• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Reloaded Stagelist Discussion

zApollo

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
839
This thread is designated for discussion about the Melee (and brawl) rulesets for the reloaded major.

Brawl Stagelist
Starters | Counterpicks
Battlefield|Battleship Halberd
Final Destination|Brinstar
Lylat Cruise|Castle Siege
Smashville|Delfino Plaza
|Pokemon Stadium 1
Yoshi's Island (Brawl)|Frigate Orpheon
This brawl stage list is pretty much confirmed, but feel free to discuss away!

Melee Stagelist
Starters | Counterpicks
Dream Land: Fountain of Dreams*|Kanto: Pokemon Stadium
Past Stages: Dream Land|Zebes: Brinstar
Special Stages: Final Destination|
Special Stages: Battlefield|Mushroom Kingdom: Rainbow Ride
Yoshi's Island: Yoshi's Story|Past Stages: Kongo Jungle

________

Pretty sure Drpp counterpicked armada onto RC and won very solidly, peach and jiggs are pretty poor at RC due to the roof and platform layout being terrible for them. Same story with KJ. Size is not the only factor on a stage (and thats why drpp counter picks peaches on DL64 from time to time)

If everyone banned Kongo I'd love that, Let me counter pick them on much more effective stages for free (8



People say KJ favours peaches or puffs. Watch matches from where its been picked in American games, youll notice its the fox/falcos counterpicking that stage. Peach/jiggs lack the mobility to catch a decent fox/falco on that stage due to the sheer size of the stage itself. If anything the stage is too good for fox (and evidently is the main reason for banning it in most places due to circle camping, which doesn't happen here)

You say everyone bans kongo, but even last monthly I played it first match against some players, and other sets i've picked it myself or had it picked against me. It's far from "not played" except for lower level play (mostly because no one understands the stage/simply don't like it, which is a terrible reason to ban something)

If we banned stuff because no one liked it, say goodbye to sheik for melbourne rofl
If anything, if the majority want no kongo, IMO we shouldn't look to substitute it with stages that are just as questionable.

Anyone happy with the super conservative euro ruleset? That being:

Neutrals:
FoD
FD
BF
YS
DL64

Counter Picks:
PKS



I'd prefer that over letting brinstar/rc/other crap in whilst substituting for kongo
It isn't just a matter of not liking KJ and banning it for that. It should be banned because it can be used very effectively for camping by any character with mobility. it means sheiks and fox and cf will love it. I play those characters and i still don't like it. i just don't like the campy style of play it induces. Ban KJ keep PKS, Brinstar, and RC as counter picks. They are pretty good stages and I don't see any reason to ban them both.
It's the simple idea of "if its not balanced enough to be a neutral, its not balanced enough to be played"

If you have a look around, A large amount of the american pros will post this.

If any stage is balanced rather than KJ (circle camp deluxe) it's RC (which IMO is just as bad for its own reasons, if not worse)

If the majority disagrees with Kongo, I'd prefer to go with the Euro stage list rather than adding in Brinstar/RC or such to CPS

If what you say is true Redact, why does the Euro stage list you posted include Pokemon Stadium? You make no sense. There would be no "counterpick" stages in the first place if there were such a criteria players followed such as "if it's not balanced enough as a neutral it's not balanced enough to be played". Just because PS was a neutral at one point doesn't mean the Smash community was right to have categorized it as one.

I ask you, what is the point of a counterpick system without counterpick stages? You have not shown a valid reason as to why RC, Brinstar or Kongo cannot be counterpick stages beyond "some American pros say so" which is as half ***** an argument if there ever was one. I can just say "if a stage is not balanced enough as a neutral it can be considered for eligibility as a counterpick stage, else it should be banned" and say that you'll see American pros saying the same thing, suddenly my argument is no less valid than yours is considering how much evidence you've bothered to give. Give reasons for a stage being banned or counterpick, not flimsy half-quotes from people you haven't even proven exist let alone presume they have any authority over tournament rulesets.
and so forth.
 

pressokman

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
155
Location
Saskatoon
Nice collection of quotes. good debate going on. we know a few things for sure atm

1. Everyone is ok saying goodbye to KJ
2. Some people are happy having ONLY NEUTRALS
3. Some people are happy having PKS, Brinstar, RC as CP's

The fact that interstate people are complaining about reloaded having counter picks when to my knowledge most people were happy with the stage list at ACL is weird and seems like there is a bit of condescension towards Adelaide. Doesn't affect me because I'm Canadian but the random animosity isn't needed. This thread is a great chance to set a precedent for future Australian majors; for people from all states to participate in discussion about whether or not to keep PKS, Brinstar, and RC.

I love the neutral stages. I see the appeal of getting rid of the CP but i don't think anyone has given a good enough reason to omit brinstar and RC and especially PKS. They are fair for most characters and characters that do bad on brinstar do good on RC vise versa.

My vote is keep them unless somebody gives a valid argument to remove them. I wont be sour because i love the neutrals.
 

Redact

Professional Nice Guy
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
3,811
Location
Amazing Land
Euro stagelist, with all of my arguements quoted is my current stance, this is most likley being reflected at melbourne tourneys from now on (unless someone convinces me otherwise)



POST FROM RELOADED THREAD:

If what you say is true Redact, why does the Euro stage list you posted include Pokemon Stadium? You make no sense. There would be no "counterpick" stages in the first place if there were such a criteria players followed such as "if it's not balanced enough as a neutral it's not balanced enough to be played". Just because PS was a neutral at one point doesn't mean the Smash community was right to have categorized it as one.
This is due to the stage striking system, stage striking heavily favours one player if the amount of stages are even, PKS is there due to it generally being classified as the least neutral of the neutral stages, long with the bugs the stages can present (falling through the stage). In no way is it a CP due to the lack of balance, its due to the bugs first and foremost.

I ask you, what is the point of a counterpick system without counterpick stages? You have not shown a valid reason as to why RC, Brinstar or Kongo cannot be counterpick stages beyond "some American pros say so" which is as half ***** an argument if there ever was one. I can just say "if a stage is not balanced enough as a neutral it can be considered for eligibility as a counterpick stage, else it should be banned" and say that you'll see American pros saying the same thing, suddenly my argument is no less valid than yours is considering how much evidence you've bothered to give. Give reasons for a stage being banned or counterpick, not flimsy half-quotes from people you haven't even proven exist let alone presume they have any authority over tournament rulesets.
http://www.smashboards.com/showpost.php?p=12858557&postcount=6

The point of a counter pick system is to provide the person a stage they are more comfortable with playing, rather than providing them a stage with an obvious advantage. The idea is that you play a balanced stage that you are most comfortable with, thus only the most balanced stages should be selectable (those being the 6 generally accepted stages).

KJ can be circle camped beyond beleif for many characters, peach vs any faster character. Ganon vs any faster character so on. Theres plenty of matches out there showing that (pink shinobi vs crocrock i think)
RC's lack of ledges at many points, moving stage and rediculously low ceiling for most parts provides rediculous advantages for some characters (Space animals) along with a wall perfect for infinites being available at the very start.
Brinstar's suffers from the same issues as RC, where as the stage just favours some characters too heavily, such as sheik.

As I said, the stages available should all be well balanced in MOST matchups (if we catered to every matchup, no stages would be available) where as staged like KJ64, Brinstar and RC favour some characters IMMENSLY in a large amount of matchups, being an almost guaranteed ban when some characters are being used regardless of their matchup (id happily take ANYONE to rc as falco)


Yes I understand some neutrals favour some characters in certain matchups, but the 6 provided are by far the most even stages, with the buggy one being placed as a counter pick.
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
I love how everyone flamed me at Robocop when I suggested that Poke Floats and Corneria should be banned, and now everyone wants neutrals-only xD

Annnyway, what Redact is saying is true, a stage is either fit for competition or it isn't, there is no middle-ground. The reason for having starters and counter-picks is completely different and has more to do with practicality when striking (If Brinstar was a starter, it would very rarely be picked for Game 1 due to striking, despite it being a legit stage, so it's a waste of time to have it).

I think it's worth mentioning that being good on lots of stages is a character strength and NOT a fault of the stages. For example, Fox just happens to be really good on the majority of stages (legal and otherwise) so our "sample" stage list of legal stages should reflect that so as not to arbitrarily balance the game.

Personally, I'm not too bothered by the stage list, I'll go with whatever it ends up being as long as it isn't something stupid.

In order of neutrality, the stage list (imo) would be:
1. Battlefield
2. Fountain of Dreams
3. Yoshi's Story
4. Dreamland
5. Final Destination
6. Pokemon Stadium
7. Rainbow Ride
8. Brinstar
9. Kongo Jungle

Or something similar.

Euro stage list seems like the way to go. It's nice and simple and I doubt it'd get many complaints [as opposed to having KJ legal, leading to (hypothetically) a camp-fest for some otherwise interesting matches].

If we banned stuff because no one liked it, say goodbye to sheik for melbourne rofl
This quote made me laugh out loud given your stance on Wobbling's legality.
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
@Sevens
We can discuss whatever we want, discussion isn't always to promote change. For example:

Lol at the awful Brawl stage list.

@Tak
Just sayin', it's weird that he doesn't want to ban stuff because people don't like it, but he DOES want to ban Wobbling.
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
Is there any reason Nova is being arrogant about the Brawl stage-list other than to exercise his power?

It would make A LOT more sense to use the Unity rule-set (i.e. the standard which all of the largest tournaments in America use).
 

zApollo

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
839
The unity rulset is fine. Then again I don't mind the current ruleset we have, since it is a major and RC is banned in the majority of the other states. My only gripe is that FD should be swapped with PS1, but that is unlikely.

Heck I'd even support some sort of conditional ban on frigate orpheon after seeing this video.
 

pressokman

Smash Apprentice
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
155
Location
Saskatoon
Lol @ this being a "vic major" held in adelaide sponsored by nova.

I still think the stages are legit enough but won't be sad to see them go. RC isn't really that broken for falco and fox infinites on RC isn't really a concern for australia. I obviously like brinstar but i think jiggs would be by far the most broken character on that stage in pal. since dekar and redact have final say i wont discuss this any further.
 

Attila_

The artist formerly known as 'shmot'
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
6,025
Location
Melbourne, Australia
Heck I'd even support some sort of conditional ban on frigate orpheon after seeing this video.
that wouldnt work against a half decent snake!

ruins characters with bad/no projectiles though.

i also quite like the unity ruleset, but it doesnt make sense to implement a new ruleset into a national. plan on trialling it at subsequent monthlys, though.
 

Redact

Professional Nice Guy
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
3,811
Location
Amazing Land
I'm not looking to enstate this for reloaded, but just posting this as food for thought.

Has anyone else thought of moving FD to counterpick instead of PS?

Say we took the euro stagelist and swapped those stages, we get:

FoD
PS
YS
DL64
BF
---
FD

The reasoning behind this is that FD skews matchups worse than PS imo

Like with PS, you generally dont pick it vs fox, but some players may prefer it in some matchups vs fox, ego: Fox v Falco. Like sure lighter characters vs fox on that stage is questionable, but you have many factors to work with on the stage.


The problem with FD, there are some matchups you would NEVER pick the stage for.

I'd love to see someone ever leave FD legal vs an IC's or DK. The stage is pretty messed up for some other matchups like spacies v marth (my opinion) or spacies v puff (dekar's opinion). Most matches that involve falco is either Falco banning FD vs someone that can chaingrab him, or him having FD banned against him.

This is all just my opinion, but anyone else like this idea?




On another note, Grim 5 dollar mm me using your all stages legal, each strike from the list rule. I want to see what shenanigans i can get up to.
 

Grim Tuesday

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 4, 2007
Messages
13,444
Location
Adelaide, South Australia, AUS
Alright Phil, I'll MM you :). Don't get too confident, Monkeybear challenged me to a set with the same conditions earlier this year for the same reason, and only barely won 2-3.

I like the idea of replacing FD with PS.
 

Redact

Professional Nice Guy
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
3,811
Location
Amazing Land
Alright Phil, I'll MM you :). Don't get too confident, Monkeybear challenged me to a set with the same conditions earlier this year for the same reason, and only barely won 2-3.

I like the idea of replacing FD with PS.
The set's not really about winning, it's more about attempting stupid stage abuse rofl
 

Dekar289

Smash Hero
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
6,306
yer talked with red on irc, we agree
for reloaded

neutrals:
battlefield
dreamland 64
final destination
fountain of dreams
yoshi's story

counterpicks:
pokemon stadium
 

Splice

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
5,126
Location
AUS
Lylat is way better a starter than PS1. As long as you have Lylat in starters its fine
Coz that means you are either taking out PS1 or FD which both favour the same top tier characters pretty much

And then you have balance.

The rest is fine, you have Halberd and Delfino, and no Pictochat, so your CPs are fine.
ezpz

So dont worry bout that.

Is Euro stagelist for Melee final? Change OP to reflect this?
 

Pantsmann

Smash Lord
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
1,288
Location
Brisbane - northside
since i'm not going i don't expect anybody at all to care about my opinion, but when did we all suddenly want a ridiculously small stage list? is australia really that good to warrant only fair stages? are we really that good that stage abuse is an issue? i didn't think that our general skill level was high enough for such things to be a problem. i'm asking this out of a "i don't know what's going on, why is this all happening?" sort of way, not a "i think you're all wrong" sort of way.

also i love the idea of FD being counterpick.
 

EverAlert

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
3,433
Location
Australia
NNID
EVAL89
3DS FC
2664-2214-3431
since i'm not going i don't expect anybody at all to care about my opinion, but when did we all suddenly want a ridiculously small stage list? is australia really that good to warrant only fair stages? are we really that good that stage abuse is an issue? i didn't think that our general skill level was high enough for such things to be a problem. i'm asking this out of a "i don't know what's going on, why is this all happening?" sort of way, not a "i think you're all wrong" sort of way.

also i love the idea of FD being counterpick.
We'll stay **** at the game if we behave like we're **** at the game.
 

EverAlert

Smash Master
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
3,433
Location
Australia
NNID
EVAL89
3DS FC
2664-2214-3431
well we do also have other fundamental issues preventing us from being better. however those are different from acting like we're ****, which is an attitude that guarantees failure in all possible timeframes.
 

tedeth

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
4,074
Location
FAULCONNNN-BRRRIIIIDGE!!!
We should have a competitive stage list because we are a competitive scene.

Just because the US isn't as good at SC2 as Korea doesn't mean they should use dumb maps.
 

Splice

Smash Hero
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
5,126
Location
AUS
If it is the fairest stagelist, then we should use it...
Do you mean to say we don't deserve it because we are not good enough for it? lol

The stagelist the way it is, is still fair for us because it is a simple ruleset
Minimal stages does simplify things, and all players will be in their element

As a competitive scene, removing stages that are plainly on another level of "fair" (read: Rainbow Cruise is not on the same level of fair as Battlefield) takes away things that allow for the possibility of a player coming away and losing due to lack of knowledge of the stage, or because the stage is ********, or doesn't let them play the way they play best.
A conservative ruleset keeps things simple and ensures a more PvP-in-their-element orientated set.

Do you see.
 
Top Bottom