D
Deleted member
Guest
I want this.![]()
WAAAAAA-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I want this.![]()
WAAAAAA-
Miis aren't vastly unpopular. If they were vastly unpopular they would've been dropped by Nintendo a long time ago. If they were vastly unpopular they wouldn't have been included on both the 3DS and the Wii U. If they were vastly unpopular Nintendo wouldn't still have high-profile, highly-marketed and publicized games starring the Miis. Nintendo puts them in games because they sell. Third parties pay to use them in their games because they sell.Mo, Mii is not.
. Unfortunately, Miis are vastly unpopular, and nintendo is trying to get them in as many games as possible.
This is so contradictory it's incredible. If they made the game less popular (which they wouldn't - the casual market is huge), why would they frequent the online? If they weren't a popular choice or popular character, they would be used less online. Them showing up in abundance online would only prove their popularity.Miis in smash will no doubt make it a little bit less popular, for the online modes you will just always have miis and it will get incredibly frustrating.
Mii, in it's simplest form, is Nintendo's attempt at copying Microsoft's idea for an avatar.
Hah, you got me there. What I meant was a Nintendo character from an actual game, not a Nintendo avatar. Also, I wouldn't consider my Mii (Ove) being a Nintendo character, would you?Hang on a second, Mii is no longer a Nintendo character?
Actually, for the most part I am a casual gamer, being 'hardcore' (how I hate that word) in Pokemon and smash only.Miis aren't vastly unpopular. If they were vastly unpopular they would've been dropped by Nintendo a long time ago. If they were vastly unpopular they wouldn't have been included on both the 3DS and the Wii U. If they were vastly unpopular Nintendo wouldn't still have high-profile, highly-marketed and publicized games starring the Miis. Nintendo puts them in games because they sell. Third parties pay to use them in their games because they sell.
Sure, the "hardcore" isn't that fond of them, but it's quite obvious Sakurai doesn't gear Smash games solely towards the hardcore. They have popularity with the casual, and they are important to Nintendo. They are at least in the top 7 most deserving characters. It just comes down to Sakurai's opinion of their fighting potential.
This is so contradictory it's incredible. If they made the game less popular (which they wouldn't - the casual market is huge), why would they frequent the online? If they weren't a popular choice or popular character, they would be used less online. Them showing up in abundance online would only prove their popularity.
Plus sure some people might want to sure play as themselves and some will choose to main the Mii for whatever reason, but eventually most will probably shift to characters they play best as or enjoy the most, which would probably cause the Mii to on average be played no more than other characters.
As opinionated as you and your friends might be, that isn't a large enough sample size to negate the fact that Mii-oriented games sell very well and keep showing up, indicating large popularity with the Wii's main demographic (the ultra casual gamer).Actually, for the most part I am a casual gamer, being 'hardcore' (how I hate that word) in Pokemon and smash only.
This applies to all of my friends.
All of my friends, including me, hate Miis drastically, as do most of my friend's friends. If you ask me, Miis are actually more popular among the 'hardcore' (how I hate that word) gamers than the casual ones. By always being on the internet, I meant as a troll character. Also, there will be the inevitable people who make a mii with a **** on his face and look like an arse. That is what I meant.
Your post totally convinced me that Krystal has no shot in Smash 4 anymore.At decent shot of being ridiculed by the general public for being a very stupid and pointless character?
Except the weapon of choice does not determine how they'll use it.Makes no sense to include 2 staff wielding/magic using females.
Pretty much this.At decent shot of being ridiculed by the general public for being a very stupid and pointless character?
I don't think wanting a character partially because they're female is too crazy of a reason. Females can offer a different style of fighting so females could be added to have more of a diversity in fighting styles.People want Krystal because of that staff she hardly uses to begin with.
Also because being a female means something apparently.
Because females have a different body structure than men and as such, have to used different methods of fighting.Females offer a different style of fighting? That doesn't really make any form of sense. How does having a vagina automatically make a unique style of fighting?
Well if we get only three characters, they'll keep the ones we have since they already outclass Krystal in popularity. The only way Krystal gets in is if Star Fox gets a fourth spot.I don't know if StarFox should get 4 characters. I feel if she does get in, it could be risky for Falco or Wolf (in my opinion Falco). However, Falco has the best moveset and handling out of the 3 for me plus him being in since Melee, so there's a decent chance he'll be fine
This logic is has to be the biggest piece of bull**** I've ever heard. So what do you have to say about ice climbers?Because females have a different body structure than men and as such, have to used different methods of fighting.
The reason why females are of a relatively high proportion in fighting games (Smash Bros. being the exception) is because they can introduce different fighting styles to the game. Again, I am not saying being female automatically makes you a better choice or have a better shot at Smash Bros. since Smash plays by different rules, but it does allow for a different style of play.
Could you honestly see Zero Suit Samus playing the same if ZSS was male? I sure can't.
Well if we look at this:This logic is has to be the biggest piece of bull**** I've ever heard. So what do you have to say about ice climbers?
Also people misinterpret Krystal's importance WAY too much.
![]()
Chances are good that Ice Climbers uniqueness contributed to their inclusion. The reason why Ice Climbers are a very popular character in Smash is mainly because of their unique mechanics.Melee
One of the plans for Melee was to use a character who would represent NES games in general. Sakurai revealed a list of characters who had been considered (we don’t really know if it was all of them or not, though) along with reasons they had been dumped (some of the reasons were joking, some really weren’t). The rejected choices were:
-Balloon Fighter (“if his balloons were popped, he couldn’t do anything”)
-Urban Champion (“there’s not much you could do with him”)
-Bubbles (from Clu Clu Land) (“she (?) doesn’t really know how to fight”)
-Excitebike (“you’d have to install ramps on all the levels for him to be playable”)
The character that was actually chosen for this position was, of course, the Ice Climbers. Interesting that Pit apparently wasn’t in that list.
Different genders doesn't mean they can't fight the same. After all, Eddy and Christie fight exactly the same (I don't know why it's still like this though). It's just that the different body structures allow different strengths. Girls have proportionally longer, stronger, and more flexable legs than the guys who have larger upper bodys and less flexibility, proportionally speaking. Of course, despite this, you may have characters that go against gender conventions. Like, you have Fox who uses almost entirely kicks then you have the Vanessa from KOF who is a boxer.This logic is has to be the biggest piece of bull**** I've ever heard. So what do you have to say about ice climbers?
Wait, are you arguing against my last post or helping it? I ask because your first sentence is the reason why I brought up Ice Climbers before. They are both different genders that fight exactly the same. By SMBF's logic Nana wouldn't fight like Popo because she's a girl and would fight differently if she were a male. And what you said about male and female's thinking differently will determine how they fight, I can agree to a certain extent but it pretty much helps what SMBF said about Samus couldn't fight the same if she were a man, which I disagree because we have normal Samus that has a masculine like move set that doesn't portray gender whatsoever, and Sheik (Yes Sheik is a woman, but it's Zelda's disguise to make you think she's a man, and her body language shows it).Different genders doesn't mean they can't fight the same. After all, Eddy and Christie fight exactly the same (I don't know why it's still like this though). It's just that the different body structures allow different strengths. Girls have proportionally longer, stronger, and more flexable legs than the guys who have larger upper bodys and less flexibility, proportionally speaking. Of course, despite this, you may have characters that go against gender conventions. Like, you have Fox who uses almost entirely kicks then you have the Vanessa from KOF who is a boxer.
Also, when taking in character into account, the personality of the character will play a role in how they fight, just like Ryu and Ken. With girls and guys thinking differently, that's another factor that comes into play that will differentiate how they fight.
And yes, this applies to real life as well.
People want Krystal in the game because she is one the more interesting and unique characters out of Star Fox. She is capable of magic and telepathic powers. Yes, we barely saw her fight with her staff, but it still belongs to her. It’s safe to assume that she is equally skilled with it, if not better with it than Fox is. It doesn’t matter if we hardly see her use it. I mean, the F-Zero games mention that Captain Falcon is a bounty hunter, and yet we still didn’t see him fight or apprehend criminals in those games. Characters like these can still fight as long as it’s mentioned that they have the capability. Krystal is still a better choice than most of the other Star Fox characters imo.To stay on track with Krystal. She and Palutena don't even compare to each other. Krystal has no importance to the star fox storyline nor has contributed to the franchise at all except being the biggest fur bait character ever, plus people wanting her for shallow reasons like having a vagina and her staff that she hardly used in SF Adventures.
Slippy is already a bad idea for Smash Bros. He has pretty much been established as one of the most hated Nintendo characters. It’s ironic that he builds the technology for the Star Fox team… and yet he sucks at the Arwing.Apparently she's a better choice then Slippy. The guy that build's ALL the tech Fox and co. use and brings up the enemy's health.
The reason Nana and Popo fight the same is because they're a team. It would make sense for there to be some syncing between the two to fight effectively together.Wait, are you arguing against my last post or helping it? I ask because your first sentence is the reason why I brought up Ice Climbers before. They are both different genders that fight exactly the same. By SMBF's logic Nana wouldn't fight like Popo because she's a girl and would fight differently if she were a male. And what you said about male and female's thinking differently will determine how they fight, I can agree to a certain extent but it pretty much helps what SMBF said about Samus couldn't fight the same if she were a man, which I disagree because we have normal Samus that has a masculine like move set that doesn't portray gender whatsoever, and Sheik (Yes Sheik is a woman, but it's Zelda's disguise to make you think she's a man, and her body language shows it).
Could you make characters fight like them? Yes, but they would not be considered attractive unless girl Blanka went for an Amazon thing. And while videogames are not real life, you can't just toss out the suspension of disbelief entirely.The thing is, gender shouldn't even play a part on how a character plays in a fighting game or any game for that matter. Sakurai could, or anyone make up a female character that plays like Bo Rai Cho from Mortal Kombat (fart moves and all) or Blanka from Street Fighter with opposite physical proportions of those two characters, and it'll work. You know why? It's not real life.
As if importance in the series matters. The only reason people place more importance on Falco over Krystal is because he was around longer. Ultimately, it's about what she can bring to the table in regards to new playstyles, not importance. Never, has Sakurai said that importance in the series was a requirement.To stay on track with Krystal. She and Palutena don't even compare to each other. Krystal has no importance to the star fox storyline nor has contributed to the franchise at all except being the biggest fur bait character ever, plus people wanting her for shallow reasons like having a vagina and her staff that she hardly used in SF Adventures. Apparently she's a better choice then Slippy. The guy that build's ALL the tech Fox and co. use and brings up the enemy's health.
Krystal has already established a huge fanbase after being a main character in the latest 3 StarFox games (not including the 64 remake for obvious reasons). If more games were to be made she would undoubtedly be included... She's very important to the series now whether you want to admit it or not. All it takes is an announcement that a new StarFox game is in development and Krystal's chances for Smash 4 will skyrocket.Importance is a requirement whether you like it or not, and it shows.
Absolutely not.Would you consider Geno important?
The only importance Peach has in the Mario series is getting captured by Bowser... your point?Krystal isn't even that important at all. The only importance she ever had in the entire series was being Fox's shallow lover, which is hardly bragging rights. This is especially notable since it's hinted that Krystal is not loyal to Star Fox at all and is only in the team to be close to Fox, which is kinda shallow.
Super Mario Bros. 2Has Peach ever fought alongside Mario?