Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I think I kind of a agree with all of that. Zant wound up being a scrub. Man did I love the combat. I miss the 50 level dungeon or whatever that was. And yeah the final Dorf sword fight made my heart soar.
The whole game was pathetically easy.
Try the help forums, or ask in the netplay discussions, I don't think asking in the social thread where we talk about anime and almost nothing about smash is going to help.
Opposite but Equally Unpopular Opinion Time:
My problem with SF is that it encourages campy play A LOT and gives defensive players a strong advantage from the outset. Movement is limited, jumping forward is no-no, and combos are hard, short and unexciting. My character choice in 2D fighters represents this mindset: I think camping is boring, tedious and adds almost no depth to the game. Zoning is different from camping, where it's used for space control rather than strictly avoiding confrontation with the opponent. A lot of the old school fighting game heads dig SF4 because it harkens back to SF2 where there's a heavy focus on fundamentals, but you can still have a deep fighter and at least make it more exciting. And then there's a whole laundry list more of why I don't like it that I won't get into here.
IIRC this all started with Wind Waker, I'll never forgive that game for thatThe whole game was pathetically easy.
...Smash should not be though of as less campy than SF, LOL.
Yes.So today I learned that a world of Fox hate is out there.
Is the burd kewl tho?
I was just watching Beast Wars clips today >_> weird. I only just recently found out that the guy who voiced Goku also voiced Cheetor... so it's all totally bizarre now.I decided to spare you lot from a deluge for once.
Don't think this will be a regular thing, though!
Completely understandable. It is the new, official title that is coming out after all, so it's reasonable that you may start finding PM, Brawl, or Melee boring for the time being because of the encroaching hype. Once you get your hands on Smash 4, however, the hype will die down, and everyone will probably gravitate back to their respective games, or stick with Smash 4.
To be fair, 3D Zelda was never difficult.
I didn't mention Smash anywhere in my post. I'm talking in terms of 2D fighters.
PM will never be made obsolete by an official Nintendo Smash game. As long as the gameplay styles are significantly different, the Smash games will coexist. A lot of traditional fighter players play more than one game in the same genre.
Arguably I would say they made Ganon's in-game character the best in Wind Waker, so it balances out.
It's still the previous game in Smash canon, though. I'll definitely get bullied for being stuck in the past if I keep playing P:M, because the people I know are all jerks who hold ansolute power over my life.
This is why I play 3rd Strike.
You need to row row fight da powah
wow.
P:M is in no way made obsolete by Smash4, and this is coming from somebody who plans on getting and thoroughly enjoying that game. Yes, Smash4 has better graphics, cool new characters and stages, and interesting customizability, but one thing is for certain - gameplay is going to be much different.
Interesting but isn't SF defensive in nature throughout the series though? Personally I don't mind defensive games but as long as the defense/offense ratio isn't skewed majorly like it was in Brawl cause that piss me off massively.
I can't tell if that's a joke post or not. If it is, way to go.
Pretty much. I only really play the 3rd Strike characters in SF4 too.
That's not even an opinion.
