- Joined
- Apr 7, 2008
- Messages
- 7,681
- NNID
- OctagonalWalnut
- 3DS FC
- 0619-4291-4974
I just assumed the sets included more Pokémon since the overall number is larger now. My mistake.But you can only use from the same number of sets you could when playing when Wizard was in charge. The number of pokemon is an aesthetic again, because it doesn't even change the number of viable cards.
Probably because they aren't broken or too good.So if these cards are so broken or too good, then why aren't they being listed in the top decks?
As I stated, I just think the concept is stupid. A few of them seem broken, and I don't think that a broken card would be made balanced just by giving the opponent two prizes when they beat them, but I don't think the entire concept is broken.I'm not saying the EX cards are broken
Not that it affects me anyways, considering I won't care for the new TCG no matter what.