Warsaint777
Smash Lord
Man I need to get a damn wii for PM, ugh. The issues for me are that and having to upgrade my internet to what'll prob cost me like 70 doll hairs a month. I can't be doin that with what i make right meow.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
lmao omg mw ure such a dikThen STFU, you think we wanna hear this? lol
Interesting. What exactly did they say?
More here: Iwata: Wii U/3DS will cater to core gamers first, mass market secondSpeaking in an investor Q&A following its financial report last week, Iwata explained that the platform holder has learned from mistakes made with the Wii.
While that console succeeded in attracting new customers with more casual titles such as Wii Sports, he admitted Nintendo had then struggled to convince core gamers to take the platform seriously, which negatively impacted the system's long term success.
"The Wii was able to reach a large number of new consumers who had never played games before by bringing hands-on experiences with its Wii Sports and Wii Fit," he explained.
"However, we could not adequately create the situation that such new consumers played games frequently or for long, consistent periods. As a result, we could not sustain a good level of profit.
"Moreover, regrettably, what we prioritised in order to reach out to the new audience was a bit too far from what we prioritised for those who play games as their hobby. Consequently, we presume some people felt that the Wii was not a game system for them or they were not willing to play with the Wii even though some compelling games had been released."
Let me try my best Mechwarrior impression to answer that question.Does Mechwarrior really have to post images with nearly every post?
Formatting via bold, underlines, and italics along with proper usage of quotation marks can express your satisfaction, or dissatisfaction with posts quite effectively.Maybe I will just start responding to this thread with vocaroo's so you can truly understand the tone of my posts.
... Seriously? I think people in here are taking bigger issue with your overtly pessimistic and down-trodden attitude rather than your game of choice. And hung as a traitor? You're talking to a demographic that's been insulted for playing a mod and despised by some for allegedly causing the death of Brawl (PM's only a catalyst, the BBR/community did far more harm to that game). I don't think anyone in here has had an issue with you playing Sm4sh. At the most, a good chunk of us are critical of it, but still feel it'll do fine in the long run. But hostile this is not, you're reaching for an already perceived conclusion. Relax, stop letting people's opinions influence you so much, and play the game you want.I came into this thread knowing it would be hostile. I certainly feel like I've been hung as a traitor and not a true fan. But what do I do? Go back to a game where I can't actually play against anyone else? I mean, I'm capable of it and I can hold my own when I DO play, but I almost never have the opportunity due to them being local-only.
ya. and the boilers broke at my house. really fun.I hate the cold
noTake a wider-view than just how many copies of the game are sold.
maybe the Wii sold so well 'cause it had a lot of good gamesThe main reason brawl sold more than melee is because the Wii was so much more successful than the gamecube being one of the best selling consoles ever.
no what I'm saying is that the large majority of people who bought Brawl aren't the type of people who ever think using the word "casual" to describe video gamesI also hope you aren't implying that Brawl being more casual (disregarding the meaning of saying this) is what made it sold more.
Mechwarrior is a legend over here. When we lost our original Liker/image poster 9kplus1, Mech stepped up and took over. Gotta respect the man.Does Mechwarrior really have to post images with nearly every post?
That qualifies for legend status now-a-days..?Mechwarrior is a legend over here. When we lost our original Liker/image poster 9kplus1, Mech stepped up and took over. Gotta respect the man.
I cant wait until we see the rest, this was too good.
You're right... That's exactly the problem. Sorry. I just always feel like everyone has their sights aimed at me and I strike preemptively. I've gotta stop doing that. It's also the same thing that's cost me quite a few matches...... Seriously? I think people in here are taking bigger issue with your overtly pessimistic and down-trodden attitude rather than your game of choice. And hung as a traitor? You're talking to a demographic that's been insulted for playing a mod and despised by some for allegedly causing the death of Brawl (PM's only a catalyst, the BBR/community did far more harm to that game). I don't think anyone in here has had an issue with you playing Sm4sh. At the most, a good chunk of us are critical of it, but still feel it'll do fine in the long run. But hostile this is not, you're reaching for an already perceived conclusion. Relax, stop letting people's opinions influence you so much, and play the game you want.
But beyond this though, PM can be played online in two different fashions: private wifi on console or netplay through emulation. The latter is especially good if you have the computer for it.
Uh no, there's a lot more to it. Might have to do with some sort of control thing, idunno maybe the Wiimote being an enormous pull for the system or something. There's a reason why the user base that appeared for the Wii all but disappeared for the Wii U (actually a lot of reasons but regardless).maybe the Wii sold so well 'cause it had a lot of good games
you know
like Brawl
Again no, Melee was widely successful on both fronts. The game did amazingly well overall and now it was going to get exposed to an even bigger audience through Brawl. The success of Brawl comes from having a much larger install base to play the game on (I think you are hugely underselling this, especially seeing as how Brawl is only 9th in top sales on the console as it is) and that it was following Melee, a game that was highly praised and enjoyed by many for years; its sales should be of no surprise. The 3DS has a similarly strong player base and I expect it to reach or surpass Melee's lifetime sales eventually. I'm curious about the Wii U release though because that would solidify the point here. Popularity could help it outsell Melee, but the Wii U has a pretty abysmal user base. It's certainly not going to reach Brawl sales; Smash and Mario Kart do a lot for a system but you're not going to reach Wii sales. That's all there is to it. I just really hope you're not implying sales = better without taking any of the context around it in like you have been doing.no what I'm saying is that the large majority of people who bought Brawl aren't the type of people who ever think using the word "casual" to describe video games
like a lot of you guys seem to be implying that Brawl only succeeded 'cause hopeful Melee-fans bought it - and yet, despite the consistent naysaying of the Melee fanbase, Smash 4 has already sold half as well as Melee has in its entire lifetime in little over a month (over twice as well as Melee did in the same span of time)
No one said that or even reasonably thinks that, not in this thread at least.again, I'm sure you'd all like to believe that the competitive Smash community is this millions strong group of people that's been purposefully ignored and it's a really big deal, but... it's not
The point being made is that Melee did perfectly fine the way it was without going out of its way to cater to casuals. Melee ending up as the most popular and successful competitive Smash has zero bearing on its success as a game in general.Nintendo looks and sees this group of maybe a thousand or two people saying Brawl wasn't fun and that Smash 4 isn't fun and then sees millions of other people saying they love it and like honestly how are you people even surprised that they cater to the group that not only pays the bills but also doesn't make it their business to be unreasonable
I never thought about the install base before. I completely forgot that the GameCube was a relative commercial failure.Uh no, there's a lot more to it. Might have to do with some sort of control thing, idunno maybe the Wiimote being an enormous pull for the system or something. There's a reason why the user base that appeared for the Wii all but disappeared for the Wii U (actually a lot of reasons but regardless).
And I'd argue that the Wii had a pretty terrible library overall. A couple of great gems here and there, but that's about it.
Again no, Melee was widely successful on both fronts. The game did amazingly well overall and now it was going to get exposed to an even bigger audience through Brawl. The success of Brawl comes from having a much larger install base to play the game on (I think you are hugely underselling this, especially seeing as how Brawl is only 9th in top sales on the console as it is) and that it was following Melee, a game that was highly praised and enjoyed by many for years; its sales should be of no surprise. The 3DS has a similarly strong player base and I expect it to reach or surpass Melee's lifetime sales eventually. I'm curious about the Wii U release though because that would solidify the point here. Popularity could help it outsell Melee, but the Wii U has a pretty abysmal user base. It's certainly not going to reach Brawl sales; Smash and Mario Kart do a lot for a system but you're not going to reach Wii sales. That's all there is to it. I just really hope you're not implying sales = better without taking any of the context around it in like you have been doing.
No one said that or even reasonably thinks that, not in this thread at least.
The point being made is that Melee did perfectly fine the way it was without going out of its way to cater to casuals. Melee ending up as the most popular and successful competitive Smash has zero bearing on its success as a game in general.
whatever you say bubAnd I'd argue that the Wii had a pretty terrible library overall. A couple of great gems here and there, but that's about it.
'cause it doesn't matterI think you are hugely underselling this
it's not that I think Brawl was better 'cause it sold more, it's that Brawl sold more because it was betterI just really hope you're not implying sales = better without taking any of the context around it in like you have been doing.
no man the point is that anyone who uses the word "casual" like you're doing right now doesn't matterThe point being made is that Melee did perfectly fine the way it was without going out of its way to cater to casuals.
That means literally the same thing; why would you even waste your time typing that.it's not that I think Brawl was better 'cause it sold more, it's that Brawl sold more because it was better
yeah whatever answer the questionBeing willfully ignora
no it doesn'tThat means literally the same thing
Regardless of the order, you are correlating sales with quality. Changing where you put your claim in the statement makes little difference.no it doesn't
not that i agree with bleckRegardless of the order, you are correlating sales with quality. Changing where you put your claim in the statement makes little difference.
Bleck's right in this case though.Regardless of the order, you are correlating sales with quality. Changing where you put your claim in the statement makes little difference.
correlating, yes - but saying that Brawl sold better because it was better doesn't necessarily imply causation, whereas saying that Brawl was better because it sold better doesRegardless of the order, you are correlating sales with quality. Changing where you put your claim in the statement makes little difference.