I don't see the circle jerk OR the "cult of hatred" or w/e lol
Basically I just said I don't like the way he argues (it's fairly ignorant of fact usually, and always trying to draw out a response without actually stating a position for counter-criticism), said that's why I have him on ignore
And said that I have an argument against his that I'm not going into detail this early in the morning/late in the night
But I do see you using just one example of a short discussion you had where he acted very out of character
My point is that if you all dislike arguing with Bleck, just agree to disagree. He wasn't acting out of character, I'm just the only person who unironically was okay with conceding the validity of a point of view I wholly disagree with. He doesn't pursue arguments, he states his opinion. There's a lot of things we all disagree with, and honestly I can't say I disagree with y'all's approach to things either, but I find my way much more agreeable.
There's nothing wrong with disliking the guy for his opinions, but the cult I see is of people disliking him for the way he defends his opinions when others question them. The way he expresses himself is often not harmonious, but I like to think that that's because he has a personality, and I find it endearing, if occasionally upsetting.
If you all dislike his opinions, then say so. More often than not though it seems like he wins your arguments, or at least infuriates y'all to the point of stalemate, so why not just accept or enquire into his opinions instead of knee-jerk attempting to disprove him.
Go about things however you like. I can't make anyone like anyone else, and I'm sure there's room to rebut what I've said, but I'm just suggesting that much of the tension you all feel towards him could be avoided by not outright dismissing his opinions, no matter how tactless they at first appear.