS FC
4141-2776-0914
Switch FC
SW-6476-1588-8392
@HyperFalcon

Where is your source for saying Jumpman isn't Mario?
 

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,557
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
DKC is not a Mario spin off game, and Diddy especially doesn't always appear in Mario spin offs.
 

ChronoBound

Smash Hero
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
8,998
DKC is not a Mario spin off game, and Diddy especially doesn't always appear in Mario spin offs.
Diddy Kong has made regular appearances in the Mario spinoffs since Mario Golf: Toadstool Tour. However, aside from Diddy Kong, other DK characters appearing in the Mario spinoffs is really uncommon (pretty much the last Mario spinoff to have DK characters aside from DK and Diddy was Mario Super Sluggers, which was released back in 2008).
 

Robert of Normandy

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
9,478
Location
Crossbell City
NNID
shinpichu
3DS FC
2251-3915-5139
Switch FC
SW-4957-7233-2307
I still find that crap hard to swallow, because that makes Mario a Donkey Kong character automatically.(not the other way around) However, it is true, so that means Mario is a DK character officially. Kind of sucks for people not knowing that DK isn't a Mario a character and still saying that blatantly false crap, though.
I don't think that debuting in Donkey Kong means Mario isn't a DK character. Mario is the face of Nintendo, and Mario has become its own series, so I don't think its fair to say that Mario is a DK character.
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,454
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
I don't think that debuting in Donkey Kong means Mario isn't a DK character. Mario is the face of Nintendo, and Mario has become its own series, so I don't think its fair to say that Mario is a DK character.
Except he still originated as a Donkey Kong character. That's the problem if people think the originating argument is worth anything.

It means Mario is a DK character before being a Mario character. That isn't up for debate, because it's a fact. The rename means nothing. As I said earlier, I was wrong about Jumpman not being Mario(although it most likely is his grandfather realistically, but that's not a big deal here)

If Mario isn't a DK character, then Wario and Yoshi aren't Mario characters. No exceptions to this rule. Being the face of Nintendo has zero effect on this situation. That's irrelevant to whether he's a DK character or not.
 

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,557
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
I actually agree with HyperFalcon.

Also, Mario FIRST appeared in a Donkey Kong game before Diddy came into a Mario game.



Now what did that dude say again? :troll:
 

Robert of Normandy

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
9,478
Location
Crossbell City
NNID
shinpichu
3DS FC
2251-3915-5139
Switch FC
SW-4957-7233-2307
@HyperFalcon
The difference with Yoshi and Wario is that they're still making appearances in Mario games(mostly in spinoffs, but in main series games on occasion as well). Mario hasn't really been a part of the DK series for a while now(the last "DK game" that Mario was in the one on the Gameboy). So it's not just where characters originated that determines from what series a character is from.

Edit: I'd also like to point out that the first Wario game (Super Mario Land 3: Wario Land) was still labeled as a Mario game.
 

Verde Coeden Scalesworth

Flap and Swish~
Premium
Joined
Aug 13, 2001
Messages
34,454
Location
Cull Hazard
NNID
Irene4
3DS FC
1203-9265-8784
Switch FC
SW-7567-8572-3791
@HyperFalcon
The difference with Yoshi and Wario is that they're still making appearances in Mario games(mostly in spinoffs, but in main series games on occasion as well). Mario hasn't really been a part of the DK series for a while now(the last "DK game" that Mario was in the one on the Gameboy). So it's not just where characters originated that determines from what series a character is from.
Then Wario and Yoshi are not Mario characters. Sorry, but I won't believe they are unless Mario is a DK character. All or nothing.

The originated reason is the only reason that has any real worth, and that's kind of worthless unless you accept the earlier part.

And I find that 100% useless in them being true Mario characters. Yoshi is a Yoshi character that appears in the old series. Wario is a Wario character that appears in the old series. I refuse to call them Mario characters, especially in Smash where they are their own series(which is the key thing in Smash at this time).
 

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,557
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
Big difference between DK and Wario and Yoshi is that Wario and Yoshi first appeared in Mario games where Mario was already establishing himself in a new, own game series. Donkey Kong Country remains totally unattached from the Mario world, and DK didn't need to appear as a boss or rideable object in a Mario game before getting Donkey Kong Country either. :rolleyes:
 

Robert of Normandy

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
9,478
Location
Crossbell City
NNID
shinpichu
3DS FC
2251-3915-5139
Switch FC
SW-4957-7233-2307
@HyperFalcon
...whatever. You keep classifying them as whatever you feel like.(Also, what Diddy said)

Why was this argument even brought up in the first place?
 

Gene

You're a vegetable
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Messages
1,642
Location
NY
NNID
Fairlight92
3DS FC
3411-0266-8945
Well, as far as the "originated" argument goes, Roy made his debut in Melee before the FE game he was being promoted for came out. I guess Roy's a Smash Bros character then.:troll:

:phone:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom