I can agree with ROB, GaW and CF not really belonging if you look from the beginning, since they never had any real combat role in their games. The difference? They are already in. Taking them out damages the game more than it helps it. They are not valid as an argument for the inclusion of characters of equal ridiculousness. That's like saying "well hey, this doesn't make sense, so let's make less sense!" It is an argument against their inclusion, but as I've already said, it's a little bit late for that. ROB's moveset makes sense, as a robot at least, and it's not out of the realm of reality that a robot might be used for combat. Falcon's essentially a smash icon now. I don't think he really needs an explanation. GaW is like the only of these three whose only reason for continued inclusion is "...well... he was in the last one and we don't want to take him out 'cause some people won't like that." He's 2 dimensional for one, which is on a level of silliness no other character matches, fights almost exclusively with food and household items, most of which don't fit as combat items, another thing no character has claims to, etc etc. Point is, GaW makes significantly less sense for inclusion as a character. But he's still already in. That doesn't mean we just go adding characters willy nilly and when we come across the problem of convincing the player that their moveset makes sense that we just refer to GaW in our defense... no, referring to GaW is an argument against GaW, not for more GaW.
). 
