Wots All This Then?
Smash Lord
Should quote it^
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Can you elaborate why you find him scummy? Like, what specifically makes it scummy? A lot of what I remember you saying is that he shouldn't be town because he's being typical Rake and that he had reads you disagreed with.
Honestly I'm feeling a J lynch. He's been spewing FUD all day today and it makes me really dislike him.@Both What do we do with J?
Bloke's townie as ****, probably the towniest slot in the game.@ #HBC | Laundry what do you think of Fanny? Do you agree with Ryker's assessment of him?
This, I think, is the crux of my issue. There's 100% shenanigans going on here from people not claiming (there is a thief this game if Ruy is telling the truth and I'd bet it's not town-aligned as it probably would've claimed by now or tried contacting Rake), but this is a basic thing I don't get:All I was told was I git the phone for hammering and didn't know what to do with it. Then it said I was getting a call and if u answered it would put us in a private convo. Ryu asked what I was doing with his phone and then te convo went dead
Yeh, that's basically how I feel about the damn role. "Your namesake role died so you get a one-shot track." WTF? When the Laundry role dies, does that mean I get a one-shot vig? Or does that happen when the Ryker role dies?Also don't like this magical track ability you gained. That just feels off for all the reasons
Which, yeh, is my point. If it's an anytime action, why can't Rake respond or send a message now? Do they only activate at night?It was claimed to be an anytime action.
What do you make of Rake now throwing the brakes on it then? Even before your vote he was showing some reservations about this and, looking a bit ahead, he seems even more cautious of it.However, Rake was very opportunistic in jumping at Ryu for his role doing something different than he claimed even though I think it's obvious why that happened, and then throwing random points such as Ryu possessing a useless item onto his case. Rake comes off as overzealous scum who overextended in thinking he could mislynch Ryu off this role stuff, and I think he is scum.
Vote: Rake
Honestly, it seems like the only valid explanation as to why the conversation was cut off. I don't see why Ruy could shut the phone off if Rake couldn't and I think that if that was possible, Rake would've mentioned it. It seems more likely that the phone was truly jacked.an item-stealing role sounds plausible,
Actually, here's an interesting point: did Ruy ever throw the brakes on the Rosie wagon or even point out that he wouldn't vote Rosie?but in that situation would Rake just be able to communicate with the thief?
In that situation, why wouldn't I just shoot him? No one was gonna doc his ass.The ability itself could be either alignment. I like that he claimed responsibility for doing it seeing as it was anonymous and he could have kept it hidden, and his target and reasoning checks out to me. Honestly I think he would want to pick Ryker regardless of his alignment, to rolecop him as scum or try to clear or condemn him as scum. I'd prefer to leave the headache of deciphering role crap alone.
Well that stops the potential "Ruy could use the phone beforehand" angle.He voted rosie iirc
@ #HBC | Ryker does your "useless junk" say "you don't know what it does" or simply "this item has no use"?Also dislike kantrip saying essentially: well if ryker can have useless ****, then so can ryu and therefore moot point. Like thats kinda a handwave since ryker and ryu are you know, two different roles and all. Just cause ryker has useless **** doesnt suddenly redeem ryu having useless ****.
Why did you not buy into the Ruy lynch yesterday if his play matters to you?His play comes into it but I'm kinda thinking now that scum ryu really wouldn't claim the one shot track, or even fake it, because its such a out of left fiueld thing to try. Like on first go anyone pushing him would be like : oh look ryu's fear tacting us by claiming he's got this **** with the one shot track he picked up. Like it's not som,ething i can totally see scum ryu going: yeah i'll just tell them hammered rosie got me a one shot track. Like what does it achieve.
I still really dislike him not knowing what the cellphone did because flavor contextually, it's a cellphone, it's gonna make phone calls. kantrip's theory about the roles may hold salt but thats wifom now and the thing that pauses me even moreso is usally amnesiacs just send results randomly as i recall, so why would rosie suddenly have a cell phone, and share said item with ryu , and be sending it to the claimed "gossip mod" like it's alot of ands to tack on that delve into role wifom for me. As i said before i thought ryu had bs'd the claim which is why i brought it up and I'm not sad i did either cause at the very least it kicked ryu in here.
I'm really on the fence now which is why i haven't answered kantrips question about wanting the ryu lynch.
Like part of me just really believes Ryu's hiding aspects of his role but the way's he's talked about it (even though i think laundry calling him out on how it was changing wasn't too far off the truth) it just seems so ridiculous there's a part of me that realizes it's too ridiculous for ryu to do as scum.
I think he's still worth having pressure on at least cause his play D1 wasn't exactly stellar either, which by the way, ryu tried to make it seem like all I'm calling him out on is this, but this is just the major thing, I didn't exactly love ryu yesterday, I did swign away from his lynch to be fair but only because he was doing exactly just enough for me to be willing to take a shot, but with what happened at night, that changed my opinion on how i treated him previosuly
I received absolutely no description on it. I can ask in specific.@ #HBC | Ryker does your "useless junk" say "you don't know what it does" or simply "this item has no use"?
@ #HBC | Red Ryu same questions to you then.I received absolutely no description on it. I can ask in specific.
Nah, I figured that much out both during my reread.I will be here to respond more in-depth, but I think you're stuck on the namesake thing. He's the other moderator role. Raz and Ruy would be the DGames Mods. It's the role being linked to Raz not the role being linked to Ruy the player.
Nothing to do with flavour. I was saying that it was a balance mechanism for the Amnesiac Tracker Recipient to get a one-shot Track when the Amnesiac Tracker died.Yeh, that's basically how I feel about the damn role. "Your namesake role died so you get a one-shot track." WTF? When the Laundry role dies, does that mean I get a one-shot vig? Or does that happen when the Ryker role dies?
Turns out Ryu actually claimed that he was informed his phone was stolen when the conversation cut out.Which, yeh, is my point. If it's an anytime action, why can't Rake respond or send a message now? Do they only activate at night?
I don't like it because he only displayed reservations and started thinking "hmm maybe there's an explanation to this" after I pointed it out in thread and effectively deflated his angle. He was essentially forced to pull back. It doesn't help that he's changed his stance to a very convenient "I don't know, could go either way." It only makes me feel more confident that he is scum.What do you make of Rake now throwing the brakes on it then? Even before your vote he was showing some reservations about this and, looking a bit ahead, he seems even more cautious of it.
THIS THIS THIS!!I don't like it because he only displayed reservations and started thinking "hmm maybe there's an explanation to this" after I pointed it out in thread and effectively deflated his angle. He was essentially forced to pull back. It doesn't help that he's changed his stance to a very convenient "I don't know, could go either way." It only makes me feel more confident that he is scum.
Same was for me.I received absolutely no description on it. I can ask in specific.
I haven't looked at thread since Monday, reading now. But that's the ultimate irony if you're calling us out. Your contenst since then better have been stellar to make such posturings.@ Wots All This Then? where is your content? all I have seen is pokes on other peoples content and nothing to show for today outside of seeing me dead. You have done jack **** today and I will not stand for it.
Try me, get back to me when you catch up then come at me bro.I haven't looked at thread since Monday, reading now. But that's the ultimate irony if you're calling us out. Your contenst since then better have been stellar to make such posturings.