Roy: Chance: 2%
Roy is dead. Ike stole his fire sword, Lucina stole his position as a Marth clone. The only way I could see Roy appearing in this iteration of Smash Bros in a playable fashion is either DLC or as an alt costume of Marth's. But unless we are getting 60+ characters there is no way we will be seeing Roy on the initial, playable roster.
Want: 10%
Roy's inclusion as his own spot on the roster is utterly pointless, and I really couldn't care less if he appears or not.
Dark Pit Chance: 60%
(Excellent! I've been wanting to go on this rant for ages!)
Dark Pit was shown in Palutena's trailer without a character splash, therefore, he can't be playable, as Sakurai would never show a character before their official reveal. Sakurai said that characters were shown on the website if they were playable, therefore he can't be playable, right? Riiiiiiiight?
WRONG!
Not only is this a foolish belief, it's downright false! By the logic behind this:
=Spirit Tracks Cameo
=Statue on Hyrule Temple 2.0
=Find Mii Stage Cameo
=Disconfirmed to be playable\
Even in past games, Marth and Ness were shown before release for Brawl, Ganondorf, Jigglypuff, and Pichu were in the Melee trailer, and Marth was shown during Captain Falcons mini trailer.
Announcing a character before an initial release, without specifying their role, is something that not only sounds like Sakurai would do, but it's something he has
already done! It's why I'm so confident Ridley is playable, why I think several of our "deconfirmed" characters should not be listed as such, (Lip, Zoroark, Wonder Red, Isa), and why I'm going to start nominating a Rayman rerate the second nominations are started again (He has 2 different trophies!). There just isn't enough to warrant them being called "Deconfirmed"!
We have never seen a Zoroark Pokeball to date, not even from the demo. (Which showed several Pokeballs that hadn't been confirmed, as well as all those in the Greninja trailer other then Zoroark) There has been no word if Lip is disconfirmed (Villager has boxing gloves, Little Mac disconfirmed). Characters have trophies too, and Isa... no, just no. A sin and punishment icon would immediately point to more representation from that franchise (Which is very unlikely, but
not disconfirmed), of
course they wouldn't show one of a character was coming from that franchise. I could make arguments for more, but those are the 4 that really bug me.
Now why would Dark Pit have a spot on the roster?
Simple. Easy clone is easy.
Lucina already shows that this can happen, and Dark Pit is the next easiest way this could happen again. Dark Pit will definitely be in the game in some form, we've seen him in trailers, and he's an obvious, 100% costume change if he isn't his own slot. Seperating a costume change into a seperate spot on the roster as a clone, especially if they already have the model and animations from said character being an alt costume, is
stupidly easy. Tweak the stats, change the logic connections of how said character is selected in the game, add a picture on the character roster, and bam, separate character.
Want: 80%
Dark Pit is a really cool character, but alot of this want is simply to show people to stop making precedents for deconfirmed characters when said precedents don't exist (Ike has to be replaced cause he replaced Roy, obviously a pattern that we have that has happened
once), or are just outright false.
Rant over. I'll probably come back and reorganize and word it better, but I'm really tired right now