Ridley FTB!!!
Smash Lord
since i dont want anything to do with megaman i dont know how he is deconfimred.
can someone tell me plz?
can someone tell me plz?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Theres a lot of things I dont like, no offense:
Bowser Jr: I say hes gotta have the shadow mario transformation, seeing how sheik may not come back, hed be the only one with a transformation (not counting zamus seeing how "under certain conditions" she'll transform)
Twili midna: Seriously all of us who played TP are used to see midna in her imp form, why should she have a form weve only seen for about 5 minutes (at the end of the game)? I say Imp form or no deal
Also Zant is another good choice for a zelda character...
Mewtwo: how can u not have mewtwo on the list, yet jiggly is rite there, I say jiggly, not being as popular as she once was, should leave, and give mewtwo (that to this day is still considered the strongest pkmn [at least i think XD]) the boot? yet good job addin deoxys and lucario...
Metroid series: I have nothing against ur roster in the metroid part, yet sakurai stated he wanted to better represent the series, I just can c 3 characters (not counting zamus since u will [probably] not be able to select her rite from the selection screen)representing well the series, I say we gotta add a hunter in there: sylux weavel rundus seems like great choices, but only one can make it in
SF series: Wheres wolf??
FE: I think we can use more characters, maybe the goddes of dawn girl (forgot the name)?
yoshi series: I wanna c kamek in there
wario series: 9-volt and mona should be in, wario ware series is just that awesome
Kid icarus series: theres only a handful of retro series that can have mroe than 2 characters, kid icarus being one of them, I say they should add pelutena, that would bring some pwnage to the game, more retros the better!
Mii: 100% AAGREEE!! MII FTW!!!
too many 3rd parties, and with only 3 having the spot, I say: snake, sonic and megaman
I wouldnt say good bye to the ICs just yet, also geno shouldnt be counted as 3rd (ill explain l8r) and some characters like mach rider would bring pwnage even more to the list
overall 8/10
Seems pretty much perfect to me. The only problem I see is that it is somewhat lacking in the crazy surprises department. (Although Geno would come as a surprise to anyone outside of Smashboards).Great Thread!
Here are my predictions:
*Mario.
*Luigi.
*Peach.
*Bowser.
*Geno.
*Link.
*Zelda/Sheik.
*Ganondorf.
*Link WW
*Kirby.
*Metaknight.
*King DDD.
*DK.
*Diddy.
*Samus/Zamus.
*Ridley
*Fox
*Falco
*Kristal
*C.Falcon.
*Lucas.
*Pikachu.
*Jigglypuff.
*Red.
*Mewtwo.
*Yoshi.
*Wario.
*Ike.
*Marth.
*Pit
*Ice Climbers
*G&W
*C.Olimar
*Snake
*Sonic
*Megaman
40 characters(counting transformations).
Does anyone actually like the Rayman character? He seems pretty cookie cutter to me. But if I thought thare was a decent chamce of a Rabbid making the cut - you can bet I'd include him in a heart beat.OK, 8 3rd parties, and none of them are Rayman? Really wiseguy. Really.
Here ya go: http://www.nintendowiifanboy.com/2007/12/22/no-mega-man-in-brawl-it-seems/since i dont want anything to do with megaman i dont know how he is deconfimred.
can someone tell me plz?
I would say there is a strong chance of he being a mewtwo replacement, but the last time I predicted that Poke-fans burnt effigies of me in the streets...I agree. but your missing lucario who is very, very likley
Identical? Not exactly. You see, the animations are different. This is odd, considering that most characters retain their old animations from Melee. One or two redone moves moves would be expected, but all of them? If Lucas was a Ness clone (which he isn't, by the way) he'd be the first clone in Smash history to have new animations for all of his specials.Those moves aren't just similar dude, they are indentical (save for his movements, I suppose). Either Ness and Lucas are clones or Sakurai ran out of ideas. (Or Ness is dead.)
Well, first of all, Lucas does have a unique moveset. Just look at his standard moves.Not to be rude, but there s a pretty logical explanation for why Ness's Melee moveset was completely remade: it kinda sucked. Seriously, why not just remake the moveset to fit the new Mother rep - only not useless. He he were going to make two unique movesets for the two characters, why not make them... unique?
Yes, but aside from the movement animations those three attacks (up-b, over-b, down-b) they seem to behave COMPLETELY identically. A very weird choice if both characters were designed with unique movesets - as even Luigi's attacks behave differently. It just doesn't make sense to me unless Ness is a clone or removed.Identical? Not exactly. You see, the animations are different. This is odd, considering that most characters retain their old animations from Melee. One or two redone moves moves would be expected, but all of them? If Lucas was a Ness clone (which he isn't, by the way) he'd be the first clone in Smash history to have new animations for all of his specials.
Personaly, I think Sakurai is going for a Mario/Luigi dynamic with Lucas and Ness.
Well, first of all, Lucas does have a unique moveset. Just look at his standard moves.
Second of all, I'd like you to remember the clones from Melee. I'm sure you'll recall that the clones, who's entire creation revolved around the idea of saving time, had new models, selection screen portraits, break the target levels, trophies, sound effects, and completely rebalanced movesets. But their animations remained the same, were practically the only thing to remain the same. What does this tell us? It tells us that the most time-consuming part of creating a moveset is the animations, and that it's easier (or at least quicker) to completely rebalance any given moveset than to re-animate it.
Did Ness's moveset suck? Well, re-balancing it is as easy as changing a few variables in the game's code; re-animating it would require the combined efforts of several people to get the motion and hit boxes in order.
Whether or not you believe Lucas will replace Ness, there are two undeniable points to consider:
1)Lucas is not a Ness clone, as proven by their differing animations.
2)It would have been far, far easier to give Lucas Ness's moveset AND re-balance it than to give Lucas his own moveset. But Lucas undeniably has his own unique (albeit superficially similar) moveset.
Identical? Not exactly. You see, the animations are different. This is odd, considering that most characters retain their old animations from Melee. One or two redone moves moves would be expected, but all of them? If Lucas was a Ness clone (which he isn't, by the way) he'd be the first clone in Smash history to have new animations for all of his specials.
Personaly, I think Sakurai is going for a Mario/Luigi dynamic with Lucas and Ness.
Well, first of all, Lucas does have a unique moveset. Just look at his standard moves.
Second of all, I'd like you to remember the clones from Melee. I'm sure you'll recall that the clones, who's entire creation revolved around the idea of saving time, had new models, selection screen portraits, break the target levels, trophies, sound effects, and completely rebalanced movesets. But their animations remained the same, were practically the only thing to remain the same. What does this tell us? It tells us that the most time-consuming part of creating a moveset is the animations, and that it's easier (or at least quicker) to completely rebalance any given moveset than to re-animate it.
Did Ness's moveset suck? Well, re-balancing it is as easy as changing a few variables in the game's code; re-animating it would require the combined efforts of several people to get the motion and hit boxes in order.
Whether or not you believe Lucas will replace Ness, there are two undeniable points to consider:
1)Lucas is not a Ness clone, as proven by their differing animations.
2)It would have been far, far easier to give Lucas Ness's moveset AND re-balance it than to give Lucas his own moveset. But Lucas undeniably has his own unique (albeit superficially similar) moveset.
Well, the reason I went with "Wiseguy's Brawl Predictions" is because I'm Wiseguy, and these and my "predictions" about Smash Bros Brawl.Why are you calling this 'wise guys brawl predictions'?!?!? all u did was pick all the most cliche characters everyone has thought up so far and put it out there in an obnoxiously long list. you might as well have labeled this sakurais poll
I think you should check those moves again. You'll find that Lucas's moves are full of differences from Ness's in the Mario/Luigi style.Yes, but aside from the movement animations those three attacks (up-b, over-b, down-b) they seem to behave COMPLETELY identically. A very weird choice if both characters were designed with unique movesets - as even Luigi's attacks behave differently. It just doesn't make sense to me unless Ness is a clone or removed.
I see what you mean, but I still like my theory better. I think that Lucas and Ness are going to have the same kind of dynamic that Mario and Luigi had in Melee.After thinking about it though, I think you are right that they being clones would be pretty much impossible. But while rebalancing Ness might be less time consuming than making Lucas from scratch, making Lucas from scratch AND rebalancing Ness would take more time than just remaking Lucas sans Ness (while at the same time allowing Lucas to inherient some of Ness' moveset). That's my theory, anyway.
Evidence against Geno? Even more? What is it, I didn't find it on the Geno thread.well recent news may prove otherwise, checkout the geno thread.
edit: nvm the news was fake
some guy had a blog saying that he contacted s-e about geno in brawl, and says they responded to him saying that they have not been contacted by nintendo yet. But the same day the post was removed so it was most likely a fake.Evidence against Geno? Even more? What is it, I didn't find it on the Geno thread.
As for the fate of Ness, I think that Oyster Meister has a point, but I can't really pick out what could happen next. I personally don't want to see The Twelve ripped apart, but apparently Sakurai is MOTHER 3 obsessed.
...13) Rick or another Kirby character
Yeah, as much as I love Rick, Kirby does not need anymore playable characters....
No.
There will only be 3 Kirby characters.
not that i have anything against marth but i dont think that sakuri cares about or even knows about tiers. I think he'll keep marth in there only if he or the fans like him enough.I like Wiseguys predicctions....The only problem in it starts with M and ends with arth.
I think Marth chances are very high because remake,high tier,etc.
I agree, but I have a huge feeling that nothing's going to change.Well folks, it's another year, the year we get Brawl. Unfortunately all we have to do is sit around and cool our heels until tthe seventh, and I sincerely hope that we get something big, and I mean BIG from Sakurai. You owe us for putting us through such mundanity as "Widescreen Settings" and "Options". He'd better give us something HUGE like Ridley, Olimar, something desired for a long time. Not music. Not funtions or how to plays. We. Need. Characters.
'Nuff said.
Well, it is pretty ****ing obvious that doing one thing would take less time than doing two things. Then again, with different people or different teams working on individual characters, ya never know.After thinking about it though, I think you are right that they being clones would be pretty much impossible. But while rebalancing Ness might be less time consuming than making Lucas from scratch, making Lucas from scratch AND rebalancing Ness would take more time than just remaking Lucas sans Ness (while at the same time allowing Lucas to inherient some of Ness' moveset). That's my theory, anyway.
WTF are you even talking about? You could always try thinking if you don't understand something.How are you and Devastlian still talking about this?
Mario has a new animation for his Fsmash, Bair, Dair is different, new down Special...OMG MARIO IS A CLONE OF MARIO!!!!
Mario and Mario will be in Brawl
This cracks me up!
Well...As for the fate of Ness, I think that Oyster Meister has a point, but I can't really pick out what could happen next. I personally don't want to see The Twelve ripped apart, but apparently Sakurai is MOTHER 3 obsessed.
I believe we're due for a Mario song, Zelda and Snake's Final Smash, a few of the veterans' special moves, a few items and assist trophies from the demos, crawling...Those could easily fill up the thirteen updates before the release. Roffle roffle roffle. Then again, they could always just do triple updates from here on out.Well folks, it's another year, the year we get Brawl. Unfortunately all we have to do is sit around and cool our heels until tthe seventh, and I sincerely hope that we get something big, and I mean BIG from Sakurai. You owe us for putting us through such mundanity as "Widescreen Settings" and "Options". He'd better give us something HUGE like Ridley, Olimar, something desired for a long time. Not music. Not funtions or how to plays. We. Need. Characters.
'Nuff said.
Sakurai is making the game....
No.
There will only be 3 Kirby characters.
We have the three characters we need. Well, Sakurai can put more, if he want to.Yeah, as much as I love Rick, Kirby does not need anymore playable characters.
Actually, I think that that is one of the things Sakurai won't do, specifically because he made the Kirby series. I'm sure that one of the things he set out to do when making Brawl was to give a little love to the Kirby series, but he certainly doesn't want to blare out on his own horn so that it deafens all others. PAting yourself on the back for a job well done is one thing, but three characters in one sitting? Even the Mario franchise didn't get 3 (excluding Luigi, who was in SSB64) new characters for Melee and they definitely have earns most cudos from the big N. Listen, Sakurai probably doesn't want to look cocky or ego filled. He's given Kirby a well deserved dose of reps, but slapping on so many characters for a franchise you made? It's overkill. Maybe we'll see Rick or others in SSB4, but for now, lets not go oveerboard on the Kirby characters.Sakurai is making the game.
And I don't think that Sakurai would put the Kirby series at the same level with represantations than Fire Emblem, StarFox or the DK series. I think he want to put the Kirby series at the same level like the Mario series, Zelda series and Pokémon.
The Kirby series get lot of representation. We have three characters. It's the highest number of characters confirmed on the Dojo (with the Mario series).
And it's the last chance to give the Kirby series the high number of characters. It's his last game.
=> That's the reason I think, we get another Kirby related character.
We have the three characters we need. Well, Sakurai can put more, if he want to.
Maggirus
Master Chief still belongs to Microsoft. Only Bungie doesn't belong 100% to Microsoft anymore.On another note, am I the only one that thinks that SSBB has covered all of the bases as far as reps go? I mean, what oter big franchise is there that isn't in Brawl? I've already thrown out my two cents that now that Bungie's 2nd party the Cheif has a chance for the next one, but who else is there that big enough to get in? Nintendo's got every popular franchise that they own covered, so I suppose that third party will become much more increased as time passes. Some of the top icons, Lara Croft, the sadly lost his glory Crash Bandicoot, The stealthy Sam Fisher. All possibilities for SSB4, but most likely, not now.
But both of those series got one new rep. (And you said Fire Emblem twice). We're lucky that Kirby got two new reps. Not even DK, who has been with Nintendo literally from the beginning has just now gotten Diddy and may or may not get K. Rool, and that would be lucky too.But I don't think Sakurai will rep the Kirby series same like Fire Emblem series, DK series or Fire Emblem series. (Wiseguy solve this problem in a good way)
Yeah, but you have to factor in the other rep spots that have been neglected. F-Zero, Earthbound, Yoshi, they all have only one rep, and if Kirby can get three more then surely it wouldn't be out of the qestion to give them some too? Listen, Sakurai won't do that because he'll seem bias. "Oh yeah, Sakurai gives his own series four reps, but when it comes to the others he's got cold feet. What a jerk." Does Sakurai want something like that blemishing his resume? I doubt it.That's a little bit bad to say, but I try it:
For SSB Kirby and King Dedede were planned (15 characters were originally planned)
For Melee Kirby, King Dedede and Meta Knight were planned (25 characters with an own moveset)
Having ~40 characters in Brawl, the Kirby series could get four reps.
Yeah, did F-Zero, Earthbound, DK, or Yoshi get newcomers? Listen, in a game like this you have a problem never encountered in a fighting game before (Besides Soulcalibur [slightly] and Marvel VS Capcom). They have to pay attention to the more popular before adding a handful to a rep, let alone three.BTW SSB -> SSBM
Mario series: Mario + Luigi (clone) [1 1/2]
-> Mario + Peach + Bowser + Luigi (semiclone) + Dr.Mario (clone) [4 1/4]
__
+ 3 3/4 characters
Zelda series: Link [1]
-> Link + Zelda + Shiek + Ganondorf (clone) + YLink (clone) [4]
__
+3 charactes
Pokémon: Pikachu + Jigglypuff [2]
-> Pikachu + Jigglypuff + Mewtwo + Pichu [4]
__
+2 charactes
Kirby got 0 newcomer.
Did you ever think that perhaps those characters are getting so much attention because they're compensating for only having three reps? Perhaps them having a big role in SE and four reps is pushinng it a bit far, don't you think?Don't forget that the Kirby series has a big role in Brawl. Meta's ship, the beggining and Sakurai shows the Kirby series as one of the four biggest Nintendo series.
...well
People will mind no matter how unique the character, it still will take up a space that people would rather have go to Olimar or Ridley.I think the fourth Kirby rep could be an unique character like Marx. So nobody would mind that Sakurai put three new Kirby characters in.
Bungie and bungie alone holds the rights to the future of the Halo series and all affiliated in it. Microsoft has none. Thus the 2nd Party title Bungie has now aquired.Master Chief still belongs to Microsoft. Only Bungie doesn't belong 100% to Microsoft anymore.
What are the Nintendo Wars?I think the biggest serie of Nintendo not represented in Brawl with a rep is Nintendo Wars.
Maggirus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_WarsWhat are the Nintendo Wars?
We're not lucky we get three Kirby reps, they were necessary. DK series is very important to Nintendo, they are underrated (I think because of the worse games in last time).But both of those series got one new rep. (And you said Fire Emblem twice). We're lucky that Kirby got two new reps. Not even DK, who has been with Nintendo literally from the beginning has just now gotten Diddy and may or may not get K. Rool, and that would be lucky too.
It's just one more character and even the Kirby series are a very important franchise for Nintendo, unlike the other three you mentioned. Well, is it that worse to have four Kirby characters?Yeah, but you have to factor in the other rep spots that have been neglected. F-Zero, Earthbound, Yoshi, they all have only one rep, and if Kirby can get three more then surely it wouldn't be out of the qestion to give them some too? Listen, Sakurai won't do that because he'll seem bias. "Oh yeah, Sakurai gives his own series four reps, but when it comes to the others he's got cold feet. What a jerk." Does Sakurai want something like that blemishing his resume? I doubt it.
So, only popular characters will be in? I doubt it.Yeah, did F-Zero, Earthbound, DK, or Yoshi get newcomers? Listen, in a game like this you have a problem never encountered in a fighting game before (Besides Soulcalibur [slightly] and Marvel VS Capcom). They have to pay attention to the more popular before adding a handful to a rep, let alone three.
It could be, but it could be also a sign that Sakurai is overrepresenting his Kirby serie.Did you ever think that perhaps those characters are getting so much attention because they're compensating for only having three reps? Perhaps them having a big role in SE and four reps is pushinng it a bit far, don't you think?
Like Mr. G&W and Ice Climber being in instead of Wario, Diddy and King Dedede in Melee?People will mind no matter how unique the character, it still will take up a space that people would rather have go to Olimar or Ridley.
Microsoft has the rights of Master Chief and Halo. Bungie is 2nd Party.Bungie and bungie alone holds the rights to the future of the Halo series and all affiliated in it. Microsoft has none. Thus the 2nd Party title Bungie has now aquired.
Kirby has gotten enough reps. They've gotten 2 new reps, which is more than any other franchise yet (count PT as one). That could also be the biggest increase seen in brawl. Look at it that way and Sakurai has already done something good for the Kirby Franchise.We're not lucky we get three Kirby reps, they were necessary. DK series is very important to Nintendo, they are underrated (I think because of the worse games in last time).
Like Mr. G&W and Ice Climber being in instead of Wario, Diddy and King Dedede in Melee?
They play the game and they see how awesome it is, like that what happend in Melee. And even, is one additional character really that worse? It sounds like a 4th Kirby character would take the space of 20 other more neccesary.
It's your opinion based. For Melee (25 character roster) three Kirby characters were planned, but because of lack of time they haven't be included.Kirby has gotten enough reps. They've gotten 2 new reps, which is more than any other franchise yet (count PT as one). That could also be the biggest increase seen in brawl. Look at it that way and Sakurai has already done something good for the Kirby Franchise.
Like in Melee? Clones, Mr. G&W and cloned Ganondorf in, instead of the wish characters like Diddy, Dedede or Wario. They play the game and after a short time, they're happy with this roster. Like in Melee. When the roster had been leaked, many people were angry about it. Now, nobody is complaining anymore.And yes, one character spot is a big deal. Just to touch a nerve, the thought of Ridley, Krystal, Issac, Olimar, Geno, or any other highly highly anticipated character losing out to some minor kirby character would put fans beyond irate. The different rosters on the boards are only separated by a few different spots and most don't have room for a fourth kirby rep, and people still complain that their character isn't represented.