OK Maven, let's go through this whole thing step by step:
1.) I've never voted for J. I've never pushed for him to get lynched, nor did I even actually
argue for it. I simply stated at one point that Dancer's and Fanny's arguments on him were sound. The only other statement I've ever made in this game regarding J was that I think it's wrong of Ryu to let his meta-read on J overrule the fact that his play
can be seen as scummy. In the end we both agreed that J would not make a bad lynch either way. Ryu obviously still thinks that's the case as he's voting for J and I still believe that J wouldn't be a bad lynch as well.
However, J has not played a major role to me so far and your counter-argument to my push aginst you seems to be quite ignorant of this fact. Almost every time you talk about my play it seems like it's centered around "pushes" on "votes" on J that I have never made. I'm not sure what it is that makes it seem so important to you to continuously talk about it
despite the fact that it never happened.
Will you please acknowledge this? Because the way I see it you haven't done so yet. You should probably read my initial accusation again and then respond to it with these facts in mind.
2.) Now that it's hopefully clear where I've been standing with regards to J, you should probably explain to me again why I should be suspicious of Ryu. My initial statement was "so I don't see why people want to lynch Ryu". You reacted by questioning that read through what you thought was my stance on J at that time.
However, that was not actually the stance I had on J. Read through my exchange with Ryu again. The only thing I said to him was that I think it's wrong to hold cerain players to a different standard than others. We ended up disagreeing on this matter - a matter that is not even specifically related to this game. It's an argument that could've been made in any game with and about anybody. We ended up agreeing that lynching J isn't a bad course of action and we both were of the same mindset that his lynch doesn't take high priority regardless.
So tell me again Maven - where do Ryu's and my opinions on J stand in such opposition that I should conclude that Ryu is scummy from it? Even if we
did have conflicting stances on that matter why does it mean that I should read Ryu as scum? Why couldn't I just be of the opinion that Ryu is a misguided townie [like I almost always end up thinking, mind you]?
3.) So if you look at this matter from my point of view you should see the following:
* A lot of your arguments seem to be based around a strong scum read/push on J.
I don't actually have that read though so I take issue with the fact that you implement that so deliberately in your counter argument.
* As a consequence your argument on why I should read Ryu as scum makes precious little sense. But it bothers me that you'd use counterfactual arguments to base that argument on.
* Even if your logic regarding the two previous points had been sound you'd still owe me an explanation on why I should conclude "scum" over "wrong" in Ryu's case.
* Conclusion 1: you try to manipulate me into supporting a Ryu lynch over a non-existent read.
* Conclusion 2: by way of conclusion 1 you also try to establish scumJ as a fact.
* Conclusion 3: through the way you've argued it's apparent that you were setting up a J + Ryu team.
* Conclusion 4: there's a chance that you would've tried to lump me in there as well.
Since the entire thing with all its implications is based on wrong assumptions on your part ... is it really hard to see why I'd read you as scum for it? Once again, I think you should go back an check out the initial arguments and this time you should argue it with
facts.
Also, get a dictionary and look up to meaning of "defensive". I've hardly ever seen that word used so wrong.
![059 :059: :059:]()