¯\_S.(ツ).L.I.D._/¯
Smash Legend
The fact that love is the driving force behind most marriages in this country makes it pretty **** valid in my opinion.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Because it can be applied to more then just humans, and if this gay marriage starts to make an example of how traditional marriage can be not traditional, marriage will lose it's validity.Just curious here... what is so ridculous about the love argument?
That's not a person of your sex. That's a picture![]()
I would hit it.
And personally I'm not sexually attracted to creatures with microscopic mouths and eyes that take up 70% of their face.That's not a person of your sex. That's a picture
Allowing homosexuals to marry as a couple would do two things that I disagree with:Sure. I agree with you that you should care what other people do if it affects others in adverse ways. But gay marriage does not affect you in any adverse way...
I still do not understand your "it would appear to be that you are fine with murder," concept.
It causes certain ceremonies and norms that are dear to my heart to be tainted and ruined.No because murders makes me feel threatened that I can be murdered. How does gay marriage affect your life personally?
That's all fine and good but there is a seperation between church and state for precisely this reason. Laws created from personal bias and hatred is completely unacceptable.Allowing homosexuals to marry as a couple would do two things that I disagree with:
1. It would degenerate the concept of marriage
2. It would imply that homosexual relations are gaining social acceptance and are becoming a norm.
It causes certain ceremonies and norms that are dear to my heart to be tainted and ruined.
To fully explain my position would require a lengthy religious diatribe, and that's not exactly something I want to do, particularly not now and DEFINITELY not in this thread.
Marriage has already had any sense of meaning stripped away from it by the government. It's not an institution of religion, any traditional and sentimental reason for marriage is far outweighed by the legal benefits, and denying gays the same legal rights as everybody else is unconstitutional.Because it can be applied to more then just humans, and if this gay marriage starts to make an example of how traditional marriage can be not traditional, marriage will lose it's validity.
More people will start to push for marriages that are not so traditional, and in time marriage will lose it's meaning.
Denied me cousins?Kofu, you're an idiot
what has a gay person ever done to you?
Why wouldn't inter-species marriage not work, what if I love my dog? Why wouldn't any kind of marriage not work?Marriage has already had any sense of meaning stripped away from it by the government. It's not an institution of religion, any traditional and sentimental reason for marriage is far outweighed by the legal benefits, and denying gays the same legal rights as everybody else is unconstitutional.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/mar_bene.htm
Marriage won't lose it's meaning - the only difference will be that a man and a woman could marry. Don't bring up something silly like inter-species marriage, or marrying a small child, because that wouldn't work - marriage takes place between two consenting adults, and if those two happen to be of the same sex, so be it! They shouldn't be denied the legal benefits of marriage, and they shouldn't be given some bull**** separate-but-equal title.
Keep this in mind: if your parents were gay you wouldn't exist. I can name other non-religious reasons, but can you argue against this in particular?how does he feel about your beliefs?
what instilled these beliefs in you?
Depends on whether you count when they're in heat.@Interspecies marriage: You may love your dog but does your dog love you?
So signing a piece of paper with your name on it validates your love for one another?@Interspecies marriage: You may love your dog but does your dog love you? There's no way of knowing. Gay marriage and interpecies marriage are completely separate.
edit: nevermind i have to go but i'll respond to stuff laterKeep this in mind: if your parents were gay you wouldn't exist. I can name other non-religious reasons, but can you argue against this in particular?
Obviously, some gays do have children, and most gays acutally do have finances and property *gasp*Also where does Gay Divorce fall into this? What are the legal ramifications for this? In terms of children, financial, and property? They obviously wouldn't be the same as a male-female marriage.
Yeah exactly, so what happens in a divorce? What if a gay couple adopts the children, where does that child go in a divorce? What about finances and property, how are they determined in a divorce?Obviously, some gays do have children, and most gays acutally do have finances and property *gasp*
A dog cannot consent to marriage, that's what I'm trying to say.So signing a piece of paper with your name on it validates your love for one another?
But wait since when are marriages allowed because of love? It's all just assumed...
Because your dog doesn't have the intelligence to consent to marrying you - that's the difference. Sex comes along with marriage, and having sex with animals is considered animal abuse, which is illegal.Why wouldn't inter-species marriage not work, what if I love my dog? Why wouldn't any kind of marriage not work?
Hypothetically, wouldn't my feelings not be valid just like 2 gay people are towards each other?
While I may think this is obviously dumb, other people in the US might not. Many other arguments like this will arise because of gay marriage, because "Hey if marriage was questioned and changed after being exclusive between a male and female for the last couple of centuries, why can't it be questioned again?"
Uh, what? Why wouldn't it be the same?Also where does Gay Divorce fall into this? What are the legal ramifications for this? In terms of children, financial, and property? They obviously wouldn't be the same as a male-female marriage.
What does procreation have to do with anything? Straight people still far outnumber gay people - and even if the day does come where the majority of the world is gay, people could still have babies. The current mating rituals we have would change, to ensure the survival of our species.tbqh, the negatives of gay marriage imo outweigh the positives. Not to mention that there is absouletely no procreation in a gay marriage, unless you count a surrogate.
Because your dog doesn't have the intelligence to consent to marrying you - that's the difference. Sex comes along with marriage, and having sex with animals is considered animal abuse, which is illegal.
Obviously the dog or any other animal can't consent, but the fact is that people will see gay marriage as a way of pushing towards other types of marriages since a traditional MALE-FEMALE marriage has been overturned/question after a hundreds of years of being the same. While I'm not smart enough on the subject of other types of marriages like inter-species/objects I could see other people bringing up arguments for this. What would happen if it did succeed and we were to marry anything? It would destroy the concept of marriage.
http://mediamatters.org/research/200905120006
^Just a link to show im not the only person who feels that this might happen.
Uh, what? Why wouldn't it be the same?
Because child custody is determined for the best interest of the child. In many Straight marriage/divorce cases that person is usually the mother. How would this be determined in a Gay marriage/divorce? That's probably the biggest concern I see in a Gay Divorce. There is still finances and property to be determined.
What does procreation have to do with anything? Straight people still far outnumber gay people - and even if the day does come where the majority of the world is gay, people could still have babies. The current mating rituals we have would change, to ensure the survival of our species.
Marriage is usually a community benefit, it benefits the community/world. Sure you can say "I DONT CARE ABOUT THE HEALTH OF THE WORLD OR COMMUNITY" still, gay marriages offer no benefit to the community.
I actually edited that part. But what do you mean to people like me?gay marriage is only taboo to people like you
Objects and animals can't consent. Humans can. If you can't see how that makes the situations inherently different, I don't know what to say. Also, please never use Bill O'Reilly as a form of validation, ever.Obviously the dog or any other animal can't consent, but the fact is that people will see gay marriage as a way of pushing towards other types of marriages since a traditional MALE-FEMALE marriage has been overturned/question after a hundreds of years of being the same. While I'm not smart enough on the subject of other types of marriages like inter-species/objects I could see other people bringing up arguments for this. What would happen if it did succeed and we were to marry anything? It would destroy the concept of marriage.
http://mediamatters.org/research/200905120006
^Just a link to show im not the only person who feels that this might happen.
I don't think you quite understand how it works. A full investigation is put into place to determine which parent is best for the child. Incidentally, this is usually the mother, but the father is found better suited to take care of the kids sometimes too. Just like in straight marriages, they would investigate to find out which partner is better for taking care of the kids.Because child custody is determined for the best interest of the child. In many Straight marriage/divorce cases that person is usually the mother. How would this be determined in a Gay marriage/divorce? That's probably the biggest concern I see in a Gay Divorce. There is still finances and property to be determined.
Marriage hasn't been for community benefit in years. These days it's primarily about love and secondarily about legal benefits. Not many people look at anything else when it comes to marriage.Marriage is usually a community benefit, it benefits the community/world. Sure you can say "I DONT CARE ABOUT THE HEALTH OF THE WORLD OR COMMUNITY" still, gay marriages offer no benefit to the community.
You know first hand?i know first hand. it is not a choice. if your friend switched then hes either bisexual or posing
Have you heard of the guy in Korea who married his pillow?You know first hand?
Educate me
@Crimson, that was pretty meanBut if my children do "turn" out gay because of their choices, I won't support that, I will still love my children however. Will I attend their wedding if gay marriage is legal in my state? No....
Also Crimson, I'm not comparing same-sex marriage with other marriages. I'm just saying that allowing same-sex marriage will give others incentive to bring up arguments for other marriages, which devalues the meaning of marriage even more so than same-sex marriage
Have you heard of the guy in Korea who married his pillow?