"Must have"She was in the vid, must of missed her but ether way mad hype for zoot suit samus
![]()
She wasn't.Still eagerly eagerly waiting for ZSS confirm, but she was in the video, so I guess that works.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
"Must have"She was in the vid, must of missed her but ether way mad hype for zoot suit samus
![]()
She wasn't.Still eagerly eagerly waiting for ZSS confirm, but she was in the video, so I guess that works.
no the second video is not for Demo 2.Is the second video canon for Demo 2? If so, Ness is in it, which would make him the last remaining unconfirmed character. It could easily be false, just mentioning that no other unconfirmed characters are in at all, but yeah I have no idea of the validity of the video.
Actually, "must of" instead of "must have" is pretty outlandish in its wrongness.Dont be an *******
![]()
no the second video is not for Demo 2.
and why are people convinced that trailer clips confirm characters? if u didn't notice, most if not all the clips in the trailer are old....from before the Demo2 roster was even decided. Although I do believe everyone in the trailer will be in the Demo.
This doesn't make sense to me since I alluded to this information in my theorysmash P:M cycle.Your arguments make sense but you are forgetting something. Melee is an old game. Alot of 3 year fox mains will figure out the new MU's in a months time.
Uh, I never said I wanted Melee vets to dominate. I think the characters should be balanced around Marth, Peach, and C. Falcon (high tiers) and not Fox and Falco, but thats not implying I want them to dominate.Something I can't understand is you want Melee vets to dominate but you also want Zelda to be nerfed....
What is this? Are you applying Darwinism to a GAME!? You act like the P:M team is forced into disbalance based on a character's attributes. This is a childish argument.Another thing you are forgetting is the fact that new characters are already overall better than Melee's cast(not including buffed returning characters). Even before meleefication if you look at all that the characters are capable of doing.
So you are acknowledging he doesn't have any weaknesses which the opponent player could take advantage of/a Pit player has to take into account? And that "flight" strength which you casually passed off affects several aspects of his game, including recovery, offstage edgeguarding, outmanuerving slow characters who don't have projectiles like Pit, and his cross up game and approach seems really freaking good.Pit - Has swords, arrows, reflecting shield, decent speed, WINGS.
How many characters could fly in melee? none technically. This has to be taken into account and it has by the PMBR. Pit has so many tools by default that they would have to take away one in order to give him a real solid weakness. As for strengths his only real strength that sticks out is his flight. aside from that he's not the best at any other aspect of smash.
I never suggested making characters awful. If you are going to keep putting words into peoples' mouths, quit trying to make points. And even if he may still be harder than Sheik, it doesn't justify anything because Sheik is not balanced, and he is still weaknessless and that puts him in a similar league as her.Fact of the matter is this is melee 2.0 and with that comes new dimensions that everyone will have to adjust too over time. To make Zelda terrible again or to Nerf Pit to the level of Melee's Donkey Kong would serve no purpose. He has the tools to be good and it he ends up as a good character it makes sense. As for him being easy button I don't think he's half as easy as Sheik. The people who play him have been playing him for months. Some for years. Same goes for Zelda.
Snake and Sonic had intentional design choices which included specific flaws and strengths. Poor game mechanics serves as justification for melee vets not playing well, but Snake and Sonic were designed specifically for the P:M enviroment at that time. I think people just wanted instant gratification and ease of use from the P:M characters and got frustrated when they realized that they were going to have to apply strengths and overcome weaknesses to utilize Snake and Sonic to their full potential... remember how cool it was when we saw those old FireBallStars videos with him doing work with Sonic? Characters that take devotion are more interesting to watch. That is why these characters should be designed in a model following Marth and C. Falcon and blah blah blah like I've said a hundred times and not like Sheik.As for Snake and Sonic. I think the difficulty for them was a combination of the mechanics being way to off and other aspects like Snake's weight made things seem worse then they were. I actually liked Sonic in demo vs 1. He has alot of weaknesses but his strength(speed) is a huge stand out.
True but if i were to say must of in a conversation in person no one would correct me b/c its common in todays speech, plus u understand the meaning. And seeing how support the argument that if one can understand the meaning then its not incorrect, plus correcting someones speech/writing is a **** move made into a even bigger **** move b/c its online added to that is the fact i am writing on a phone at work so i rush. So u put all that together and it equals being an *******Actually, "must of" instead of "must have" is pretty outlandish in its wrongness.
In retort, would you say the same thing if your English teacher had made the correction instead of some random internet user?True but if i were to say must of in a conversation in person no one would correct me b/c its common in todays speech, plus u understand the meaning. And seeing how support the argument that if one can understand the meaning then its not incorrect, plus correcting someones speech/writing is a **** move made into a even bigger **** move b/c its online added to that is the fact i am writing on a phone at work so i rush. So u put all that together and it equals being an *******
![]()
I am not in school. But r we talking about it written out or if i was talking in person to a english teacher and they corrected me? B/c in person i would say something. If i wrote an essay, then checked it over and missed that mistake then no b/c its my fault for missing it. If i had to write a quick essay in class then yes i would make a argumentIn retort, would you say the same thing if your English teacher had made the correction instead of some random internet user?
Lol wtf? This isn't Melee 2.0... it's a totally different game altogether. You say it like you're implying people who play Melee will naturally switch over...
This is just a sideproject
o. oCan I call this Melee 2.0?
Yes.
The spoken word rebuttal falls apart because Must've is a contraction that sounds exactly like Must of, which is where this very common misunderstanding comes from.True but if i were to say must of in a conversation in person no one would correct me b/c its common in todays speech, plus u understand the meaning. And seeing how support the argument that if one can understand the meaning then its not incorrect, plus correcting someones speech/writing is a **** move made into a even bigger **** move b/c its online added to that is the fact i am writing on a phone at work so i rush. So u put all that together and it equals being an *******
![]()
"... you..."So u put all that together and it equals being an *******
![]()
I can appreciate that viewpoint then. My English teacher always made the point that how you say something doesn't matter as much as how you write something because it's easier to convey understanding through speech.I am not in school. But r we talking about it written out or if i was talking in person to a english teacher and they corrected me? B/c in person i would say something. If i wrote an essay, then checked it over and missed that mistake then no b/c its my fault for missing it. If i had to write a quick essay in class then yes i would make a argument
![]()
i would love to be able to use snakes nair and dair out of a short hop l;o
even if we have to l cancel it i wana have snakes aerials be useful on a sh
Why thank you : Dhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLCyjl4JdiE&feature=g-u-u&context=G22865a9FUAAAAAAAAAA&t=01m48s
That lucas combo was too hype
It worked like this in melee. It's just an explanation as to how JC grabs work."Jump Cancel Grabs slide a little bit due to momentum from the previous action"
was this fixed?
that's LiverySpecks. and Lucas magnet no longer works like that correct?Not a problem "mystery" man.
That wasn't a double jump. It was just a shorthop rest. The video zooming in and rotating a bit may have thrown you off.at 8 seconds in that video puff does a double jump out of rest. why?
it's under the "know issues" listIt worked like this in melee. It's just an explanation as to how JC grabs work.
Some of the clips are indeed old. 10 internet cookies to the first person who can identify the clip in the trailer that was actually recorded BEFORE DEMO 1.no the second video is not for Demo 2.
and why are people so convinced that trailer clips confirm characters? if u didn't notice, most if not all the clips in the trailer are old....from before the Demo2 roster was even decided. Although I do believe everyone in the trailer will be in the Demo.
With L-canceling, all Snake's aerials are much more useful low to the ground. SH nair is particularly excellent for pressure/spacing/approaching.Not sure where I can post suggestions, so I will try here. There's a couple a friend of mine asked for.